EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitative'

March 22, 2011 -

Ben Cousins, General Manager of EA’s free-to-play branch Easy Studios, says that the current $60 retail model for games is exploitive. In several interviews to promote the launch of Battlefield Play4Free, Cousins is throwing jabs at the traditional retail model and putting a positive spin on free online games. Of course, it makes sense that Cousins would bag on retail, while pointing out the sunshine and rainbows he feels are associated with the free to play model.

"I can’t think of anything more exploitative than gating all of your content behind having to pay someone $60," Cousins tell Rock, Paper, Shotgun. "That's a really harsh business model if you think about it objectively. What we do is enable everyone to play the game, and figure out if they like it. If they don’t like it they can walk away and they don’t lose anything."

Cousins adds that the future of gaming is "platform agnostic" and that "free games with deep multiplayer experiences" will be at the center of it all.

On a related note, you can check out Battlefield Play4Free by visiting battlefield.play4free.com.


Comments

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

James, the word is "exploitative".  "Exploitive" is not a word.  If you're going to put quotation marks around something, it's probably a good idea to make sure it's the word the person actually used.

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

I can imagine this argument being misused to support the growing tendency of releasing incomplete/buggy games, then charging customers again for 'downloadable content' that should have been part of the full game in the first place. And then tempting them a year later with all of the DLC and the initial game in a 'game of the year' edition if they really want that complete experience.

Initial release price tags are okay and demos for prospective customers to try are pretty common - it's not like you can't wait a few months for the game to drop in price, either. Rarely do I buy a game on release anymore and frequently it saves me about £20 or more per game. If I know the game is likely to be re-released with all DLC later on as well, then I'm prepared to wait even longer and save even more money. Only time I pay that new release price is if I'm absolutely desperate and hyped up about the game, or if there are perks to preordering that warrant the cost.

I want good developers to make money and I'm prepared to give them that money in exchange for their work. It would be nice if they didn't harp on about the used game trade though as that is really your only recourse if you do, indeed, buy a game and not like it, or need to raise some funds to buy the next game they're releasing.

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Remember Shareware? They gave you a full set of levels and if you liked it, you'd buy the full game. In Wolfenstein 3D, they gave you a whole chapter, boss and all. Why can't game companies do that anymore? They can get a profit by selling the shareware (cheap, like $1-3 at the most) or for free if the want, and gamers can find out if the want it or not. And not just PC, but consoles too. Quantity people!

Ah yes I'm that old. :)

-------

GamePolitics, it's time for a mobile version of the site, don't you think?

-------

"WARNING GUARANTEE: This post contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor suppress."

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Becuse new games are about as long as the old demos >>

 

Also they are working on better demos but downloading a 10-20GB game is silly just to get an hour at it....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Though, Zippy, that model works with MMO trials and Casual game trials as they don't know how far you'll get in the demo.  Though, sometimes it doesn't work as I saw HALF of what Plan It Green had to offer before my free hour was done.  Also, with FATE (especially with the Expansequels), you're not giong to see a lot because of HOW the games play, even if you immediately enter the descending tile.  Just saying for what you said about downloading the full but only playing a chunk of it

Replying to your earlier statement about 200 USD for a "Free 2 Play game", I gave an example of a "Pay for the Base set, pay rediculous amount of money if you want the rest". 

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Any way you look at it the game narrative is lite on content which makes demos difficult to do and free to play models even more tricky. I think they would be better off treating a games IP in 2 segments online and offline and charge more for the online unless you are really working on the single player game narrative.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Ya but the 200$ free to play game is even more so..... just say'in...


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

How long has EA been in business? 20, 25 years? Funny how they didn't mind the exploitation for all those years.

But then, this has nothing to do with one-time exploitation, but the desire to exploit many times over a long period of time, shutting out the used market, etc.

The only thing exploitative here is EA's Free2Play Chief himself.

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

To be fair though, neither the Sims (if you stay in one generation of games) or Guitar Hero can be considered the most expensive game out there.  Railworks 2 on steam costs over 1100 if you want every single train and scenario that studio has put out. 

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Railworks is a sim, there are different rules for sims

Also steam only allows the game publisher to publish 'DLC', so what has happened is people wishing to sell their content on steam do it via proxy, so its not all the publishers content (most of it isn't), you are also ignoring the massive amounts of free content that isnt released to steam for it, and the still significantly large paid content that isn't released to steam for it.

I do however hate how it ends up spamming steam, but comparing a sim with lots of content developers to games is not an equal comparison

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Hmm... that muzzle flash is awfully far from the muzzle.  I can see why the game is free. :P

It's interesting that he talks about how this is great for consumers when the model is developed to actually make more money from consumers.  It's just that you make the money over a longer timeframe.

Also, the existence of demos (for some games at least) and extensive previews, reviews, trailers, gameplay videos, etc. kind of belies his point about being able to try before you buy.  In my opionion you can have a reasonable idea of whether or not you'll like a game before you shell out money for it.  And if you think about it, most things you buy come with no such expectation that you should be able to try it out before you decide to pay for it. 

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

its hard to tell but I think that might be an incoming rocket not muzzle flare

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

You're also assuming all games work with all hardware. That's not even true in console space (see: FFXI on PS2, Fable 3 on 360)

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenWhat I find most amazing is the fact that Yiannoppoulos's evidence doesn't in any way support his claim. And I still fail to see the lack of ethics in discussing the ethics surrounding public interest vs. personal privacy.09/19/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOh yeah, some outlets sensationalize things (especially with the chosen headline). No argument there. As far as gender issues not being widespread? I'm inclined to disagree but I suppose it depends on what specifically you're talking about.09/19/2014 - 3:43pm
SleakerI think I've been qualitatively informed by those Factual Femenist videos that there isn't reallly a widespread gender issue, and that there are select news outlets that try to sensationalize things.09/19/2014 - 3:37pm
james_fudgeI'm just going to leave this here before someone else does:http://yiannopoulos.net/2014/09/19/gamejournopros-zoe-quinn-email-dump/09/19/2014 - 3:21pm
NeenekoI have met some real jerks and slimeballs in gender activism, but when I hear the idea that there are many 'not nice' people it comes across as code for 'uppity people who do not know their place'.09/19/2014 - 12:10pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Many of the people pushing gender issues aren't nice people? I'm sure not everyone's a sweatheart but so far, everyone I've seen with such a critique had absolutely nothing to back them up.09/19/2014 - 10:46am
InfophileI think there's a qualitative difference between a site and a hashtag though. GP can ban anyone from commenting, so they can have the image they want. But anyone can use any hashtag and try to poison it. Granted, that hasn't happened to the other one yet09/19/2014 - 10:13am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, your comparison to GP does not work. We do not need to get rid of GP, because no one associates GP with trolls and abuse. The same can't be said for gamergate.09/19/2014 - 10:09am
Krono@Michael You don't remember the "other hashtag" because no one actually uses it. We're talking 836,983 uses of #gamergate over it's lifetime, and 8,119 for the "alternative". 47,129 uses on the 18th vs 41. With #notyourshield at 140,133 uses & 5,209 uses09/19/2014 - 9:48am
Kronoresearch it. Changing tags to get away from trolls would be like wiping GamePolitics and restarting under a new name to get away from people calling Jack Thompson a filthy names in the comments section.09/19/2014 - 9:35am
Sleaker@quiknkold - seems like all that page is is a bunch of random developer opinions and rumors that we're supposedto do what with?09/19/2014 - 9:31am
Kronoas an opportunity to push back against them. It's one of the things muddling the issue. @conster A new hashtag would do nothing to improve anything. Trolls will simply follow to the new hashtag, and it will confuse the issue for anyone attempting to09/19/2014 - 9:25am
Krono@Andrew aaah. Yes, I'm sure there's some of that. Part of the problem is many of the people pushing gender issues are not very nice people. Basically the latest incarnation of moralists we've seen in the past couple decades. Naturually some will take this09/19/2014 - 9:23am
quiknkoldhttp://www.nichegamer.net/2014/09/real-gamedevs-sound-off-regarding-the-gamergate-controversy/09/19/2014 - 8:35am
MaskedPixelanteMeanwhile, in news that actually DOES matter, Scotland voted "NO" to Scottish independance.09/19/2014 - 8:20am
ConsterSeriously? "We shouldn't make a new hashtag - it's better to associate ourselves with psychos than to decrease our visibility"?09/19/2014 - 7:54am
Michael ChandraI forget what it is exactly, but there already is another hashtag that some use, exactly to separate themselves from the abusive behaviour. So don't bother lying to me.09/19/2014 - 7:06am
quiknkold2 to 3 or more09/19/2014 - 6:53am
quiknkoldMichael Chandra : I'll say this. The only reason they havent used another hashtag is because it would look like a form of dividing the arguement. Using another Hashtag has come up, and they feel like if they made a new hashtag, it'll split the debate from09/19/2014 - 6:53am
Michael ChandraYou want a debate? Build a wall between you and the poisoned well. Make clear you despise it, despise the behaviour. Then get into the other issues you are troubled with, and don't say a single word again about the poisoned well.09/19/2014 - 3:46am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician