Senator Jim DeMint Plans To Target FCC in Next Congress

December 23, 2010 -

Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) said today that the Federal Communications Commission should be renamed the "Fabricating a Crisis Commission," following its vote to approve new rules to regulate certain aspects of the internet. Later on in a blistering attack of the FCC's actions this week, DeMint said he will push for legislation that limits the power of the FCC to act on its own in enforcing rules.

"Proceeding on its own liberal whims rather than facts, this FCC has chosen to grant itself broad authority to limit how businesses can bring the internet to consumers in faster and more innovative ways," DeMint said in a lengthy statement.

He also said that these new rules "must be reversed" and that "regulatory reform will be a top priority for Republicans in the next Congress." DeMint is clearly going to take the FCC and other government agencies to task: "..I intend to prevent the FCC or any government agency from unilaterally burdening our recovering economy with baseless regulation."

For the FCC, DeMint has some specific legislation in mind to take the teeth out of the new rules, or roll them back entirely:

"In order to provide the stability businesses need to grow, I will work with my fellow senators to see passage of my FCC Act, which would ensure that the FCC can only use its rulemaking powers where there is clear evidence of a harmful market failure, as well as the REINS Act, which would add the accountability of a Congressional vote before any government agency’s proposed major regulations may be finalized."

Source: Washington Examiner

 


Comments

Re: Senator Jim DeMint Plans To Target FCC in Next Congress

Another moron that doesn't understand anything but money and politics. The FCC's ruling sucks, but this guy would pay the fox to guard to hen house.

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Senator Jim DeMint Plans To Target FCC in Next Congress

Re: Senator Jim DeMint Plans To Target FCC in Next Congress

This guy is an idiot. One of these "Smaller governement at any cost" types who really just wants to do the bidding of his corporate paymasters. My least favorite type of politician.

Do you know how screwed over we would be by the various telecom industries if it weren't for the FCC?

This guy can take a flying leap.

Re: Senator Jim DeMint Plans To Target FCC in Next Congress

Yep.

He's supported by the Koch family billionaires. Small Government to enrichen the ultra-wealthy is their agenda.

-- http://pixelantes.blogspot.com/

Re: Senator Jim DeMint Plans To Target FCC in Next Congress

Of course, by "small government" they actually mean "spend tons of money on the things WE want instead of the things THEY want".

There is no party of smaller government, just two parties who have different ideas about where we should direct our massive spending.

Re: Senator Jim DeMint Plans To Target FCC in Next Congress

I don't agree with the FCC's ruling, but for some reason I feel uneasy about this guy's ideas as well....

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAh, okay.07/31/2015 - 2:46pm
benohawkI'm saying that the refrence in the article to the old title would need to be changed well the primary point of the article would be kept the same. Not something that should be an issue if the objective wasn't to be provocative.07/31/2015 - 2:41pm
Andrew EisenYou're saying the article should be altered to fit a different title. I want to know what title you find more appropriate for the copy as is.07/31/2015 - 2:34pm
benohawkIt would take a minor rewrite to the article, but I'd call it 'What is a Gamer' but go for the same point. you don't have to sell to jerks07/31/2015 - 2:33pm
Andrew EisenI still say "clickbait" is thrown around way too casually, to the point where it's completely meaningless. That aside, what alternate title would you suggest?07/31/2015 - 2:22pm
benohawkt was still delibrate clickait, something I would expect from a Gawker outlet, the article would of likely been much better recieved with a nicer title07/31/2015 - 2:18pm
Andrew EisenProvocative title to be sure but I didn't find it inaccurate or not reflective of its text.07/31/2015 - 2:12pm
benohawkGamasutra shouldn't of gotten clicks for the article until they had published under an accurate name instead of some pathetic clickbaiting07/31/2015 - 2:09pm
benohawkThe title of the article meant that the article was worth ignoring, not launching a massive campaign to try and end the site it was on.07/31/2015 - 2:08pm
Andrew EisenI will Ouija him my unceasing indignation!07/31/2015 - 1:59pm
Infophile@AE: The fact that he's dead does a good job of ensuring he won't hear it.07/31/2015 - 1:59pm
InfophileGood to hear. Just wish everyone offended felt that way07/31/2015 - 1:58pm
Andrew EisenRoger Ebert will never hear the end of my disdain for his I Spit On Your Grave review! http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-spit-on-your-grave-198007/31/2015 - 1:57pm
Big PermI don't support the email campaigns. I wouldn't support a comics venue getting them because of being offended, so it'd be hipocritical for me to do it to those who offend me07/31/2015 - 1:53pm
Infophile(cont'd) if it could be proven, it wouldn't merit anywhere near what Alexander has gone through.)07/31/2015 - 1:49pm
InfophileYeah, we can't prove or disprove it. My beef is with those who use the assumed intent to justify the actions taken against Gamasutra and Alexander. If it can't be proven, it shouldn't be retaliated against like that. (Hell, with how mild this was, even...07/31/2015 - 1:49pm
Andrew EisenNo problem. We just prefer to keep the front page clean.07/31/2015 - 1:43pm
Big PermAndrew- Alright, didn't know before.07/31/2015 - 1:42pm
Andrew EisenBig Perm - Not that big a deal, but do try to refrain from the heavier expletives in the Shout box.07/31/2015 - 1:40pm
Big Perm@ Info. I disagree, but we're just both speculating on intent. Is it possible you're right? Sure, but I don't see you being able convince me by saying she would have offended differently07/31/2015 - 1:40pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician