FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to Video Game Retailers

April 20, 2011 -

The latest Federal Trade Commission undercover shopper survey found that video game retailers continue to enforce the sale of "M-Rated" games to minors better than any other industry. Overall, sales of R-rated movie tickets, R-rated movie DVDs, unrated DVDs, music CDs carrying a Parental Advisory Label (PAL) that warns of explicit content, and video games rated "M" to minors were on the decline.

"Our undercover shopper survey demonstrates some progress," said David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. "But more needs to be done."

The FTC recruited 13- to 16-year-olds, unaccompanied by a parent, to attempt to buy media content that was not appropriate for their age groups. The undercover secret shopper program ran from November 2010 to January 2011. Teenagers attempted to buy these products from national and regional chain stores and theaters across the United States.

The survey found that music CD retailers lagged far behind movie theaters, as well as movie DVD and video game retailers, in preventing unaccompanied children under the age of 17 from purchasing mature content. Nearly two-thirds of teen shoppers (64 percent) were able to purchase CDs with a PAL label, down from 72 percent in 2009. There was no statistical change in ratings enforcement at the movie box office. One-third of underage shoppers bought a ticket to an R-rated movie, up slightly from 28 percent in 2009.

Retailers of R-rated and unrated DVDs showed improvement in ratings enforcement. Thirty-eight percent of shoppers purchased R-rated DVDs, compared to 54 percent in 2009. Forty-seven percent purchased unrated DVDs, down from 58 percent in 2009.

Video game retailers continued to improve enforcement and were the most effective in turning teen shoppers away who were seeking "M" rated video games. Only 13 percent of teens were able to buy an "M" rated game, compared to 20 percent last time the FTC conducted a secret shopper survey.

Focusing on video games for a moment, the worst retailer in the bunch was Walmart and the best was Target. Walmart had a 20 percent failure rate, followed by Best Buy with 16 percent, Toys R Us and Kmart tied at 10 percent, GameStop at 9 percent and Target at 8 percent.

These findings are certainly bad news for anti-game groups who would like the public to believe that teens have easy access to "Mature" rated content without adult intervention.

Posted in

Comments

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

"These findings are certainly bad news for anti-game groups who would like the public to believe that teens have easy access to "Mature" rated content without adult intervention."

You wish.  We all know full well that they will give that 13% figure with absolutely no context, and play it up as if it is huge.  That is, if they even bother using real research and statistics for once.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

The rate of minors getting M-rated games(13%) fell by almost half(down 35%) compared to the last FTC report(20%).

Survey says: One more for the good guys.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

I'm kind of blown away that best buy was worst after walmart, every time I went in there when I was in high school they asked for ID.

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

I'm betting the EMA case had a lot to do with retailers putting out the strongest numbers yet. They want to ensure that voluntary restrictions work to convince the Court that legislation is not necessary.

Of course, I've said it before, let's see how well the retailers do if the Court rules the law unconstitutional and says that violence cannot be restricted.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

Hm.  You think these numbers will affect the ruling?  I'd say it's a little late for that -- though fortunately the numbers last time out were pretty good too.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

I'm more inclined to believe the ruling will affect the numbers. If the court says that restricting sales through legislation is unconstitutional, retailers will not have the incentive to enforce the ratings anymore, since they made that commitment to stave off attempts at regulation.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

Then that's a fool move at it still won't be the last attempt at regulation.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

What I want to know is the age breakdown.  How does the age of the shopper correlate with the refusal of the sale?

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

Seconded.  I'm sure more 16-year-olds got M-rated games than 13-year-olds, but I'd like to see the numbers.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

Here is the link to their summary and press release:

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/04/violentkidsent.shtm

One thing to note is that Gamestop actually got wors this time around. The 2009 report showed kids being able to buy M rated games 5% of the time at Gamestop and 9% of the time in 2010. I wonder if the FTC sent more 16 year olds there this year.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

Until video games reach 5% or less, anti-game groups will still complain that it's corrupting the "children", even though M rated sale have had a steady decline in sale to minors. And I honestly believe that the anti-game groups will just use the year old data to say 1 in 5 M rated game make it into the hands of minors.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

more like 0%... until then, they will continue to insist video games need to be legally enforced, despite the fact that legal enforcement would not lower those percentages much more if at all. Though even that won't shut up the most zealous anti-game mouth pieces

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

You really think they'd be quiet even if it were at 0%?

The only thing that's going to get them to stop going after games is a newer medium to be afraid of.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

That, and they keep ignoring that other rating systems do NOT carry the force of law.

Re: FTC Undercover Shopper Survey Gives Highest Marks to ...

BOOYAH!  Suck on it, all other forms of media!

...Err, I mean, another splendid display of tact and restraint on the part of gaming retailers, yes yes.

*cough*

---
Fangamer

---
Fangamer
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician