School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts Controversy

March 1, 2011 -

Checkerboarded Studios is testing the boundaries of good taste and free speech with a new game modification for Half-Life 2 where the goal is partake in a school shooting called School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 (thanks Andrew Eisen). The Escapist caught up with mod maker known only as "Pawnstick," who attempted to explain the motivation of creating such a mod.

The gist of his comments on the game are not about how shocking, horrible, or in bad taste a mod such as his is, but about how there haven't been any exciting games representing school shootings. He calls Super Columbine Massacre "fucking boring." His inspiration for the mod came from Bully: Source, which he says tries to "educate the player" and calls "almost always fucking garbage."

Here is what he had to say about media coverage of Columbine:

 

"I think the media tried to cover it in a way that made the events more dramatic than they actually were. Even in my younger age, I saw right through most of it. The way the news victimized the victims and overplayed the evil of the shooters disgusted me more than the actual shootings themselves. The fact of the matter is, I never knew any of the victims, or anybody else who attended the schools. It affected me as much as hearing about the quakes in Haiti. Which is to say, not very much at all."

And a bit more on his research for the mod:

"To be honest, most of the research consisted of simply Googling the shooters and their weapons. A Columbine Site helped us out with some of the weapons from the Columbine shootings. The maps, however, aren't actually based on any school in particular. The maps are all designed with gameplay in mind. If any of the maps end up accidentally matching the dimensions of some real-life school, it will be by total coincidence."

Commentary: Freedom of speech aside, it sounds like this mod is being made just to create a mod to be controversial. Perhaps it is just savvy marketing because media types like us and anti-game media outlets will eat it up. Regardless of the fallout, School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 is in poor taste and comes out at a time when the industry does not need this kind of attention.

Source: The Escapist


Comments

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

This game is unoubtedly tasteless, it's clear that he doesn't care about school shootings at all and just wants to stir up controversy for free publicity. However, it's just a personal mod, from the looks of things it will be hosted on a personal website. It has nothing to do with the games industry and he has every right to make it available. By the same token, he will have to accept the tsunami of criticism that comes his way for making such a tasteless game. 

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

This is why we should ban the sale of games to minors! That way, they will just get it from torrents instead!

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

Troll wants feeding.

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

I can see Fox News salivating already for this game, blaming the entire industry, the ESRB and claiming that the game is aimed for 4 years old and is gonna to be sale on WalMart, and that is gonna be the next hot game of the year along with Rapelay, Grand Theft Auto 3 and Custer´s Revenge. 

If they were doing the game in a more satiric tone, maybe it would be more defendeble, but this mod is doing the things way too easy for the anti-games crowd.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

I actually agree with the highly reactionary lot, but that's because the issues that appear on this site are ones we are personally invested in, and some of us aren't as classy as others. We have a very immature vocal minority, much like any other group.

 

I kind of figured someone would do something like this with the CA law still in limbo. It's just too much of a bright light for media moths and attention seekers to ignore.

I can only hope (vainly) that the media has learned to distinguish between user-created mods and games sold in stores at this point. But I feel that we'll have a fox news exclusive within the next week talking about how your kids can walk into wal mart and buy a game to practice killing thier classmates.

 

 

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

I read this article yesterday, and this report pnly scratches the surfrace of what this guy said.  I was surprised and put off by a lot of things.  I was especially surprised that he actually wanted the CA law to be upheld!:

"It is my hope that the bill passes. I'd be surprised if it doesn't. The type of kids who are especially eager to get their hands on violent games - who would attempt to thwart store policies by using fake IDs or dragging their friend's parents along to approve the purchase - probably shouldn't be playing the games in the first place. As much as gamers may have hated Jack Thompson (And as misguided and misinformed at the guy may have been), the point still stands that video games have the potential to impact certain susceptible minds. Yes, so do film and television and the rest of the media, as many gamers are eager to point out. But that doesn't actually negate the fact that games do, in fact, have an impact."

Maybe they do, but he fails to understand the potential chilling effect this law would have if it does pass.  Sounds to me that he'd love to see the entire game industry go down in flames.

He later goes on to say:

"Gamers are a generally misguided, highly reactionary lot. Back when Jack Thompson was still hot news, in their vain attempts to discredit him, a large quantity of them made threats against him and cursed his name. Which, of course, only served to strengthen his position in the eyes of non-gamers. Watching gamers threaten us with violence, in order to stop us from making our admittedly violent game, is an amusing bit of irony."

You know, I'll admit, I didn't think it helped our case either when I saw people openly threatening JT, or for that matter Leland Yee or any other anti-gaming pundit.  But to say that we're a "misguided, highly reactionary lot" is unfair.

He said this about whether he had any sympathy for the victims:

"I think the media tried to cover it in a way that made the events more dramatic than they actually were. Even in my younger age, I saw right through most of it. The way the news victimized the victims and overplayed the evil of the shooters disgusted me more than the actual shootings themselves. The fact of the matter is, I never knew any of the victims, or anybody else who attended the schools. It affected me as much as hearing about the quakes in Haiti. Which is to say, not very much at all."

I can sort of understand where he's coming from here, as the news does tend to overplay things.  I didn't have family in Haiti, or for that matter knew anyone who died in 9/11 or Hurricane Katrina.  So I wasn't as emotionally invested as I would have been if I did.

Still, it's human nature to feel bad when a tragedy befalls your fellow man.  So even if I didn't know anyone, I still felt some degree of sorrow or sympathy.  That's just what you do.

In the end, I had to ultimately agree with the commenters on this article that the guy was probably a troll and saying these things just to provoke.  That's the only way it would have made any sense.

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

Though he kinda has a point.. treating this one particular type of event as sacred, something that you MUST have a 'higher purpose' in order to touch, is another thing that hurts the industry.


While we like to say 'games can be high art, they can educate!' as a way to defend games, it comes at a cost.  Embedded in the concept is that only high art has a right to exist or that high art is of more value the other types, and by saying that games are important because they can be like this is also to say that games that are not, well, are not... it also communicates that games need to justify themselves and the industry is agreeing with this.

Re: School Shooter: North American Tour 2012 Courts ...

Well I for one have never heard of "Checkerboarded Studios," and I anticipate not hearing anything else about them after this poorly-conceived mod has come and gone.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenNow, having said that, what sites are you reading that are claiming that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem" or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"? Or was that hyperbole too?09/21/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenFirst of all, ONE person in the Shout box suggested an obligation to call harassers out on their harassing but only after YOU brought it up. Plus, Techno said "when you see it happening." If you don't see it, you're not under any obligation.09/21/2014 - 1:02am
Sleaker@Craig R. - at this point I don't even know what the hashtags are suppsed to be in support of. what does GamerGate actually signify.09/21/2014 - 12:21am
Sleaker@AE - Hyperbole for the first 2, but it seems like some of the comments in the shout are attempting to place blame on fellow gamers because they aren't actively telling people to stop harassing even though they don't necessarily know anyone that has.09/21/2014 - 12:16am
Andrew EisenSleaker - Who the heck are you reading that is claiming "all gamers are bad," we "need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers," that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem," or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"?09/20/2014 - 9:44pm
erthwjimhe swatted more than just krebs, I think he swatted 30 people http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/teen-arrested-for-30-swattings-bomb-threats/09/20/2014 - 9:31pm
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician