ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

March 17, 2011 -

Responding to public comments from Australian Home Affairs Minister Brendan O'Connor about the desire to have a consensus about an R18+ game classification at July's SCAG meeting, the Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) has come out swinging. The ACL issued a statement saying that the ban on games that require a classification higher than the current rating of R15 should continue as it is.

First, let's look at what Brendan O'Connor said to ABC Australia:

"We're becoming the laughing stock of the developed world, where we're the only country that doesn't have an R18 classification level for video games," he said. "I foreshadow that if there is not a consensus around this issue, the Commonwealth will certainly be considering other options because we cannot continue to have an outdated classification system that's actually, in my view, causing harm to young people."

O'Connor pledged to not let this issue go - mainly because the general public has called for it:

"I'm not going to let this matter end because it's too important to allow one or two jurisdictions to stop the majority of jurisdictions in this country moving on an important reform," O'Connor said. "But can I say my very strong preference is to have consensus around the table in July."

The Australian Christian Lobby is leading the charge against the R18+ classification, claiming that it will make it easier for children to access violent games. Here is what they said in response to O'Connor:

"The Minister for Home Affairs, Brendan O’Connor, is continuing the push for an R18+ computer game classification with his recent comments which could open the way for games containing extreme interactive violence and sex to be more readily available in Australia.

Currently these types of games are Refused Classification but, as the Minister has admitted, some have been wrongly classified and allowed into the MA15+ category.

Commercial gaming interests are pushing for the ban on R18+ to be lifted and Mr O’Connor wants this to occur when Censorship Ministers meet at the SCAG (Standing Committee of Attorneys General) in July.

ACL believes it would be counterproductive for SCAG to pre-empt the review of the broken National Classification Scheme which Mr O’Connor and the Attorney General, Robert McClelland, announced before Christmas.

ACL does not accept the argument that introducing an R18+ category for games would protect children as it would be naive to think that children would not get a hold of them.

All of the State and Territory Children’s Commissioners told a Government inquiry last year that the ban on an R18+ classification should remain."

Commentary: I really only have a couple of comments for the ACL: You cannot legislate morality or support censorship of free speech. Encouraging the ban of creative works is tantamount to the government of the Soviet Union banning the Bible and religion in the 1970's. It's censorship under the guise of protecting children. Children should be protected, but adults should have the right to buy games because - as most religions claim - mankind has free will. Support free will.

Thanks to Uncharted NES for the links.


Comments

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

Doesn't the Bible have a few violent scenes in it?

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

"Currently these types of games are Refused Classification but, as the Minister has admitted, some have been wrongly classified and allowed into the MA15+ category." 

Take a look at the list of baned games in Australia, it is surprisingly short. The majority of titles that should be R18+ are rated as MA15+. The purpose of a classification system ought to be to provide ratings, rather than censoring content. Just because that is what you want it to be doesn't make it so.

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

Yes, but it doesn't show how many of the MA15+ rated games were revised to avoid getting banned.

-- http://pixelantes.blogspot.com/

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

I say let these people keep talking. I don't care how religuous you are, most people would read this and immediatly proclaim "zealot" and move on with their lives.

Who I really feel bad for is the children of this ACL gas bag.

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

Religion poisons everything. 

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

Ahem, no, just the crazy ones do thank you very much.

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

To be honest, they are all crazy. If you believe in the great Sky Spirit of any color or kind then you are not exactly sane, are you? 
Its not just the "crazy" ones, whole swaths of religious people support what the church tells them to support. If the pastor says "Videogames are poising the youth, we must ban the R18 classification!" then lots of normal, non-pamphlet handing out type people will parrot the same thing.

The funny thing is that these games are just pirated instead, freely and with no ID check in the comfort of their own home. Or imported. Or bought through an online service.

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

Sadly, it's the crazy ones that are most vocal and tend to be viewed as the speakers for <insert religion here>.

 

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

Dear Lord! This is an embarrassment to Christians everywhere!

Yeah, censoring games is just like censoring religion. Why do you think we, in the U.S. put Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, and Peaceful Assembly all in one Amendment?

Re: ACL Attacks O'Conner for Comments on R18+ Classification

While your at it repeal any and all equal treatment and fair rights to Aborigines and women!


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
quiknkoldI'm 7 years old, and my cousin(Also 7, maybe 8 at this time) tells me has Battletoads. its Summer Vacation. We play and play and play until finally, We won coop. Those were the days.09/23/2014 - 5:29pm
quiknkoldlets take a moment to share some gaming memories, shall we?09/23/2014 - 5:28pm
MechaTama31I buy stuff off the eshop because it gives me the convenience of a flashcart without the guilt.09/23/2014 - 5:03pm
Montewell thanks for the info Eisen; try that the next time i need something off the eshop09/23/2014 - 3:54pm
james_fudgere: MP, i've sent tech support a note - thank you :)09/23/2014 - 3:14pm
IanCNah that wasnt directed at you Andrew :)09/23/2014 - 3:00pm
Papa MidnightRe: SIEGE 2014 Keynote: oh dear...09/23/2014 - 2:44pm
MaskedPixelanteDear GP, something called "doubleverify" is causing some nasty browser issues on my end. Probably one of your ads.09/23/2014 - 2:36pm
Andrew EisenOh hell no. No, it took Nintendo a dog's age just to get to the point its competitors have been at for a while! (And it's still not there yet, in a lot of respects.)09/23/2014 - 2:26pm
IanCSame as PSN handles it, fi you are trying to say only nintendo do that.09/23/2014 - 2:23pm
Andrew EisenYou have to try to purchase something first. Pick a game, hit purchase and if your wallet doesn't have enough to cover it, you'll be given an option to "add exact funds" or something like that.09/23/2014 - 2:05pm
MonteI have seen no option for that on my 3DS; anytime i want to add funds it only gives me the option to add in denominations of $10, 20, 50 or 10009/23/2014 - 2:03pm
IanCWhat Andrew Wilson said. PSN is the same when you make a purchase over a certain price (£5 in the UK)09/23/2014 - 2:02pm
Andrew EisenNeither eShop charges sales tax either. At least in California.09/23/2014 - 2:00pm
Andrew EisenBoth Wii U and 3DS eShops allow you to add funds in the exact amount of whatever's in your shopping cart. If your game is $39.99, you can add exactly $39.99.09/23/2014 - 1:57pm
Infophile@Matthew Wilson: As I understand it, any regulations to force tax online would also set up an easy database for these stores to use, minimizing overhead.09/23/2014 - 1:30pm
MonteReally, the eshop just does next to nothing to make buying digitally advantagous for the customer. Its nice to have the game on my 3DS, but i can get more for less buying a physical copy at retail. And that's not even counting buying used09/23/2014 - 1:18pm
MonteIanC, The Eshop wallet system only lets you add funds in set denominations and the tax makes sure you no longer have round numbers so you ALWAYS loose money. A $39.99 game for instance requires you to add $50 instead of just $4009/23/2014 - 1:13pm
Matthew Wilsonbut thats just it those sites, even the small ones, sell all over the country.09/23/2014 - 11:12am
Neenekoeither that or it would follow the car model of today. big ticket items are taxed according to your residence, not where you buy them.09/23/2014 - 11:07am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician