Tapjoy Complains About Apple's Ban on 'Pay-Per-Install'

June 1, 2011 -

Middleware company Tapjoy has complained publicly that Apple's ban of "pay per install" apps and promotions has adversely affected its business and a majority of iOS developers who want to use it. The ban was put in place because of Apple's concerns that developers were paying Tapjoy to boost their game's ranking in the list of top 25 apps.

When an app uses this system, a user is incentivized in some way to install another unrelated app. The developer of the unrelated app then shares the revenue with the original app.

Tapjoy argues that incentivized promotions are "commonplace" and allow developers to create an additional revenue stream. The debate may be that Apple felt like it wasn't getting its fair share of that stream. According to VentureBeat, Tapjoy CEO Mihir Shah attempted to institute a compromise, where a cap "prevented developers from unfairly breaking into the top 25," but it was rejected by Apple.

A Tapjoy survey of developers showed that almost half had begun to receive a large number of customer complaints because of the "sudden inability" to earn in-game currency from installing other apps.

From Apple's perspective, this is a move to bring back fairness of app rankings.

Source: GameIndustry.biz


Comments

Re: Tapjoy Complains About Apple's Ban on 'Pay-Per-Install'

sooo apple banned payed for app advertisements (which no one likes anyways) and someones mad because of it?

tbh i'd pirate an app ( that advertises other things to me that are totally unrelated before i'd waste money on buying ads. and tbh if its worth pirating, its not even worth having, so i just won't have it :) ). unless they somehow (and i've yet to see it happen in small cell phone sized programs) make it completely out of my way so i don't get stuck accidentally clicking it. (EA has a good idea with intigrated little ads that don't do much but ADD to the games immersion)

i mean angry birds advertising angry birds isn't bad IMO as it shows me that theres other versions and neat merchandise i can get if i want. and they still keep it out of my face mostwhat so i dont' have the off chance of clicking it by mistake (Mighty eagle aside, that icon is a nuisance)

i hate ITunes with a passion, i truly do, as it blows on a Windows based system (lockups, memory hogging, crashes, etc..) but i ditched my Android phone for the Iphone ASAP when i could (and payed only $20 to upgrade early... well worth it though)

part of the reason.. the apps on android are so either compeltely useless, or ad ridden it makes them hard to use at all.

so suffering Itunes is hardly a pain, since i can ignore its ads unless i WANT to see them, same goes for other bits on the phone.

i do hope Apple flips them right off.. throw a brother bird at them and knock down their little wall of consumer paid for advertising to said consumer.

if i want an ad shoved in my face every 5 seconds i'll get cable or sattelite.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOkay, so I guess I'm not making sense of #notyourshield because it doesn't make any sense.09/18/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenI'd really only count three as being "death of gamer" articles and only one as arguably going a bit far with "gamers are young white dudes" stuff.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenMost are really just a look at the crap that happened the previous day when Sarkeesian's new video came out and almost all are exceedingly clear that they're talking about the specific gamers who are being obnoxious.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Yep, I had only seen two. I looked at the 12 you sent and while I had seen a few of them, I didn't think to count them. Some aren't about gamers at all. One's just highlighting two others. One is a Gamasutra community member blog post.09/18/2014 - 5:15pm
Michael Chandrawould clearly not apply, since they weren't used as shield. It's more "hey, just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm CISWASP."09/18/2014 - 5:08pm
Michael ChandraIn comparison though, the more extreme views would be fairly countered with "you don't speak for me". But the batshit crazy people tend not to even use others as the shield to defend their batshit crazy ideas and insults, so at that point #notyourshield09/18/2014 - 5:06pm
Michael ChandraWhich is of course real silly because when there are so many horrible stories and statistics too, it's utterly irrelevant whether some don't mind.09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael ChandraIn this context it would be women claiming they don't see a problem with the stuff, so stop claiming women don't like it!09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael Chandra"You don't speak for me. I am not your shield. You cannot use me to defend your own opinion."09/18/2014 - 4:59pm
Michael ChandraAE, if we leave aside the falsehoods some use with the term, the idea is regarding minorities and such.09/18/2014 - 4:58pm
Michael ChandraKrono did just a bit earlier in the shoutbox prh99.09/18/2014 - 4:56pm
Andrew EisenI still don't get the what #notyourshield is supposed to mean. Who is unfairly using who as a shield for what?09/18/2014 - 4:43pm
prh99Didn't said anything about #notyourshield or it's origins. Assuming your comment was directed at me.09/18/2014 - 4:28pm
prh99Leigh Alexander is right though, no one has to cater to them (trolls). I think a lot of them would likely continue playing even if scantily clad women were omitted or protagonist was female.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael ChandraSo no, normal gamers feeling attacked was not what sparked #notyourshield and only a fool would suggest otherwise.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael Chandra#NotYourShield was kickstarted by 4chan people, so don't go and make nonsense claims about that.09/18/2014 - 4:20pm
prh99those toxic individuals conduct their trolling under. It could have easily been under the Men Rights banner etc, they are just generally unpleasant and angry people who can't stand people disagreeing with them. 09/18/2014 - 4:00pm
prh99The whole gamer identity is the scapegoat some have latched onto in the wake of gamergate. I am sure it will fade, only to be replaced with the next thing, it always is. I am not so sure removal of identity will fix the problem, it's just the banner..09/18/2014 - 3:55pm
E. Zachary KnightAs for the whole "death of gamer" thing, I am personally patiently waiting for the day when being a person who plays games is as much of an identity as a person who reads books, watches tv/movie, listens to music. It will happen.09/18/2014 - 2:42pm
E. Zachary KnightThought I would share this io9 article as a bit of a rebuttal to the earlier Spider-man/Spider-woman comparison: http://io9.com/10-stupid-arguments-people-use-to-defend-comic-book-sex-163638182409/18/2014 - 2:41pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician