Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on Arizona Killer

January 12, 2011 -

An article in Scientific American featuring comments from psychologist Craig Anderson (director of the Center for the Study of Violence at Iowa State University) and psychologist Christopher Ferguson (Texas A&M International University) comes to the conclusion that many in the media are drawing conclusions with little evidence when it comes to Arizona killer Jared Loughner.

While the media tries to say that Loughner was influenced by heavy metal music, angry political speech, and video games, both Anderson and Ferguson agree that more details on the individual are required to come to any kind of conclusion.

Here's what Anderson says about it:

"The problem in any specific case is that you can't really know for sure whether an incident would have happened had not there been, say, a lot of media violence exposure," says psychologist Craig Anderson, director of the Center for the Study of Violence at Iowa State University. "In this particular case, we can't really know whether such shootings would have taken place had there not been this recent history of fairly nasty political exchanges in the press."

Ferguson zeros in on video games:

"There is still some debate about whether it is a risk factor, and I would argue that it's not," Ferguson says of video games, noting that violent crimes among juveniles have been on the decline even as games have increased in both prevalence and graphicness.

Similarly, studies by Ferguson and by other researchers, such as economist Todd Kendall, have found a decrease in rates of rape that coincides with increased availability of pornography. "Once again you see this sort of inverse relationship across not just in the U.S. but in other countries as well between pornography consumption and the actual rates of sexual violence," Ferguson says. That does not mean that video games prevent violence, or that pornography curbs sexual crime, but it does highlight the difficulty in establishing a casual relationship between any one medium and a group's behavior, let alone the actions of an individual.

Ferguson goes on to say that many are being irresponsible:

"It's irresponsible in my opinion to start blaming anything until we know more about this individual," Ferguson says. "I think we're really rushing to judgment, and that's not to say that I like this kind of political speech. I find it atrocious, like everybody else."

Anderson agrees:

"I think it would be fair to say that when political discourse gets more and more strident, and when there are images portrayed on the Web where you have a scope sight as part of your attack on your political opponent, that isn't helpful. I think that's safe to say. But whether or not it plays any major causal role in any given case, it's just impossible to say."

Image source


Comments

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

I stumbled this week when I realized I was being a hypocrite.  I've been in opposition to the notion that violent media makes people violent, that playing a video game makes someone more likely to pick up a gun and shoot someone.  But when this tragedy broke, I was more than happy to jump on the bandwagon with blaming incendiary political discourse (like some Tea Party favorite saying we may need a "second amentment solution" to the health care reform debate, suggesting that maybe they should just arm themselves and shoot up people they disagree with) as a key factor in his decision to kill.  I hate the political climate today, there's no room for compromise.  And a lot of media personalities are feeding on the insecurities and fears of the people to push an "Us versus Them" mentality.  But I have to accept that this wasn't what caused him to kill.

Video games don't turn normal kids into sociopathic monsters, it just happens that sociopathic monsters are drawn to violent media.  They're already like that.  So too, this guy was off his rocker.  Maybe all the nasty rhetoric and conspiracy theorists fed into his delusions, but it didn't cause it.  Millions of normal people who listen to the Becks and Palins of the world, are appauled by what this man did.  Their opinions may be swayed, but they're not being brainwashed into doing violent criminal acts.

It's like another guy last year.  Avid Beck fan, became convinced that the gov't was coming to get him and his guns.  So when some police entered his appartment building one day, he killed 3 of them.  Beck may be an asshole, but he didn't make this guy kill those cops.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

It's true...it's always easy to point a facile finger of blame at something you don't value.  That's much of what fuels the video game moral panic.  My hats off to you for recognizing it (we all do it of course).  Now if only the rest of America could do the same...

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

Well, there's a subtle difference. Video games don't urge people to kill people. People on the far political right have been doing just that, with phrases like "We need a second amendment solution". The words "Who will rid me of this turbulent priest" come to mind. Murderous words, unlike violent video games, can lead to people getting killed.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

Which is why Incitment to Violence is not consitutionally protected, but violent storytelling is.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

And maybe, some day, people will understand that being drawn towards certain types of media because of your underlying issues is not the same thing as said media causing those underlying issues.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

Wow ! Craig Anderson and Christopher Ferguson actually agree on something... Doesn't happen very often.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

This guy, from what I've been reading, has a big language hard-on.  Unfortunately this is coupled with the fact that he is not as deep as he believes himself to be.  The reason that he shot Giffords in the first place is due to the fact that he had previously posed the question: "If words have no meaning then what is government?", and he didn't like her answer to his pseudo intellectual bullshit.  And apparently after that fact that he dropped Giffords name a LOT in conversation.  Because she couldn't answer his, uknown to him, meaningless bullshit he stewed on it endlessly.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

In an article about the dangers of speculating on the motives of the shooter, you speculate on the motives of the shooter. Thanks for the contribution to the betterment of society.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

Oh, well I guess we should ignore the fact that the people closest to him have said that he was completely obsessed with the congrress woman and the, in his words, inadequate answer to his question.

Instead lets just go, I DUNNO.  It is so much easier that way.  Thanks for hindering society.

Is it really so wrong to say that a crazy person was crazy?  Really?  You know sometimes things are cut and dry.  If a guy killed someone who slept with his wife, are we going to do some deep introspective and try to see if his mother hugged him enough when he was a child or some other crap and ignore the obvious?

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

I agree, that's not speculation, that's something he really was obsessed with.  And incident with his stupid question didn't "make him do it," rather it just focused his crazy vibes on Gifford.  Nobody's saying that he killed her because she couldn't answer his bullshit question, we're just noting that it created a (loose) history between the shooter and Gifford.  I think Erik's first post is valid.

Quite simply, he had mental issues and killed someone he didn't like.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

"Nobody's saying that he killed her because she couldn't answer his bullshit question..."

Is she dead? Last I heard she was doing okay.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

Exactly.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

I think once you throw in schizophrenia, everything else becomes pretty much meaningless.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

It's not too soon to judge the influences on him. The guy was a grade 1 nutter. Being a complete wack-job influenced him to kill. Anyone who has read his YouTube rants can see that this guy was at least as batshit-crazy as Dr. Strangelove's Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper. Jared Loughner's loony warnings about 'mind control'' sound a lot like Jack D. Ripper's fear of his 'precious bodily fluids' being sapped.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

How many friends does this guy actually have (or had)?  Did people go out of their way to include him in their circle or did they eschew him and mock him?  Any girlfriends or romantic relationships?  Close friends provide stability in a person's life even with unstable individuals.

- Left4Dead

Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

- Left4Dead Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

Re: Researchers Agree: Too Soon to Judge Influences on ...

 What I find fascinating about this particular case is that this guy turns out to be quite complex- with conspiracy theories, book/movie influences, and quirks that span all over the political spectrum.  This guy has aspects that identify with both the right and left as well as traits that each political dogma pruportes (spelling WTF) to hate.  

This guy is mentally unstable but also turns out to be a real person who can't be easily pigeon-holed into a particular designer strawman...regardless of what MSNBC, FoxNews, or the 700 Club would have us believe.

Sadly, considering that people were already pointing fingers at their favorite strawmen before the crime scene was even cleared, it proves that we are living in classy times indeed.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Adam802http://www.polygon.com/2014/4/18/5627928/newtown-video-game-addiction-forum04/18/2014 - 4:14pm
Matthew Wilsonit is a video talking about why certain games/products/consoles do well, and others do not. he back it up with solid research.04/18/2014 - 3:56pm
Andrew EisenI'm not keen on blind links. What is it?04/18/2014 - 3:45pm
Matthew Wilsonthis is worth a whatch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyXcr6sDRtw&list=PL35FE5C4B157509C904/18/2014 - 3:43pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician