EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitative'

March 22, 2011 -

Ben Cousins, General Manager of EA’s free-to-play branch Easy Studios, says that the current $60 retail model for games is exploitive. In several interviews to promote the launch of Battlefield Play4Free, Cousins is throwing jabs at the traditional retail model and putting a positive spin on free online games. Of course, it makes sense that Cousins would bag on retail, while pointing out the sunshine and rainbows he feels are associated with the free to play model.

"I can’t think of anything more exploitative than gating all of your content behind having to pay someone $60," Cousins tell Rock, Paper, Shotgun. "That's a really harsh business model if you think about it objectively. What we do is enable everyone to play the game, and figure out if they like it. If they don’t like it they can walk away and they don’t lose anything."

Cousins adds that the future of gaming is "platform agnostic" and that "free games with deep multiplayer experiences" will be at the center of it all.

On a related note, you can check out Battlefield Play4Free by visiting battlefield.play4free.com.


Comments

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

James, the word is "exploitative".  "Exploitive" is not a word.  If you're going to put quotation marks around something, it's probably a good idea to make sure it's the word the person actually used.

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

I can imagine this argument being misused to support the growing tendency of releasing incomplete/buggy games, then charging customers again for 'downloadable content' that should have been part of the full game in the first place. And then tempting them a year later with all of the DLC and the initial game in a 'game of the year' edition if they really want that complete experience.

Initial release price tags are okay and demos for prospective customers to try are pretty common - it's not like you can't wait a few months for the game to drop in price, either. Rarely do I buy a game on release anymore and frequently it saves me about £20 or more per game. If I know the game is likely to be re-released with all DLC later on as well, then I'm prepared to wait even longer and save even more money. Only time I pay that new release price is if I'm absolutely desperate and hyped up about the game, or if there are perks to preordering that warrant the cost.

I want good developers to make money and I'm prepared to give them that money in exchange for their work. It would be nice if they didn't harp on about the used game trade though as that is really your only recourse if you do, indeed, buy a game and not like it, or need to raise some funds to buy the next game they're releasing.

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Remember Shareware? They gave you a full set of levels and if you liked it, you'd buy the full game. In Wolfenstein 3D, they gave you a whole chapter, boss and all. Why can't game companies do that anymore? They can get a profit by selling the shareware (cheap, like $1-3 at the most) or for free if the want, and gamers can find out if the want it or not. And not just PC, but consoles too. Quantity people!

Ah yes I'm that old. :)

-------

GamePolitics, it's time for a mobile version of the site, don't you think?

-------

"WARNING GUARANTEE: This post contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor suppress."

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Becuse new games are about as long as the old demos >>

 

Also they are working on better demos but downloading a 10-20GB game is silly just to get an hour at it....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Though, Zippy, that model works with MMO trials and Casual game trials as they don't know how far you'll get in the demo.  Though, sometimes it doesn't work as I saw HALF of what Plan It Green had to offer before my free hour was done.  Also, with FATE (especially with the Expansequels), you're not giong to see a lot because of HOW the games play, even if you immediately enter the descending tile.  Just saying for what you said about downloading the full but only playing a chunk of it

Replying to your earlier statement about 200 USD for a "Free 2 Play game", I gave an example of a "Pay for the Base set, pay rediculous amount of money if you want the rest". 

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Any way you look at it the game narrative is lite on content which makes demos difficult to do and free to play models even more tricky. I think they would be better off treating a games IP in 2 segments online and offline and charge more for the online unless you are really working on the single player game narrative.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Ya but the 200$ free to play game is even more so..... just say'in...


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

How long has EA been in business? 20, 25 years? Funny how they didn't mind the exploitation for all those years.

But then, this has nothing to do with one-time exploitation, but the desire to exploit many times over a long period of time, shutting out the used market, etc.

The only thing exploitative here is EA's Free2Play Chief himself.

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

To be fair though, neither the Sims (if you stay in one generation of games) or Guitar Hero can be considered the most expensive game out there.  Railworks 2 on steam costs over 1100 if you want every single train and scenario that studio has put out. 

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Railworks is a sim, there are different rules for sims

Also steam only allows the game publisher to publish 'DLC', so what has happened is people wishing to sell their content on steam do it via proxy, so its not all the publishers content (most of it isn't), you are also ignoring the massive amounts of free content that isnt released to steam for it, and the still significantly large paid content that isn't released to steam for it.

I do however hate how it ends up spamming steam, but comparing a sim with lots of content developers to games is not an equal comparison

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

Hmm... that muzzle flash is awfully far from the muzzle.  I can see why the game is free. :P

It's interesting that he talks about how this is great for consumers when the model is developed to actually make more money from consumers.  It's just that you make the money over a longer timeframe.

Also, the existence of demos (for some games at least) and extensive previews, reviews, trailers, gameplay videos, etc. kind of belies his point about being able to try before you buy.  In my opionion you can have a reasonable idea of whether or not you'll like a game before you shell out money for it.  And if you think about it, most things you buy come with no such expectation that you should be able to try it out before you decide to pay for it. 

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

its hard to tell but I think that might be an incoming rocket not muzzle flare

Re: EA Free2Play Chief: $60 Games are 'Exploitive'

You're also assuming all games work with all hardware. That's not even true in console space (see: FFXI on PS2, Fable 3 on 360)

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician