Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

April 5, 2011 -

A new study from Simmons College researchers comes to the conclusion that children exposed to more violent games for longer periods of time are less able to sympathize with others. The new study published in the Journal of Children and Media surveyed 166 Boston, MA and southern New Hampshire schoolchildren. The study was overseen by Simmons College professors Edward T. Vieira and Marina Krcmar. They examined the relationship between violent games and kids' attitudes toward violence.

The duo surveyed children age 7-15 about their favorite games, how many hours a week they played, and questions to gauge their ability to sympathize with others, to see things from another person's perspective, and whether they saw violence as an appropriate response in situations where it would be deemed justified or unjustified. The favorite "violent games" included Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto, Counter Strike, Mortal Kombat: Deception, and World of Warcraft.

"To make a judgment about violence, at least two skills are necessary," the paper read. "First, a child must be able to imagine the point-of-view of both parties in the aggressive conflict. Second, he/she should be able to feel some sympathy or imagine some sympathy towards each party. Only at this point can a moral judgment be appropriately made."

The researchers found that children with more exposure to violent games were less able to sympathize with others and that violent game players tended to have different perceptions on whether justified violent acts were permissible. The same group that had trouble being sympathetic also were more likely to accept unjustified violence, researchers said.

"Those who play more violent video games perceive violence in the name of retaliation and self-protection as more justified, much like the view of violence presented in video games," the paper continued.

Obviously there are limitations to this study including small sample size, and the fact that it is simply a survey. We're also not sure how the questions were phrased, and if participants were given a list of games to choose from or made their own choices. Below is what one of the study's researchers told GameSpot:

"Exposure to violent video games is directly associated with justified violence," Edward T. Vieira told GameSpot. "Therefore, there are cases where violence is justified such as self-defense or defending loved ones. One might have a 'normal' ability to empathize, for example, and see some types of violence as acceptable. We could apply this to societal issues such as capital punishment and wars."

"On the other hand, the study suggests that children who are heavy violent gamers are associated with less perspective-taking (empathy ability) and less perspective-taking predicts gratuitous violence (unjustified) as acceptable. This appears to make sense, because it suggests that there is no 'reason' for the violence; it is done for its own sake or some emotional motive. It intimates that the unjustified condition requires other factors such as perspective-taking. Therefore, the unjustified condition does involve gaming exposure, but gaming exposure mediated by the cognitive ability to perspective-take."

Source: GameSpot

Comments

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

People consider my very caring and i've been palying violet games since Mortal Kombat 2.

Irks me that they tak data from such a small group and apply it to all.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

That is an interesting study but waaay too limited in scope to draw any conclusions from. Personaly, and I know anectodal evidence means nothing scientifically, I grew up with videogames from a young age, many of them violent. I would consider myself to be very sympathetic and caring in regards to other people, even those that are often demonized by our culture, like Muslims today and illegal immigrants.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

New observational study shows researchers who do studies on violent video games tend to be biased, unprofessional, incompetent in their assumptions, unable to do thorough research, are incapable of analyzing their participants as complex individuals, and tend to lie, deceive, even distort the truth for their own agendas.

And comparing the repetitive "studies" done by researchers as the above, observational research is far more accurate than the methods THEY use.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

isn't that a common factor in almost any study, especially the ones sponsored by one group or another?

the thing is, most people tend to be simple minded enough to just take whatever their told, as long as the aforementioned group gets the "results" they wanted, they can further convince people that their cause is correct, and many won't question this logically.

thus we find the major issue in releasing these half baked studies in the first place, and not contending them, or at least running some sort of damage cleanup.

Fox news is the prime example of BS gone awry, and people still swear by them.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

I stopped caring about other people once I turned libertarian

what now, punk?

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

I'd flip this one around. If they want to imply causality - how about - the children are less sympathetic to others therefore they play "violent " games...

As an aside, I agree even the statement that there is correlation is weak at best.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

No examples of what they consider "unjustified" violence, I mean what scenarios did they question these kids about?  Also, to what extent was the form of acceptable violence?  Were the kids talking about punching someone, or shooting them in the face?  If we're talking about someone i school sytematically harassing you, there's a big difference from sucker punching him, and bringing a gun to class.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

World of Warcraft. Violent game. Right.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

Might just be that kids who don't like that kinda violence don't play the games. Where's the evidence that the games caused it?

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

 Exactly. The people behind this study are not taking into account the pre-existing personalities of the kids in these studies and thus bascially claiming that violent video games are the CAUSE of their feelings. Fact of the matter is though, gamers like to play games that MATCH their pre-existing interests. If they like Sports they will likely play sports games, If they like cars they will likely play racing games, if they have little problem with violence or like violence then they will play violence, and if they were raised to hate violence then they probably won't be playing those games.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

Exactly my thoughts. There's no causality here, only correlation (if even that).

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

I'd want to know if they controlled for other important variables. Bivariate correlations don't mean much and are often inflated.  Unfortunately I don't have access to this particular article...

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

Nonsense. If correlation wouldn't equal causation we surely would have heard of it by now.

Re: Study: Violent Game Players Less Sympathetic to Others

That's a pretty broad range of "violent games" (as I've said many times before): FPSes, Sandbox, Fighter, and even a MMORPG, ranging from Teen to Mature. And all these make kids less sympathetic to others than...who? Kids who were exposed to less violent games? Non-violent games? Or no games at all? There doesn't seem to be a lot of research into counter-study (and rarely ever is).

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://i5.minus.com/iN5o9iu1ON2NG.jpg "It cursed my gear? WHY WOULD IT DO THAT?! THIS GAME IS BUGGED!"04/24/2014 - 9:51pm
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician