Writers Guild of America Tackles Game Award Criticism

February 4, 2011 -

The Writers Guild of America is speaking out about criticism that video game writers have to pay money and sign up for a membership to win the Writers Guild Award for games. In an editorial on GameIndustry.biz, the chair of the Writers Guild of America's Videogame Writers Caucus, Micah Wright claims, "you do not have to be a member of our guild to win our award."

"We ask that all entrants join the Videogame Writers Caucus (VWC), but that is not the same thing as being a member of the WGA," says Wright.

The problem is, the VWC does require a $60 annual fee, which buys a membership. The money does give the submitter access to free film screenings and a subscription to the WGA's Written By Magazine, but it's still a fee.

"The WGA is a Guild primarily supported by the mandatory union dues of our film and television member-writers," adds Wright. "A writer who works on, say, Pirates of the Caribbean 4, will contribute 2% of their salary to the union, which in the case of a film like that might be in the range of $100,000."

"The idea that anyone thinks the WGA is somehow getting rich off of $60 fees from videogame writers is laughable," Wright continued.

The award does have other requirements besides the $60 fee and mandatory membership. Those that want to be considered have to submit a "script with writers' names on it" because the organization is "not clairvoyant" and "can't magically peer into some Developer's internal business structure and divine who wrote what."

Wright goes on to say that many game studios have refused to submit a script even though VCW has "gone to great lengths to make it easy for them to do."

Apparently, some of the companies that have refused to submit a script include BioWare and Take-Two. Wright claims that BioWare "refused to submit a script for either Mass Effect 2 or Dragon Age this year" and Take-Two "refused to submit a script for Red Dead Redemption." Wright says that these three games would have likely been finalists had the aforementioned companies complied.

Source: GI.biz


Comments

Re: Writers Guild of America Tackles Game Award Criticism

Every article I've seen thus far has made such a big deal out of the $60, but it has nothing to do with the amount. The fact that you have to be a member of this organization at all to be recognized as having the best writing in a video game more or less undermines the entire point of the award. It goes from "Best Writing in a Video Game" to "Best Writing by a VWC Member." Who the hell cares about that?

The fact that a game like Force Unleashed 2 could win this award over games like Mass Effect 2 or Red Dead Redemption, based solely on the fact that Bioware and Rockstar are not members of the VWC basically makes this award worthless.

I don't see why anyone would join this one specific organization just to win this one specific award....surely those who are already members have some other beneficial reason for being members. It just seems silly for this organization to try and goad these companies into joining by publicly ridiculing them for not wanting to pay the $60, as if that in itself is the deal-breaker.

Re: Writers Guild of America Tackles Game Award Criticism

Are you aware that you have to be a member of the Academy in order to win an Oscar?  Same with the SAG awards.  Just what the film industry has done for what? 80+ Years?  Oh and they have the right to do so.

http://www.deathvanquished.blogspot.com

Re: Writers Guild of America Tackles Game Award Criticism

im with natas, this reward i doubt has much clout behind it.

Re: Writers Guild of America Tackles Game Award Criticism

I don't see a problem at all. If Bioware or 2K doesn't submit the game script or pay the fee then they shouldn't be nominated.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Writers Guild of America Tackles Game Award Criticism

Me?  I'm just sick of organizations that do not understand gaming trying to judge gaming.

A submitted script does not truly reflect on how the writing is eventually delivered to the end user; as a tester every design doc I've ever seen is woefully outdated as soon as we recieve it, I imagine the same to be true of scripts.

Play the effing games if you want any credibility; I'm sure you can find some out-of-work writer to judge it for 60 dollars in booze money.

In addition: Games are almost never completely written by a single person.  Especially in RPGs different areas will be written by different people.  Game developers have better things to do than pander for some meaningless award (what with the previous nominees like WET it certainly doesn't mean a whole lot to me).

-Gamepolitics' sign up procedure sucks balls. Approve this *flips off admin*; I wanted to make this comment days ago.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew Eisen(Ghostbusters is my favorite movie, if anyone was wondering why I'm so unusually excited for this project.)06/30/2015 - 7:01pm
Andrew EisenI am so completely over-the-moon with excitement for the new Ghostbusters movie! It's going to absolutely destroy me if it sucks. Long wait. Fingers crossed!06/30/2015 - 7:00pm
Goth_SkunkAdditionally, the entry really doesn't have much of a point to it. It's just a long, rambling rant akin to what an angsty high-school student would write on their facebook page.06/30/2015 - 6:51pm
MonteAnd most of those viewpoints just so happen to revolve around women and topics that feminists cover, and not actual gaming journalism.06/30/2015 - 6:51pm
Goth_Skunk@DocMelonhead: First off, thanks for using an archive. Second, I would argue that Miss Alexander doesn't know the right women. Given the members of her echo-chamber, I don't find that surprising in the least.06/30/2015 - 6:50pm
Goth_Skunk@Monte: GamerGate does not focus attention on feminists; it focuses its attention on viewpoints it happens to disagree with. The fact that most of those opinions happen to come from radical feminists is a coincidence.06/30/2015 - 6:31pm
Andrew EisenBut hey, we all make bad videos from time to time. I'm certainly not going to hold that single one against her.06/30/2015 - 6:31pm
Andrew EisenAh, okay. I probably don't read their blogs or follow them on Twitter so I've never heard anything they've had to say. The only thing I know about Sommers is the video we reported on a while back and I certainly wouldn't classify that as scholarly!06/30/2015 - 6:30pm
Goth_SkunkAlso, "junior campus feminist" is a young (late teens to late 20's, hence "junior") college student radical activist (see Emma Sulkowicz as an example). This, as opposed to a more mature, scholarly feminist like Sommers.06/30/2015 - 6:24pm
Andrew EisenNo, because "feminisim" isn't a group. There are feminist groups with leaders though.06/30/2015 - 6:23pm
Goth_SkunkDoes Feminism have a leader?06/30/2015 - 6:19pm
Andrew EisenWell, maybe the SPJ Airplay discussion will be just what everyone needed and we'll all live happily ever after!06/30/2015 - 6:16pm
MonteFrankly, for those in it for jounalism, the best thnig they can do is forget GG and find a new Tag. By using GG theybring with themselves all of the baggage that comes with it, and thus no one listens to them. They voices would go farthar without trolls06/30/2015 - 6:12pm
MonteThing is with internaet movements, their is no leadership or membership which means ANYONE can define it and use it as they please. No one member gets to sayhis version is right and everyone else is wrong because his claim is just as valid as theirs06/30/2015 - 6:10pm
MonteGamergate's menaing varies from person to person. Some pretty much allign it with MRA's. Other's do it because they want to defend developers from feminists who criticize their work. This has nothing to do with journalism but gets the Tag anyway06/30/2015 - 6:08pm
DocMelonheadGoth, Take a look at this: It's old, but got a point form the "Gamers are Over" blogger herself: https://web.archive.org/web/20150530072314/http://boingboing.net/2015/05/29/all-the-women-i-know-in-video.html06/30/2015 - 6:08pm
Monte@Goth, What you just described GG to be has nothing to do with feminism, and yet GG focus's their attention on feminists. REAL examples of bad jounralism often forgotten, while feminists reamin a constant target06/30/2015 - 6:03pm
Andrew EisenSuggesting such doesn't automatically make one not a feminist. And what the heck is a "junior campus feminist"?06/30/2015 - 6:02pm
Goth_SkunkIt's fine to disagree. It's entirely another to suggest that Sommers is a proponent of rape culture or a puppet of the Patriarchy. Not that you yourself have made any such claims Andrew, but junior campus feminists certainly have.06/30/2015 - 6:01pm
Andrew EisenFeminists can disagree with each other. That doesn't mean one is a feminist and one isn't.06/30/2015 - 6:00pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician