id Software Cautious on Wii U Development

June 8, 2011 -

While the teams that create such hardcore game franchises as Battlefield and Darksiders may be embracing Nintendo's Wii U platform, id Software creative director Tim Willits has his doubts about the viability of such content on the platform. Speaking to Eurogamer at E3 this week, Willits said that he has a lot of doubts that there is an audience on the platform for the games his company makes. id Software is currently working on its post apocalyptic shooter Rage for PC, PS3, and Xbox 360.

"The Nintendo market is a tough market for us to get into," said Willits. "A lot of first party games, a lot of licensed games – those are the ones that have done the best on that platform. I'd love it if we can get a hardcore FPS community going and build on it, but it's tough."

"I think we should keep our toes where we know best," he added.

Willits also said that his studio is not in any hurry for Microsoft or Sony to bring new consoles to market, citing the stability of both platforms as the core reason.

"If they want to stack another year or two on this generation I'd be more than happy. I know somebody is working on it somewhere but I don't want to hear about it."

Rage is set for a release in September.

Source: Eurogamer

Posted in

Comments

Re: id Software Cautious on Wii U Development

I think they run into two basic problems:

(1) The hardcore FPS community is bending over backwards to hate the WiiU, even though they could easily be a group that would benifit greatly from it.  They, more then any other game demographic, seem to have the biggest social barrier to new things that deviate from acceptable pissing points.

(2) Developing for a platform that has a significant unique feature is always a rick.  Develop stuff for the PS3, XBox, or PC and you can have pretty much idential gameplay on all three platforms, thus all you have to really do is deal with middleware and tweak the build.  A unique feature means either producing a unique gameplay experince or ignoring the feature.

Re: id Software Cautious on Wii U Development

Actually, from id's POV, I think there are two other legit concerns:

(1) Nintendo's history of avoiding 'adult' content going back to the days of Mortal Kombat, which is a big part of the reason that they have no real third party support right now.

(2) How modern will the system truly be. Nintendo has promised HD after their last console was intentionally last gen on graphics, but 'next gen' on innovation with the remotes. But the questions remains whether Nintendo can deliver.

Re: id Software Cautious on Wii U Development

*nods* I could see both of those too, though (1) is probably a much smaller concern then it was in previous decades.

Re: id Software Cautious on Wii U Development

It may not be as much of a concern now, no, but Nintendo has already dug themselves the hole on the matter. Because of both content and graphics, Nintendo is viewed as the kiddie/family console.

It's going to take a lot to change that perception.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightGot that same recommendation on Twitter. So I guess that is a good sign.09/15/2014 - 8:39pm
prh99Portlandia, though I don't watch a lot of sitcoms. Heard it was good though.09/15/2014 - 8:02pm
E. Zachary KnightSitcom recommendations for someone who like Parks and Rec but hates The Office: Go.09/15/2014 - 6:08pm
NeenekoEven if they do change their policy, they can only do it moving forward and I could see the mod/pack community simply branching.09/15/2014 - 12:50pm
Michael ChandraAs for take the money and run, the guy must have a networth of 8~9 digits already.09/15/2014 - 10:33am
Michael ChandraMe, I'm more betting on some form of mod API where servers must run donations/payments through them and they take a cut.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraEspecially since they want it for promoting their phones. Killing user interest is the dumbest move to make.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraGiven how the EULA actively allows for LPs, I'm not sure Microsoft is ready for the backlash of disallowing that.09/15/2014 - 10:31am
Matthew Wilsonthey wont do that, the backlash would be too big.09/15/2014 - 10:25am
ConsterSleaker: how is that a flipside? Sounds to me like that's basically what Notch himself said, except rudely.09/15/2014 - 10:18am
MaskedPixelanteOn the plus side, no more lazy Minecraft LPs, since iirc Microsoft has a strict "no monetization period" policy when it comes to their stuff.09/15/2014 - 10:13am
james_fudgeBut it continues to sell on every platform it is on, so there's that09/15/2014 - 10:09am
james_fudgeOh, well that's another matter :)09/15/2014 - 10:08am
E. Zachary KnightNothing against Notch here. I think it is great that he made something so cool. I just can't understand how it is worth $2.5 bil09/15/2014 - 9:59am
InfophileWhat a world we live in: Becoming a billionaire was the easy way out for Notch.09/15/2014 - 9:42am
james_fudgelots of hate for Notch here. I don't get it. Sorry he made a game everyone loved. What a monster he is!09/15/2014 - 9:37am
SleakerOn the flipside, Notch has been a horrible CEO for Mojang, and the company has grown on sheer inertia, DESPITE being mishandled over and over.09/15/2014 - 9:33am
SleakerI can understand Notch's statements he made to Kotaku about growing bigger than he intended, and getting hate for EULA changes he didn't enact.09/15/2014 - 9:32am
MaskedPixelantehttp://pastebin.com/n1qTeikM Notch's statement about the MS acquisition. He wanted out for a long time and this was the easiest way.09/15/2014 - 9:08am
ConsterEh, I can't blame him.09/15/2014 - 9:01am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician