Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what kids watch

December 20, 2010 -

An editorial penned by California State Senator and anti-game crusader Leeland Yee says that parents should be able to control what kids watch, but how parents come to that conclusion is the probably a sticky subject for many of our readers.

In the editorial Yee says that California has "been hard at work trying to protect children from the harmful effects of excessively violent video games. In the Legislature, we have attempted to give greater authority to parents in determining which video games are appropriate for their children."

He is of course speaking of the law they passed five years ago that was ultimately struck down by the courts shortly thereafter:

"In 2005, I authored a law to prohibit the sale of extremely violent video games to minors. The video game industry immediately sued the state, preventing the law from being enforced. The law has since been litigated all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, with justices expected to make a ruling in the spring."

Yee goes on top talk about various studies "by the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Psychological Association" that conclude that "adolescents who play violent video games may become increasingly aggressive over time."

Naturally, Yee doesn't mention the data on the other end of the spectrum that comes to contrary conclusions about playing games and agressive behavior.

Finally after quoting SCTOUS justices that were supportive of California's position, Yee says that he is hopeful:

"I am hopeful that a majority of justices will agree that parents – not retailers or game makers – should determine which video games are appropriate for kids. A ruling in favor California’s law will not only ensure that parents make such decisions, but will help protect our children in the years to come."

You can read the entiure editorial here.

Commentary: Edirtotials may sway public opinion on a subject, but it is rare that they sway the courts. Besides, the piublic is much more concerned about staggering levels of unemployment and run-away spending in California, than it is about passing a law to do a job that is already being done by retailers and the ESRB ratings system.


Comments

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

You can't legislate parental control. There are pirated games, friend's houses, etc. Parents can mostly control what happens in their house, they can have discussions with their children which games they want them to play, which they don't, and why, but in the end there is only so much control you can exert over someone.

If I thought Yee was motivated by a genuine desire to empower parents then I wouldn't be so critical of his poorly concieved attempts to legislate these issues, but I think it is clear he wants to garner votes with parents who fear a new medium they didn't grow up with and don't understand and want to protect their children from, whether or not they are actually dangerous.

In the end I think our judicial system has done a good job of protecting 1st amendment rights here and like all other such attempts his is bound to fail. My challenge to these people is to introduce similar legislation aimed at violent movies and TV shows and music with violent lyrics. The principle is exactly the same. Of course people are familiar and comfortable with those mediums and would not support such legislation.

When the Supreme Court eventually rules in favor of the entertainment industry I hope that will put an end to such legislation attempts. The average age of gamers continues to rise, currently the children's market makes up only ~25% of the total market for videogames.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

Leland Yee continues to prove himself to be a blithering, redundant idiot who loses credibility every time he opens his mouth. Gee, kinda like the Metropolitian Moron of Miami.

Hard at work doing what, exactly, Mr. Yee? Wasting taxpayer money while California will go completely bankrupt next year according to financial analyst Meredith Whitney?

Parents already do control what their crotch-fruit watch, they don't need and never needed help from your worthless ass.

California will lose in the Supreme Court, no doubt about it. Deal with it, Mr. Yee, as it's become more and more pathetic that you whine and cry about the courts rejecting your precious piece of shit law like an overzealous Minnesota Vikings fan still whining and moaning about last season's NFC Championship Game.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

Speaking of that bitch Phyllis Schlafly, we need to control these so-called attempted laws. There are too way too many claims these days, and fear has allow them to have teeth. Even worse, each claim and victory is only encouraging these cockroach vermin to come of the woodwork and continue to take away OUR common sense and freedoms. Which is worse, a police state or nanny state? If we don't start protesting this, we'll get an answer to that scary question real quick, I promise you that.

-------

GamePolitics, it's time for a mobile version of the site, don't you think?

-------

"WARNING GUARANTEE: This post contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor suppress."

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

So he wants to outlaw violent games so parents can have control over content. 0_o No that doesn't sound like government censorship at all.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

I'd personally like to introduce Mr. Yee to this radically new technology called the V-Chip.

Since we're on the subject of new features, how about the fact that every single DVD Player has a parental code lockout, as does every single digital cable / satellite set-top-box, and video game console made in the past 5 years.

My sarcasm is complete.

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

WIN! Yee just got his proverbial ass handed to him on a silver platter

岩「if Phyllis Schlafly wants to undo Women's Rights, she should lead by example and get back in the kitchen」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

"In the Legislature, we have attempted to give greater authority to parents in determining which video games are appropriate for their children."

 

Parents already have the ultimate authority.  They're the parents.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

"I am hopeful that a majority of justices will agree that parents – not retailers or game makers – or the government - should determine which video games are appropriate for kids."

Fixed that for you.

 

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

Wel ya know far as I'm concerned the way to fix this has nothing to do with videogames and eveyrthing to do with money. Banks should make debit cards for minors that tell parents exactly what they spend their money on when they spent it and that would be that I guess.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

That might be a good idea, but what about cash withdrawals? If the minor takes out cash, there will naturally be no record of where it was spent. Disallowing cash withdrawals using such a card would be difficult; sure, you might be able to rule out ATMs, but what about cashback from retailers? A $60 cash withdrawal on the statement might raise the alarm with parents, I suppose it's better than nothing.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

Simple, disable the card's ability to work on an ATM.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

I covered ATMs. I don't know the specifics of how ATMs are programmed, it may or may not be a simple case of a boolean variable. However, point-of-sale cashback is another world entirely, the card would identify it as a regular transaction; ruling it out completely would be difficult, if possible at all.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

OK, I'm beginning to think that Yee might very well be a crazy person.

Parents, as it stands now, do not have a law stating that they control what their kids watch- exactly what will change should his legislation get passed?  Parents would have just as much control over their households afterward.

And exactly HOW are these media companies and retailers making the decisions on what kids watch?  Yee is making an extraordinary claim, and needs to demonstrate through what process these entities are bypassing parental authority and placing this media before kids.  Last time I checked, parents are not only the ones with control over what is coming into their homes, but they also have authority over their kids as well as the MONEY that is needed to buy this media.  

 

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

"I am hopeful that a majority of justices will agree that parents – not retailers or game makers – should determine which video games are appropriate for kids"

Sorry to inform you Lee, but it is current already the parents who determine. You aren't giving them help, but trying to pass a law that will be taking away their ability to choose what their child can have and replacing it with government regulation. The government tells what is appropriate or not, and that can change depending on the mood of the day...

I'm sorry but isn't all the data he is spewing about it causing aggression still up in the air and has been in dispute for a long time? I would like to see this proof of his, if it exists.

That...and I am starting to think he is stuck in a void where logic and common sense seem not to apply to normal events and ideas.

---------

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

trying to pass a law that will be taking away their ability to choose what their child can have

How?

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

Because the wording is so vague in the bill that it removes those games at the corporate level by causing companies to question whether or not they’ll be fined for releasing a game.  This will also cause investors to start backing out if it's ruled in CA’s favor.

My take on his law is that he thinks he’s enforces the parent’s ability to choose, by removing their ability to choose.  If taken to the extreme (which isn’t farfetched for a government) it’s very similar to how VIKI interpreted the 3 Laws of Robotics (i, Robot); to protect humanity she must save it from itself… by enslaving it though Martial Law.

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

How would vagueness affect whether or not a parent could decide which game to pick off the shelf for their children? Are you saying because there wouldn't be any games left to choose from?

Re: Leeland Yee: Parents should be able to control what ...

Because the vagueness in the proposed law says "violent," which puts it anywhere between Slaughterhouse and the old (B&W) Looney Toons.  It’s completely subjective, yet treated as objective by this government law.  And if the industry gets fined for every game on the shelf that is deemed “violent” by Yee’s standards, then no one will want to produce a game and investors will back out in fear of loss in their RoI.  Then companies will be forced to fold, move to another country or produce puzzle-like games.

It’s like this:  I tell you that you can choose to go to any place in the world.  I then go pass a law to remove places that you get to choose from because I think they’re too dangerous.  However, I then say that this law that I just passed is designed to give you more power in your choice.

So did I, in fact, give you more power by limiting your choice?  Or did I devalue your freedom of choice, your judgment and your ability to make a decision?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Goth_SkunkAs such, the first playthrough is always going to be the most evocative.01/30/2015 - 3:47pm
Goth_SkunkSo while branching storyline is hallmarked as a feature of the game, the storyline never stays branched for too long. There is a linear story that may branch at points, but each branch always comes right back to the main line further down the road.01/30/2015 - 3:46pm
Goth_SkunkMy biggest gripe about it though would have to be that its replay value sucks. I quickly learned that apart from a few key decisions you make, most choices end up not being relevant because something terrible happens anyway.01/30/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_SkunkI *love* The Walking Dead. Like I said, I played Season 1 through in one go, and subsequently pre-purchased Season 2 in its entirety sight-unseen.01/30/2015 - 3:43pm
Andrew EisenBy the by, I take it you're a fan of Telltale's Walking Dead? I'm one of the very few who really doesn't like it. Bums me out.01/30/2015 - 3:39pm
Andrew EisenI think we're safe with stuff like Life is Strange, Resident Evil: Revelations 2, and TellTale's games. I was thinking more along the lines of D4. It's genuinely up in the air whether we'll get a conclusion to that story or not.01/30/2015 - 3:33pm
Goth_SkunkUltimately, from this potentially ignorant perspective, it's the gamer who assumes the risk, not the developer. I don't approve. Fortunately, I'm only paying $5 (CDN, no less), so that's money I can easily write off if I'm disappointed.01/30/2015 - 3:32pm
Goth_SkunkIf I'm wrong, and the unthinkable should happen where the developer ends up aborting production of the rest of the episodes, bundle purchasers would be understandably upset. Even moreso if attempting to get a refund turns out to be a hassle.01/30/2015 - 3:30pm
Goth_SkunkThere is an option on XBL to purchase all episodes in a bundle. Pay full price now, get the rest of the episodes as they're released. I would like to think this means that the other episodes are in fact done and ready.01/30/2015 - 3:29pm
Andrew EisenCatch 22 sometimes. Some gamers don't want to buy it if there's no guarantee the whole thing will come out and the whole thing can't come out unless enough people buy the early installments.01/30/2015 - 3:17pm
Goth_SkunkI sincerely hope this trend towards episodic games is not done so because the developer only had enough capital to produce the first 1/5th of the story and is banking on making enough money from the sales of that fifth to produce the rest.01/30/2015 - 3:16pm
Goth_SkunkThat being said, I want to try Life is Strange to get my feet wet.01/30/2015 - 3:13pm
Andrew EisenI'm that way too. I'll wait until the whole thing is out. Same goes for DVDs of TV shows. I'll wait for the season set.01/30/2015 - 3:13pm
Goth_SkunkIf an episodic game is really good, and the time between episodes is more than a week, I'm more inclined to wait for the rest of the episodes to all come out than to try playing it episode by episode at launch date.01/30/2015 - 3:12pm
Goth_SkunkAs someone who played through TWD Season 1 entirely in one day, and then played Season 2 episode by episode when they each came out, I strongly agree with this sentiment.01/30/2015 - 3:11pm
Goth_SkunkFrom what I've been hearing, people haven't been buying it because they're sick of episodic games where they have to wait 6 weeks or more between episodes and they'd rather just wait for the whole thing to come out at once.01/30/2015 - 3:10pm
Andrew EisenNot sure what GamerGate could do to dissuade people from buying a game they'd otherwise be interested in or why it would even want to but I agree, I think the premise is interesting and look forward to learning more about how it actually plays.01/30/2015 - 2:58pm
Goth_SkunkAnd for what it's worth, I saw Life is Strange advertised today on XBL, and the premise looks very, very intriguing. I'm going to buy it today and give it a shot.01/30/2015 - 2:42pm
Goth_SkunkI'm hearing rumours that the recently released game Life is Strange is not selling very well on Steam, and that GamerGate is being blamed as a result. It's just a rumour though.01/30/2015 - 2:42pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://smashboards.com/threads/apex-2015-venue-changed-competition-will-restart-tomorrow.388991/ twitch saves apex2015 tournament after original location gets condemned.01/30/2015 - 2:37pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician