ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New Technology

April 18, 2011 -

Starting today, North American video game ratings system ESRB revealed that it will start using a computer-based program to determine ratings on some games. According to a New York Times report, the ESRB has developed a computer program designed to take developer input to create a rating for their games. This will be used first with downloadable games on platforms such as Xbox Live Arcade, PlayStation Network, and WiiWare titles.

Game developers will fill out an online questionnaire to find out what "violence, sexuality, profanity, drug use, gambling and bodily function" that might be considered questionable by players. The submissions would then be reviewed by the new ESRB software and a rating would be issued. A submitted game won't be reviewed by an actual human until after release.

As C&VG points out, this system is similar to one used by PEGI, the European ratings system. Much like the ESRB's new system, developers submit what is called a "content declaration." The difference is, instead of using a computer program, the submission is reviewed by a human being.

No doubt this is a way for the ESRB to tackle the steady influx of social and mobile games, though a deal with Apple and Facebook to rate games has not happened yet. While some might be concerned about a "Hot Coffee" incident occurring, it should be noted that a stiff penalty awaits anyone who does not disclose content like that to the ESRB in advance.

But even with a stiff penalty in place, if something slips through the cracks and is controversial enough it could make the entire industry look bad.

We will have to see how the system works in the months ahead..

Source: C&VG


Comments

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

Can't waity for certain people to find out about this.

"Now porn games can be submitted without a human being ever being involved."

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

I was thinking the same. Anti-games crowd will love to use this as a new scapegoat about why the ESRB is void for rating games.

I hope this automatic system actually works.

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

Indeed. If it's automated some will likely assume any game will pass if they enter things just right.

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

Of course they will automatically pass. If you create "Blood, Guts and Sex: XXX Now with more Boobs" and say it contains no violence, no sex and no swearing, of course you are going to get an E rating. But you also run the risk of getting huge fines fro mteh ESRB, if they don't flag it before release. So why would you do it?

There are no major game developers or publishers who are willing to not only amass huge fines as well as  damage the credibility of the ESRB and the games industry for the sake of getting a lower rating through this. If someone is dumb enough to do it, they deserve all the fallout they get.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

I agree with you, I was just saying what some of those who are less technogically inclined might say about it.

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

It's already proven that the ESRB is more effective than the rating systems for any other entertainment medium out there. As a retailer, I'm constantly handing out the ESRB pamphlets, if for no other reason that parents won't have a reason to bitch at me because their kid lied and said "It's not THAT bad!" or "I've played this before!".

Honestly, you'd be surprised and disturbed by what works when a kid is trying to get their parents to buy them Grand Theft Auto. It's doubly frustrating when said parents don't speak a lick of English.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

Oh trust me, I know. I've read plenty of stories where a clerk handed out such information as a kid gave them a dirty look.

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

So in other words no real change has occurred. The ESRB has always relied on the answers to the questionnaire for rating only going back if it is a high profile title. Only now instead of a person adding up the questionnaire it is a program.

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

Currently the ESRB has applicants (game studios) provide a video showing the most extreme content and the human reviewers will fill out the questionaire.

This new process is closer to the PEGI way of doing things.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

The publisher fills out the questionnaire in both ESRB submission processes, actually.

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

And the human reviewers review the video and supplied questionaire for accuracy.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

I take it this means that this means any context of the content will be irrelevant- unless this is some kind of super computer algorithm (which I seriously doubt).

I have a bad feeling about this...

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

What does context have to do with anything?

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

I think this is a positive step forward .The human component has always been the bottle neck for rating games. With the huge influx of digitally distributed games, they were probably getting overwhelmed.

As for potential controversy, I don't see it being any more of a deal than it currently is. We have had only a single "hot coffee" incident. I don't see any game company willing to go through that. Not that the current process is capable of preventing a future "hot coffee"

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: ESRB Automates Ratings System Pipeline with New ...

Actually, we've had two "hot coffees." Don't forget Oblivion. Although, that didn't create half the controversy that GTA did. Still, I think you're right about scandles creating any more trouble in the industry than we're in already. I think we can handle it.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Infophile@Matt: I'm talking about people I've seen on this site arguing that the title alone justified the reaction to the article, that it was deliberately offensive. Not even a new YouTube video by a risen-from-the-dead Albert Einstein would change that.07/31/2015 - 12:52pm
Big PermI just didn't care for the wording. I don't think it should be changed or anything.07/31/2015 - 12:46pm
james_fudgeIf I am misunderstanding your point expand on it in the comments and i'll talk about it in there.07/31/2015 - 12:23pm
james_fudgeIt's clearly part of a broader internal fight against people like Sargon.07/31/2015 - 12:21pm
james_fudgeBig perm: fair point. On the other hand that's its origins and not saying that in some way would be a disservice to our readers07/31/2015 - 12:21pm
Andrew EisenMatt - What is the argument that Sargon supposedly debunked?07/31/2015 - 12:06pm
Big PermThat said, I don't think it's a shit article.07/31/2015 - 11:22am
Big PermNot really a fan of "one individual aligned with Gamer Gate attempted to shame a prominent figure within its own ranks". It should be encouraged that we call out hipocracy, and instead I feel that shines a negative light on such a thing.07/31/2015 - 11:21am
james_fudgeI'm curious what our GG-aligned readers think of our Necromancer story? Was it fair? Unfair?07/31/2015 - 11:11am
E. Zachary KnightMatt, That the whole stink over the articles is a bunch of BS? Because that is the only part that is BS.07/31/2015 - 8:29am
MattsworknameOh btw, info, are you still refering to that "gamers are dead" argument? Cause sargon of akkad just did a 3 video series that proves it's based on bullshit07/31/2015 - 6:46am
MattsworknameInfo: thats what you call clickbaiting to the highest level07/31/2015 - 5:43am
InfophileAnd here's why you never judge an article by its title: "Microsoft Gives All Windows 10 Users the Finger" - http://www.themarysue.com/microsoft-windows-10-middle-finger/ (I'm looking at you, people still mad about "Gamers are Dead")07/31/2015 - 5:09am
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-07-31/khan-academy-s-sal-khan-studio-1-0-full-show-7-30- not game related, but this is a good interview.07/30/2015 - 8:52pm
Goth_SkunkFinally, I never misspelled Chipman's name. So, feel free to try your luck again, but pick an opponent you can beat.07/30/2015 - 8:32pm
Goth_Skunk@Technogeek: I paid for the experience of the seat, and upon completion of the movie determined that the extra for the seat wasn't worth it. Additionally, your opinion is not law. You thinking the movie is crap does not make it so.07/30/2015 - 8:31pm
Craig R.1st I heard of Pixels was seeing trailer in theater. Was interested until Sandler appeared, then it became an instant 'Nope'.07/30/2015 - 4:52pm
james_fudgesick burns are not always allowed in the shoutbox.07/30/2015 - 4:28pm
MechaCrashIt's especially funny because I said "you'd have to be a moron to enjoy it," and Goth boasted about enjoying it, as if that does anything to change my opinion of the movie or of him.07/30/2015 - 4:19pm
TechnogeekMatthew: Back when that law was first implemented, I kept trying to come up with a scenario where it would be anything other than an unmitigatedd sisaster. Nothing ever came to mind.07/30/2015 - 4:16pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician