Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

January 19, 2011 -

Correction:An earlier version of this story erroneously reported that Blizzard / Activision had served the maker of the World of StarCraft mod with a "Cease and Desist" letter. This was not the case, and we have corrected the record, headline, and story below to reflect that. Apologies to all parties involved. Corrected story below: 

Activision has made a copyright infringement claim on YouTube, successfully getting a mod makers video removed from the service. The developer of World of StarCraft, an online StarCraft 2 MMO mod that combines the lore and gameplay elements of both games. Naturally the mod maker known only as "Ryan" is hurt and shocked by this action. Speaking at length on the mod's official forum, Ryan appeals to Activision to give him a break:

"You created a tool that allowed us to do anything with your assets. You encouraged us to use your assets and were eager to see what we might come up with. You had to have seen this coming?" Ryan wrote on his forum. "I know it's hard to trust someone you've never met to piggyback on your own legacy. The brilliance of StarCraft combined with the multiplayer focus of World of Warcraft. You might be a little worried about your lore being butchered or, even more so, worried about a guy with no supervision tainting the name of your company with poor product."

"Let me assure you that I am in no way shape or form going to deliver anything less than complete perfection," he continued. "I've been following your work since Warcraft. I've worked with every editor you've put out since I was 13 years old."

"If you have a problem with what I am doing or would like to talk about it, I'm all ears. But please don't send me some messenger with a cease and desist letter."

Ryan admits that he has no legal basis and if Activision / Blizzard want his mod to disappear, inevitably it will. He says he will do whatever they want him to do, adding that getting it on Battle.net is key to the mod's success:

"If Blizzard/Activision doesn't want this to happen then it won't," he wrote. "This game HAS to be pumped through the veins of Battle.net to work. I hope and pray that we can come to an understanding here. If they want the name changed then I'll change it."

Later in the thread he proves that he has not violated Blizzard's policy on videos. This could just be Activision policy as it relates to YouTube, which can easily be appealed by Ryan. According to this thread he has contacted Blizzard and is awaiting a response.

Source: RPS by way of Eurogamer


Comments

Re: Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

Looks like the only thing Blizzard wants is the name changed, looks like they are going to let him keep the mod going, just have to change the name.

 

GP seems to love stories where gamers are 'victims' its like crack for them.

Re: Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

I wonder if perhaps this is a subtle clue that a real, official World of Starcraft is already in development?

Re: Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

Where can I find the aforementioned Diablo-resembling StarCraft 1 based RPGs?

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

 Yay I can post now. Unfortunately, this post is not accurate. :/ Ryan never received a cease and desist letter. The only thing that happened was Activision telling YouTube that he was violating copyrights, and having them take down the World of Starcraft video. To be honest, this was probably just an over-zealous Activision legal troll, as the video that was posted does not violate Blizzard's video policy in the least (see: http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/legal/videopolicy.html).

Ryan has contacted Blizzard and is waiting for an official response, but I would doubt his mod is an issue, other than maybe him having to change the name of it for obvious reasons. RPGs were created for the original Starcraft that resembled Diablo, and there was a World of Warcraft mod for Warcraft III that was made. This isn't any different than those, and Blizzard didn't take issue.

More info can be found in his official forum: http://www.worldofstarcraft.proboards.com/

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

It may not have even been one of Activision's legal trolls. Youtube's anti-infringement scripts have been known to be trigger-happy at times, as Blizzard themselves found out when Youtube autodeleted a video from Blizzard's channel for apparently violating their own copyright.

Either way, more info is definitely needed here.
---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.


---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Some trolls do make use of it by filing false reports.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Thanks for the correction! :)

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

True, and as said, this is on Activision, not Blizzard. Blizzard is likely cool with it.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

This is one of those times where I wish there were no such thing as an NDA.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

 WTF, seriously.  After all the talking up Blizzard did over how great the SC modding community would be thanks to their tools and even allowing creators to SELL their work through Battle.net, they pull this crap?  Either someone was lying from the outset or someone at Activision legal wasn't listening.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

This one is on Activision, not Blizzard. We can probably expect addon support for WoW to be done away with next.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Blizzard made the promises and Activision reneged. This is the fear that we all had when they merged coming to fruition.

- When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you.

- When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Did you really expect Blizzard to be able to keep any of their promises or to have any prior policies survive the purchase by Activision?

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Ok, my internal debate was short-lived. If Win10 is still a year out, I'm not waiting that long for an SSD, so on Win7 I will remain.09/30/2014 - 7:52pm
Matthew Wilsonits called windows 10, and I am happy to get the start menu back.09/30/2014 - 7:18pm
Jessy HartIs this stuff about Windows 10 legit? Is it actually called Windows 10 or is it just some stupid joke?09/30/2014 - 6:57pm
ZippyDSMleeSo I been trying to play Bioshock Infinite I got all the DLC,ect but do not want the extras to make your charatcer over powered from the start.....they force you to take them which is quite annoying......09/30/2014 - 6:45pm
Craig R.I need to upgrade to an SSD, still seriously debating moving to Win8.1 from 7 at the same time09/30/2014 - 6:07pm
Craig R.Win10 is probably Win8.1 with more cleanup and the Start button back.09/30/2014 - 6:06pm
Sora-ChanAhh, it's just weird seeing someone's post all of a sudden have replies from days prior before it was posted due to that.09/30/2014 - 5:49pm
MechaTama31sora: I broke the ordering intentionally, as AE's and my conversation had squeezed the text boxes down to be quite slim. I replied to an earlier post of his instead of the one I was actually replying to.09/30/2014 - 5:46pm
MechaTama31So, 9 would have been the good one, but they are skipping it to do two crap ones in a row?09/30/2014 - 5:41pm
Sora-ChanSo, judging from the poll post for #gamergate, it looks like too many thread replies breaks the ordering of posts, as seen with the recent post from Infophile.09/30/2014 - 5:31pm
Andrew EisenOr no! It wasn't Y3K compliant. Microsoft thought it best to super future proof its OS and skipped straight to 10 which is Y3K compliant!09/30/2014 - 5:01pm
Andrew EisenJust tell them it wasn't Y2K compliant.09/30/2014 - 5:00pm
Craig R.Looking forward to having to explain to coworkers down the road what ever happened to 9 *sigh*09/30/2014 - 4:57pm
Craig R.2k was crap. XP was solid, 7 is good, 8.1 is actually really good once you make it look like 7 :)09/30/2014 - 4:52pm
Sora-Chan@MP As someone who has used each version of windows since 3.1... I prefer Vista over 7 for various reasons. The only thing I give 7 over Vista is preformance. They really screwed up a bunch of things when making 7. Also, XP was a pain. 2k was better.09/30/2014 - 4:13pm
Jessy Hart@E. Zachary Knight Is that show called Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures?09/30/2014 - 3:34pm
IanCWin 8 isn't bad, it just can't decide whether to be a desktop OS or a tablet OS.09/30/2014 - 2:40pm
IanCI think its a way of getting round giving it free to Win 8 users...09/30/2014 - 2:39pm
MaskedPixelanteWindows alternates between bad and good versions. XP was good, Vista sucked, 7 was good, 8 sucked, therefore 10 will suck, QED.09/30/2014 - 2:18pm
E. Zachary KnightPerhaps they are calling it "10" because on a scale of 1-10 of how awesome it is, it is a clear 10.09/30/2014 - 2:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician