Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All Might Be Better

December 17, 2010 -

Senator Al Franken (D-MN) does not like the new net neutrality proposal and has said publically that it could do "more harm than doing nothing at all." Franken says this for a number of reasons: it exempts wireless broadband from any nondiscrimination provisions, it gives a nod of approval to paid prioritization. In his view, the FCC would be better off waiting and doing net neutrality the right way.

Franken is not alone in his criticism; Republicans don't want any form of net neutrality, while Democrats -- including advocacy groups such as Free Press and the ECA - don't like it because it doesn't do enough.

"I am very worried that the draft Order does not do enough to preserve that openness," he wrote to FCC Chair Julius Genachowski. In fact, as presently written, it could do "more harm than doing nothing at all."

Franken goes on to say that, "absent significant changes to the draft Order as it has been described to me, adopting these rules as they are may actually send signals to industry endorsing any closing off of the Internet that is not specifically prohibited."

Source: Ars Technica


Comments

Re: Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All ...

It seems to me that the current version would actually do the opposite of what neutrality means to do. I escpecially don't like the section that encourages ISPs to charge by usage. That gives them the power to make cutting the cable more inconvenient. They don't want us to stop using their expensive legacy services, it's too profitable and competition is scarce. If I want to watch my favorite shows by way of the internet, I shouldn't be punished because it happens to be a large file. They don't cap our connections because the network is overwhelmed, they do it because that makes it harder to depend solely on the internet for communications and entertainment. They're like spoiled children, throwing a trantrum because they can't be allowed to abuse the rules to their benefit. So they lie, cheat, and steal to keep their superior position while the rest of the kids at the table are feeling mistreated.

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All ...

"They don't want us to stop using their expensive legacy services, it's too profitable and competition is scarce"

 

Free to air sattelite.  You may not get as many channel as you would via cable but you get enough that makes dumping pay tv worth it considering alot of cable content is already on the internet.

Competition isn't scarce.  Its just badly promoted.

Re: Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All ...

Why would I even bother? Why can't I centralize my phone, TV, and world wide web over one line? It's all anyone really needs today. All of the others are just attempts to milk the public for more money. Screw satellite and cable! I can get any and all shows/movies from the internet and I can watch it when I'm ready to watch it, as many times as I care to watch it.

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All ...

@

Just give it time.  Eventually some sort of regulation hidden under the disguise of a Law intended to do something else will cripple the internet.  It happened with terrestrial radio and its only a matter of time before it happens with the internet.

If your going to make light of free satelite then something is wrong with you sir.  : P

Re: Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All ...

"Bam, I got you, you're dead"

"Uh, but, i'm wearing armor that's invisible and makes me invincible, so I can'tr die"

"You can't do that"

"Nuh uh, I just did"

"No, I killed you, you can't do that"

*huffs* "I'm going home!!"

Re: Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All ...

And that is ultimately what big business wants. No law is better than corrupted one.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: Senator Franken and Net Neutrality: Nothing at All ...

He's probably right. The nerfed bill is worse than no law at all.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenIt's a pizza joint. It caters weddings? Really? I mean, that's cool. Really cool, even. But seriously?04/01/2015 - 6:02pm
Consterhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/01/indiana-pizza-gay-couples_n_6985208.html04/01/2015 - 5:57pm
Andrew EisenConster - Link?04/01/2015 - 5:55pm
Conster-annnd they are 'temporarily closed' after phone threats. Way to take the moral high ground against bigotry, people. -,-04/01/2015 - 5:51pm
ConsterThe first business to use SB101 to deny service to gay weddings has arisen - let's see if EZK's theory about the free market being sufficient to deal with them holds u-04/01/2015 - 5:50pm
MonteYa i remember when she first started her videos with the comment sections open. There was A LOT of vile harrassment to shift through to get to any REAL debate. Youtube is a TERRIBLE debate forum. Can't blame her for not wanting to deal with harrasment.04/01/2015 - 5:49pm
ConsterWho's this "Anitia Skeeter" person you speak of?04/01/2015 - 5:31pm
Matthew Wilsonfatal frame coming to the US04/01/2015 - 5:25pm
ZippyDSMleeIanC: Not really but if that keeps you warm at night then well...its not me dealing with all that hatred daily :P04/01/2015 - 4:57pm
ZippyDSMleehttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/03/it-felt-like-robbery-tomb-raider-and-the-fall-of-core-design/04/01/2015 - 4:55pm
james_fudgeIanC: or she doesn't like to be called every name in the book.04/01/2015 - 4:51pm
Matthew Wilson@IanC I may not like her work, but I recagnize that people were harassing her in the comets, so no I do not blame her for clossing them.04/01/2015 - 4:49pm
IanCAnitia Skeeter won't allow comments because she doesn't like debate.04/01/2015 - 4:46pm
Sora-ChanTestTube did a video on the Trans-Pascific Partnership https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W4Zc55pCtY04/01/2015 - 4:06pm
ZippyDSMleepicking up The Feminist Wire , Mary Sue and Feminist frequency , a shame FF had to close down comments, I tend to drop anyhting that dose not allow comments these days but as seeing how much spam and trolling they get I will it slide.04/01/2015 - 4:03pm
ZippyDSMleeOkay now that I can understand, I was focusing on total outcome not just reinforcement.So its about reinforcement of poor feelings/behavior than anything else..now I get it....uhg forest for the trees.....04/01/2015 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenBut again, to be clear, that does not mean consuming violent media will make you violent.04/01/2015 - 3:46pm
Andrew EisenZippy - Not totally sure what you're getting at but it's the same idea that when our fiction is full of stories where violence is the solution to everything, it helps reinforce the idea that violence is the answer in real life.04/01/2015 - 3:46pm
Andrew EisenAlso, just in case anyone wasn't clear on this, Sarkeesian's argument in her latest video is that we "need more women-centric stories of all kinds." That's it.04/01/2015 - 3:44pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen Okay so would that be like violence something that has a loose tie to the real world, or would that be an oversimplification?04/01/2015 - 3:43pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician