Dead or Alive: Dimensions Gets 'PG' Rating in Australia

May 31, 2011 -

Australia is an interesting country. On the one hand it has struggled for years to get an adult level video games rating classification (R18+) and on the other it allows a game that has been censored in other countries to be released there with little or no controversy. The game in question is the 3DS tactical fighter Dead or Alive: Dimensions. Several countries have banned the game because it features sexualized depictions of children. The children are three teen characters named Ayane, Koroke and Kasumi who game makers describe as "under 18 years of age."

To be fair, the censoring has been done mostly by Nintendo, based on concerns about child pornography laws in Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark and Norway) that say it is illegal to show young girls as animated characters in a sexualized way. The concern is mostly with the game's photography mode, which allows players to look up characters' dresses when they are in certain poses.

Controversy about the game in other parts of the world has not affected the game's rating in Australia: the country's rating Classification Board has given the game a rating of "PG."

So - for a change - Australians get a game that is not available in other parts of Europe - for whatever that's worth.

Source: Digital Life


Comments

Re: Dead or Alive: Dimensions Gets 'PG' Rating in Australia

"and on the other it allows a game that has been censored in other countries to be released there with little or no controversy..."

Shhhhhh... don´t give them ideas.

Re: Dead or Alive: Dimensions Gets 'PG' Rating in Australia

This is esp odd since this is the same country that bars small breasted women from appearing in pornography under the theory that they are too child-like and thus promoting pedophilia.....

Re: Dead or Alive: Dimensions Gets 'PG' Rating in Australia

Which is stupid in my opinion. I don't know who they think are protecting with laws like that. Video game character are usually dressed in cute or sexy outfits. Just because some of the characters in a fighting game are supposed to be in the mid-teens they are going to label it child porn? Makes no sense at all.


Re: Dead or Alive: Dimensions Gets 'PG' Rating in Australia

"a game that has been censored"

I didn't hear anything about a censored version.

 

"Several countries have banned the game"

Which would be? Maybe those backward arabic emirates?

 

"the censoring has been done mostly by Nintendo"

"Voluntarily decided not to release the game" would be a better way to say it. At least I wouldn't really count it as censored.

 

"based on concerns about child pornography laws in Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark and Norway)"

Only sweden. The others are collateral damage.

Re: Dead or Alive: Dimensions Gets 'PG' Rating in Australia

"Voluntarily decided not to release the game" would be a better way to say it. At least I wouldn't really count it as censored.

That is censoring. Self censoring is still censoring. If you fear repercussions from a law and decide to not speak, you are still being censored by said law.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: Dead or Alive: Dimensions Gets 'PG' Rating in Australia

Boom, roasted.

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenWell this is unique! A musical critique of the Factual Feminist's "Are Video Games Sexist?" video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4s7cV4Us409/20/2014 - 2:41am
Andrew EisenSome locked threads. Some let them be. So, no, I'm not seeing a problem here. No corruption. No collusion. No ethical problem with privately discussing ethics.09/20/2014 - 12:48am
Andrew EisenAnd still, in the end, Tito made up his own mind on how to handle his site. All 150 or so members went off to handle their own sites in their own ways. Some talked about it. Some didn't. Some changed disclosure policies. Some didn't.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenThere were two comments other than Kochera and Tito's. One pointed out the Escapist Code of Conduct, another comment was in support of Tito.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenKochera privately expressed his disagreement on how Tito decided to do something. No, I don't consider that crossing a line nor do I consider the exchange an example of the group pressuring him.09/20/2014 - 12:36am
Kronotechnical reasons. Anyways, I need to get to sleep as well.09/20/2014 - 12:29am
KronoAnd he wasn't the only one pushing Tito to censor the thread. If Tito had bowed to peer pressure, we likely wouldn't have gotten this http://goo.gl/vKiYtR which grew out of that thread. Said thread also lasted until a new one needed to be made for09/20/2014 - 12:28am
Krono@Andrew So it's an example of Kuchera crossing the line from reporter to advocate. And an example of the group pressuring for censorship.09/20/2014 - 12:21am
E. Zachary KnightAnyway, I am off to bed. I will probably wake up to all of this being knocked off the shout box.09/20/2014 - 12:20am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, that is the type of reading too much into things that bugs me. Ben did no such thing. Greg had the last word in that part of the exchange. The rest was about how to approach the story and Quinn.09/20/2014 - 12:19am
Andrew EisenSo?09/20/2014 - 12:13am
KronoExcept that the forum thread wasn't harassment, and Kuchera continued to push for the thread's removal after Tito made it clear he didn't consider it harassment.09/20/2014 - 12:12am
Andrew EisenPersonally, I see nothing wrong with someone offering their opinion or the other person making up their own mind on how to run their site.09/20/2014 - 12:06am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, I read nothing of the sort in that email chain. I read Ben giving advice on what to do when a forum thread is used to harass someone and spread falshoods about them and others.09/20/2014 - 12:05am
KronoThat's exactly what Ben Kuchera was doing to Greg Tito.09/19/2014 - 11:58pm
Krono@EZK So you see nothing wrong with one journalist pressuring a journalist from a different organization to not only not run a story, but to censor a civil discussion already taking place?09/19/2014 - 11:56pm
E. Zachary KnightI write for a number of blogs and talk to people who write similar blogs all the time for tips and advice. I see nothing wrong with that.09/19/2014 - 11:50pm
E. Zachary KnightI read that comment now and frankly, I think that guy is reading too much into this. The press talk to each other. It happens. There is nothing that can be done to stop it from happening.09/19/2014 - 11:49pm
KronoUnfortunately it seems unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.09/19/2014 - 11:45pm
Krono@EZK No that's not the comment. As for wanting nothing do with any of it, that's perfectly understandable.09/19/2014 - 11:44pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician