Ngmoco: Sony 'In Trouble' in the 'Hardware World'

March 21, 2011 -

In a recent interview with Industry Gamers, mobile game developer and publisher Ngmoco's top executive said that Sony's hardware is in real trouble. Ngmoco founder Neil Young said that he thinks Sony could be "out of position" and "in trouble" in the hardware market and that Microsoft maybe eating its lunch. Young pointed to developing technologies having an effect on the game industry, and which companies had kept up with those changes.

"In the hardware world, I think Sony's massively out of position. I think they’re in trouble. I think Microsoft's in much better shape," he told Industry Gamers.

"They understand cloud computing; the Xbox Live service is a world-class service, and they've got a foothold in mobile, albeit a tenuous one. I think they're in better shape. I think Nintendo always has the benefit of its franchises, but I don't think it ends up being a really rich ecosystem for third parties."

While Young is making those arguments, it should be pointed out that Sony is looking to the future in some areas; earlier this month Sony put in place the first step in using cloud computing to store data - giving users 150 MB each to store up to 1000 save files.

Source: IndustryGamers


Comments

Re: Ngmoco: Sony 'In Trouble' in the 'Hardware World'

Talking about videogame hardware companies is about as dicey as discussing religion or politics, which is both unfortunate and stupid.  

Sega and Atari both were once at the top of the world in the games industry, and undid it all in part to poor hardware decisNintendo has made hardware missteps in the past and managed to find a way to recover.

Sony is by no means a Sega or Atari- they have the industry clout and the means to recover from their current rut and learn from their mistakes.  The problems with the PS3 was that they gave too much control over the project to Kutagari (who earned that trust with the success of the Playstation brand up to that point) who overengineered the thing which necessitated a high launch price and tricky development.  He already has been relegated to the background.  I expect future Playstation hardware to be more responsibly designed. 

Re: Ngmoco: Sony 'In Trouble' in the 'Hardware World'

The PS3 hardware is a complete disasaster.  It came out a year later and costed $100 more yet is arguably inferior to 360 in graphics capability.  (at least they didn't release the banana controller)  It is amazing just how much the Sony name holds up that they were able to nearly match the 360 in sales.  

Hopefully Sony does better with their next console.  It would be bad if Xbox didn't have any competition.  

 

Pwnage of Empires Xbox 360 Indie RTS

Re: Ngmoco: Sony 'In Trouble' in the 'Hardware World'

The Wii came out a year later and is almost a generation behind the competition and had no problem trouncing it.

No, the PS3 practically broke it's ankle out of the starting gate, and almost died that first two years, but miraculously recovered. It's doing better now, amazingly. It never had ground to lose against MS, and actually gained a little, if any. If Sony was going to die (hardware-wise), it would have already.

Many compared the PS3 to the Saturn, but don't expect the PS4 to be their Dreamcast. Sony isn't Sega. They're from two different worlds.

Re: Ngmoco: Sony 'In Trouble' in the 'Hardware World'

From all i've read about the two consoles hardware capabilities: they're roughly equal overall.

The 360 has a clearly superior GPU to the PS3, and a CPU easier to write for.

The PS3 has an inferior GPU, but an unusual CPU design that can pick up the slack on the GPU side and possibly overtake if the software is coded perfectly. It's much harder to get working to high efficiency, but has potentially more processing power.

To be honest, i wouldn't want to call it, since the systems differ greatly in design and yet give roughly equal performance. it's safest to just call a draw in my opinion.

Re: Ngmoco: Sony 'In Trouble' in the 'Hardware World'

"...arguably inferior to 360 in graphics capability."

Huh.  Never heard anyone make that argument before.  I've seen some sloppy ports (Bayonetta) but nothing to suggest that the 360 could trounce the PS3 in the graphics department.

 

Andrew Eisen

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameWilson: how? Im still waiting for my upgrade notice07/29/2015 - 3:44am
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician