PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

March 29, 2011 -

In new court documents filed by PS3 jailbreaker George Hotz's attorney, Stewart Kellar, asked that the court ignore recent SCEA filings that make claims about Hotz "running to South America," owning a PlayStation Network account, and deliberately removing data from hard drives submitted to a third-party for inspection by the court. Kellar also asked the court to deny SCEA jurisdiction in California.

The bulk of Kellar's argument are found in this PDF file, but the main thrust of it is that SCEA does not own or create the hardware and firmware that it alleges Hotz tampered with - that destinction belongs to Sony Japan. They also call into question the power of the PlayStation Network terms of service, claiming that Hotz never used the service at all. In fact, Kellar claims, Hotz never accepted the PSN TOS and that Sony has no evidence to prove otherwise.

There are many other arguments that Kellar makes in the PDF, but if you are too lazy to read it Groklaw has a great summary of everything going on in the case with these latest filings.

Below is Kellar's "closing argument" to the court:

"For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to sustain these objec-tions and to strike the testimony referred to above. Further, the Court cannot rely on this declaration as it is not made under penalty of per-jury and because it intentionally attempted to hide relevant evidence from the Court by not showing the serial number that SCEA actually found in its database, which does not match the serial number of the Playstation Computer owned by Mr. Hotz."

Source: PSX-Scene

 


Comments

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

You don't have to create an account to accept the TOS.

By simply setting up and using the product you're accepting it. 

Its clear as day.  This shouldn't even be a case.

The guy f'd up, and he should get what he deserves. Personally I'd burn him at the stake. 

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Burn him at the stake? You disgust me.

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Yeah, the guys a hacker accused of enabling piracy. Say you want to throw him if the plank if you're okey with murder.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

so by your logic, if i bought diablo 2 but never set up an account with battle.net (and thus never accepted that specific ToS), im still bound by battle.net's ToS?

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

In a manner of speaking, yes. But since you're not playing on battle.net, there's no way to break the ToS. Not literally speaking, it's all technical bullcrap. but yeah, the ToS are still there.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Funny claiming he never accepted the TOS considering you have to accept the TOS to make an account. 

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

claiming he never made an account.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

It's a fairly decent argument. This is a civil case and Hotz was under no court order or other obligation to stay in the United States, as long as he maintains communication with his attorney and didn't take anything with him he was specifically ordered to turn over to Sony or the court then yelling about him leaving is completely frivolous.

This case is going to be a nightmare of Electronic Discovery. Judges are notoriously horrible with computer based evidence, they don't understand the tranisitional and necessarily temporary nature of much of the data on a computer.

Should be interesting to see how this proceeds. 

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Sony, how's that ironclad case working for ya?  About as well as that CD protection system a few years ago, I say.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

The one they spent millions developing but was foiled by scribbling on the edge with and eighty nine cent marker?

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Actually, yes, this is the one I was talking about.  I LOVE throwing it in their face.  BWHAHAHAHAHA!

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Me too 8) They spend millions developing it, and someone breaks it for far less than they paid for it, making it worthless.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

I think he is referring to their root kit fiasco. In which SONY BMG cds installed malware on your computer that disabled many cd rom drives and prevented many 3rd party music players from even playing the cds.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Ah, ok, so basically they ruined your 500 dollar computer to protect their 12 dollar CD

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Yeah, pretty much.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sleaker@Conster - sand?09/19/2014 - 11:40pm
Krono@Andrew That page of the comments seems to be a bit messed up. It's the one by Titanium Dragon, posted at 2:22 pm.09/19/2014 - 11:37pm
E. Zachary KnightI myself had a Twitter exchange with a gamergate person that frankly soured me on a personal level to the group. I want absolutely nothing to do with it.09/19/2014 - 11:35pm
E. Zachary KnightAnd frankly, that is the kind of tyrade that has a lot of us not wanting anything to do with the gamergate crowd. They take any comment, no matter how innocuous, and blow it out of proportion.09/19/2014 - 11:34pm
E. Zachary KnightI assume you are referring to the comment in response to the web developer, in which the person goes off on a tyrade about "colluding against clients." That guy totally misread the web developers statements.09/19/2014 - 11:33pm
Andrew EisenAre you sure you linked the right comment?09/19/2014 - 11:31pm
KronoBeyond that, I would recommend this Ars Technica comment as a good highlight of the ethical problems people are seeing http://goo.gl/qq8fes09/19/2014 - 11:27pm
Andrew EisenAnd he didn't go through with it because he realized it was a bad idea so there was no breach of ethics in that case.09/19/2014 - 11:26pm
Krono@Andrew To respond to your early remark about where the lack of ethics was, part of it was what Kyle Orland suggested in his article. Crossing the line from reporter to advocate. Journalists aren't supposed to support a side the way they discussed.09/19/2014 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenOkay, I'm drawing the line here. The Shout box is not for discussing other people's private lives.09/19/2014 - 10:54pm
Neo_DrKefkaI wish there was an, "I don't care." for the whole Minecraft poll thing09/19/2014 - 9:27pm
TechnogeekMy third "dart" wound up hitting a Chinese website for soccer scores, and the fourth hit Pokemon.com. Not one of those had anything to do with white guys getting harassed because they're white guys.09/19/2014 - 8:56pm
TechnogeekFor the record, I actually tried "throwing a dart at the Internet", or at least approximating it as best I could by zooming in at random spots on internet-map.net. First hit was a perfume seller, and then some sort of insurance spammer.09/19/2014 - 8:56pm
Technogeek"While you could throw a dart at the internet and find a site where Gamers in General are being harassed, doxxed, hacked, just because they are being perceived as white males." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FopyRHHlt3M09/19/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenSarkeesian and Quinn continue to get harassed and attacked (with the majority of said harassment and attacks being about their gender) and so, the story stays in the headlines. If Wolfe gets swatted again, it will be in the news again.09/19/2014 - 6:56pm
Andrew EisenYou mean Wesley Wolfe? The swatting appeared to be over his DMCA takedown, not due to his color or gender.09/19/2014 - 6:53pm
ConsterSo Sleaker, what's the sand like?09/19/2014 - 6:53pm
quiknkold@CraigR. Spreading Misandry is not going to kill Misogyny. Its just going to fuel it. half the people supporting that arguement are mysoginists themselves. They just dont know it.09/19/2014 - 6:51pm
Sleaker@CraigR - there's nothing to get over. There's no issue here until someone does an actual study on harassment rates.09/19/2014 - 6:48pm
quiknkoldWe never said Gamers were the only victims. Yes, Anita and Zoe got a bad rap. Yes, Zoe's ex was way out of line. Do I disagree with them? Depends on the arguement. Did they deserve what happened to them? Hell Effing No.09/19/2014 - 6:48pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician