Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

May 5, 2011 -

As hard as it is to believe, hackers may actually suffer from Sony's massive security breach that has seen 102 million users worldwide compromised. According to a New York Times Bits blog report, the massive amount of credit card numbers being flooded into the lucrative black market could bring the price of illegal credit card sales down dramatically.

According to the NYT, hackers who resell personal info and credit cards do not look kindly on what will happen if those responsible for Sony's security breach decide to sell all of it on the black market. Typically stolen credit card numbers sell for around $5 - $10 each (according to an anonymous source familiar with the black market). If millions of new card numbers flood the market, it could bring the value down to a paltry $1 - $2 each.

"We’re keeping a close eye on the Sony story as it would drastically affect the resale of other cards," an experienced hacker based in Europe who declined to share his name due to the nature of his work told the NYT.

Kevin Stevens, a senior threat researcher at Trend Micro, said in an interview last week that there is a lot of discussion in hacker forums about the Sony data breach. Several "credit card dealers" expressed concern that the influx of millions of credit cards would flood the market and lower prices, he said.

I would like to say that I feel bad for these people, but I don't. It should also be noted that buying this data right now would be like buying the Mona Lisa a day after it was stolen. In other words: many eyes are watching all over the world.

Source: NYT by way of Kotaku


Comments

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

Hackers are just regular criminals. We tend to think of them differently just because they're smart! But just because they CAN do something we can't doesn't mean they SHOULD. I don't feel sorry for them!

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

...Are we supposed to be feeling sorry for hackers now? 

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

I sure as hell don't. They act big and tough across the net, but let them see that there are consequences.

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

Thank gosh I only used re-loadable cards at SoE. And well, just about anywhere.

I have no debit card attached to my bank account, lets me sleep easier at night.

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

Same here, or I just bought PSN cards.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

This is what I did, and I'm glad I did it, and after this disastor, I will keep doing it.


Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

I wonder how someone who sells millions of dollars worth of stolen credit cards explains how they're suddenly a millionare. Do they just say they won the lottery?

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

Money laundering, keeping it in cash, if they're smart they invest it in little increments to make it appear that they're using their own money to invest and such.

Not that I think that's gonna help them, mind. This has made a huge enough deal that I think whoever is behind this is going to be be dogged hard by law enforcement.

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

Not to mention pissed off users turning over any information they find.

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

If they're smart, I imagine they move to a tropical country with no extridition treaties to speak of before anyone notices.  Removes that need to explain anything.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

Hehe, if it completely ruined that market I'd call it a win. Not to mention with who Sony is working with a crackdown could be coming.

Re: Sony Security Problems Could Hurt Hackers Too

Well, this article certainly wasn't what I thought it was going to be.

My first thought at this article's title? It's going to turn up the brightness of the spotlight that is on hackers, in that there's going to be more pressure to go after hackers of all kinds who break into systems illegally.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will we ever get Half-Life 3?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary Knightquiknkold, I can't speak for James, but trying to silence a critic by blocking its financial supporters is a censorious activity. It may not be the same as direct censoring, but its ends are the same.10/02/2014 - 8:18am
E. Zachary KnightMecha, I found neither the title nor the content of Gamasutra's Gamers are Dead article inflammatory. But I guess that just means I was the target audience for it.10/02/2014 - 8:16am
prh99@james_fudge Agreed, but then again this group doesn't exactly have high ethical standards or even a grasp of hypocrisy.10/02/2014 - 8:14am
MechaTama31Are... Are you guys suggesting that the content of the "Gamers are over" article is *less* inflammatory than the title?10/02/2014 - 7:58am
quiknkoldhey James, Boycotts are not Censorship. Supreme Court NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982)10/02/2014 - 7:37am
Michael ChandraWhat's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. That said, the name says it all.10/02/2014 - 7:34am
E. Zachary KnightYes.10/02/2014 - 7:29am
ConsterQuestion: is Kefka on drugs, or is he secretly a conspiracy theorist character from a TV show?10/02/2014 - 7:21am
james_fudgeEnjoy my comedy stylings.10/02/2014 - 7:10am
james_fudgehttp://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/10/02/It-s-been-real-GameJournoPros-prepares-to-close-its-doors10/02/2014 - 7:09am
InfophileAnd the headlines-only part is particularly depressing, as in most sites, they're not even written by the author of the article. So the author has to field tons of complaints about what the editor decided to title their article.10/02/2014 - 6:25am
InfophileAE: Most people don't. This has been tested - I remember an article slipped in a request in the second-to-last paragraph to use the word "banana" in your comment if you read that. It took over 50 posts for a banana.10/02/2014 - 6:24am
james_fudgeprh99: Whether you agree with the article or not, fighting alleged censorship with censorship is hella lame10/02/2014 - 4:27am
james_fudgewhoever made that decision at Intel will regret it later on down the road. Boycotts are tricky business.10/02/2014 - 4:26am
prh99The unflattering characterization "They don’t know how to dress or behave." & "‘Games culture’ is a petri dish of people who know so little about how human social interaction..." probably didn't help.10/02/2014 - 1:52am
prh99Probably not many as it was purely a vindictive move. The headline alone was plenty of ammo, but for those that did read and complain..10/02/2014 - 1:42am
Andrew EisenI wonder how many of those who complain about that article actually read past the headline.10/02/2014 - 1:37am
prh99http://intel.ly/1tjh1AH http://bit.ly/1rGPHOY http://intel.ly/Zu6go9 it isn't surprising "Gamers are over" didn't go over very well.10/02/2014 - 1:34am
Papa MidnightCan you parlay that to #WriteAGawkerArticle? The cesspool of horrid crap over there extends far beyond Kotaku.10/02/2014 - 12:34am
Andrew EisenWow! Intel dropped Gamasutra due to GameJournoPros? Over Matt Matthews? The only Gamasutra guy in the group? Who hasn't written a single thing about #GamerGate at the site? Where did you read that?10/02/2014 - 12:32am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician