Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against Activision Can Proceed

February 15, 2011 -

The Los Angeles Times reports that Activision has lost its bid to get a lawsuit filed by ska-rockers No Doubt thrown out. A three-judge panel rejected the company's motion to throw out the 2009 lawsuit that alleged breach of contract.

The group contends that the breach occurred when Activision allowed players of Band Hero to use band members' avatars to "perform songs they did not write." The band said in its lawsuit that this "transformed No Doubt band members into a virtual karaoke circus act."

In its appeal of the suit, Activision said that it was simply a matter of "creative expression." The three-judge panel apparently disagreed.

No Doubt can now proceed with its lawsuit.


Comments

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

I'm wondering if No Doubt is worried that their in-game avatars performing another artist's songs could be construed as an unauthorized performance and they could be on the hook for licensing fees for said performance?

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

 But I thought No Doubt already was a circus act?  

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Yeah...because when Gwen Stefani sings "Ring of Fire" in real life she miraculously sounds like Johnny Cash.  It's quite a spectacle you need to see in concert.

(EDIT:  this was meant as a reply to Greevar...but I failed at button clicking)

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Right, because no band ever performs another group's songs in live concert ever.

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Is virtual karaoke circus act that much of an insult to No Doubt?

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Nope, No Doubt is an insult to virtual karaoke circus acts. 

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Probably less an 'insult' and more a 'we gave you permission to use our assets for X and Y, but not Z.. you used them for Z, now we are annoyed'

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

I just want to know what rock No Doubt was living under, that it came as any surprise to them.  Had they really never seen a (whatever) Hero game before?

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

I think it all comes down to what was in that contract.  If they gave persmission for use of their assets in specific ways and did not give it in others, then regardless of what else has been put into the game, Activision would not have had permission to do so.

When dealing with stuff like this it is not unusual to put in artist-specific code branches.

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Activision is already retirign the Guitar Hero serie,s os, not liek they're doing any real damage other than financial.

 

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Nah, even if the Guitar Hero series continues it won't be doing much either. Not like people are going to stop playing the game just because they used someone's likeness without official paperwork.

Even if No Doubt fans somehow "boycotts" the game, it won't last long either, see: Modern Warfare 2. 

Re: Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against ...

Honestly ,even if I was still a fan of them I wouldn't boycott the game, I'd get it because I'd think being able to play as a favorite rock star is a selling point.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician