WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

May 10, 2011 -

During its post-earnings call this week, Activision blizzard revealed that World of Warcraft subscriptions are down by about five percent. In October 2010, the popular MMORPG had around 12 million subscribers. Now the game enjoys about 11.4 million subscribers. To deal with the drop off, Blizzard's president Michael Morhaime said that the company has to release future expansion packs in a more timely fashion to contain player drop-off.

"As our players have become more experienced playing World of Warcraft over many years, they have become much better and much faster at consuming content," said Blizzard president Michael Morhaime during a conference call. "And so I think with Cataclysm they were able to consume the content faster than with previous expansions, but that's why we're working on developing more content."

"We need to be faster at delivering content to players," he added. "And so that's one of the reasons that we're looking to decrease the amount of time in-between expansions."

"What we have seen so far is that people have been consuming this content very quickly, and so the subscriber levels have decreased faster than in previous expansions," he concluded.

Source: Blue's News, Gamasutra


Comments

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

The game needed a face lift problem was the end game content really sucked and it was just too hard.

Ghostwalker wanted to go away from Wraith of the Lich King and that it was too easy though most people liked it now people are leaving or finding another game to play well this is a cause and effect moment. Basically you have an elitist staff member who wants to impose his views on a game. Thats like making a Forum Nazi in control of a game development.

Go back to the way Wraith was done and people will come back, right now I see no point in playing WoW as is.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

I suspect we'll see some more drops in subscriptions when Guild Wars 2 and Star Wars: The Old Republic release.  They both look excellent, and they appeal to a crowd that isn't obsessed with raiding grinds.  There are a lot of more casual players in WoW that only stay there because there are no really viable A-list titles to migrate to.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

I don't doubt it, although I doubt either will oust WoW from the #1 spot just yet. There's definitely room in the market for major competition though.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Is new content no longer included in the subscription fee? It sounds like they add new content only through expansions :(

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Content is still released regularly in between expansions. I think Morhaime was trying to say that 2 years between expansions was too slow for the market, which they've been saying since the first expansion.

I don't think they've ever been anywhere near 20 million active. 12 is closer to the mark. They've been fairly stable over the last few years, with fluctuation to the tune of +/- 5% being pretty normal. We're just hearing more detail now as Activision stockholders are learning how significantly tied to WoW's success their investment is.

 A note: they're speaking only of active subscribers. Thats accounts that are currently paid for (by the month in North America or hourly services in Asia that have been active within the last 30 days). These numbers do not include dormant accounts, unused game cards, or free trials.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

With optional microtransactions, free-to-play, buy-once-to-play and various combinations of these business models now gaining rapid popularity amongst the online gaming market, I can only imagine the pressure is really on Blizzard to make sure that monthly fee is value for money for its customers.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Given the number of big-name titles coming out since the past couple months and within the next few (Duke Nukem Forever included), I'm not surprised to hear this. Probably many gamers whom are suspending their subscription to play something else for a while.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Call me crazy, but a dropoff from 20 million to 11.4 million strikes me as a tad more than 5%.  Through some totally complicated mathematical wizardry (11.4 divided by 20, subtract result from 1), I'm pegging it at 43%.  So which number is the wrong one?  Was it a 43% drop from 20 to 11.4?  Was it a 5% drop from 12 to 11.4 (this would be my guess)?  Or 5% from 20 to 19?  Enquiring minds want to know.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Looks like the 20 was just a typo and the real number is 12.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

This is the first place I've ever heard of WOW having anywhere near 20 million subscribers. I remember about a year or 18 months ago hearing they had somewhere around 11 so I seriously doubt they doubled their subscriptions since then. I would guess that should be 12 down to 11.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician