Pawlenty: We Need Curriculum that Fees Like Call of Duty 3

Speaking at Iowa State University this week, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R) said that one of the best ways to deal with the ever-escalating costs of a higher education might be found in video games and technology. Pawlenty is on the stump because – many believe – he will take a run at becoming president in 2012. Pawlenty mentioned remote learning during a brief question & answer session with ISU Republicans. His answer was in response to a question about how he reconciles his goal of improving education with spending cuts.

"Let’s say you can scale the best Econ 101 lecture and not a lecture, not some guy standing in a room lecturing but let’s say it has all the sights and sounds and video and visual components of Call of Duty 3, but now it’s Econ 101. Or instead of learning about WW II, you’re fighting in WW II."

He argued that students could access curriculum available from any university in the world online, for a fraction of the cost of attending a traditional university course. He added that Minnesota spent billions of dollars on university buildings, paid salaries, pensions and more to support the state’s educational system. Pawlenty also suggested that the private sector might do a better job of providing a digital curriculum without the cost of public infrastructure and staff.

It’s an interesting concept, but the devil is usually in the details.

Pawlenty added that technology would not replace traditional universities, because students need socialization and sports teams.

Source: Des Moines Register

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on RedditEmail this to someone


  1. 0
    ddrfr33k says:

    Former Governor Pawlenty.  Mark Dayton is the new Guv.


    Pawlenty actually attends my church.  Met him after services a couple of times.  Nice guy and all, but I question some of his political motivations.  The one I’ve talked to doesn’t always mesh with the one I see on the "vidya screen."


    And for the record, I think Pawlenty signed the "fine the buyer" bill because vetoing a bill that one of his colleagues wrote would likely kill his career.  Especially when he’s rallied for the author and vice versa.  I don’t go to the same services as him anymore, and talking politics in church is just bad form.  So I haven’t had the opportunity to speak my mind on this with him.

    I’d love to continue debate on the state of MN politics with anyone interested, but this comment board is likely not the best place to do so.

Leave a Reply