Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for Entertainment

June 20, 2011 -

New research, based on three different surveys, finds that parents want a universal ratings system for all media formats. The research, which gathered the responses of 2,300 adults from three different surveys found that most parents were generally satisfied with ratings related to television, movies, video games, music, and handheld devices. Nevertheless, a majority of surveyed felt there should be some sort of universal rating system for all media, including web sites, music CDs, and games played on handheld devices.

Some parents also said that the differences in the ratings systems for different types of media were often inconsistent and confusing, though most complained about television ratings that didn't properly convey what kinds of content a given program contained.

Researchers say the opinions differed widely depending on whether participants identified themselves as frequent or infrequent churchgoers. Around 15 percent of infrequent churchgoers indicated they would always filter out "sexy commercials," and 6 percent found these commercials inappropriate for all ages. Around 39 percent of frequent churchgoers indicated they would filter out sexy commercials, and 21 percent found them inappropriate for all viewers.

"Our studies revealed that parents not only want changes to the ratings, but that they would support the creation of a universal system," the researchers write. "Given that we are well on the way to digital 'convergence,' where one can watch movies, television shows, or video games all on the same device, it seems that the time may be right to begin seriously considering taking this next step to improve media ratings."

The research is published in the July issue of Pediatrics.

It should be noted that the study did not specifically address anything other than Television. Parents seemed to be perturbed with the way TV ratings are inconsistent. Perhaps the ratings system needs to be tweaked to be more accurate. Perhaps it's a failing of the TV shows that use them.

Source: WebMD

Posted in

Comments

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

The more I look at ratings systems the more I am convinced that they are all a mistake.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

Because apparently having a list of things a game contains on the box is too complex...

Now I'm not saying that every rating system is perfect, but come on parents it's not that hard to tell if something is suitable for your kids.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

In the abstract, I can see the appeal of a universal content rating system--everyone only has to learn one system, and it could (in theory) be consistent across all forms of media.

When I consider applying the idea, however, it strikes me as...impractical, at best.

1) In order to provide sufficient detail to satisfy parental units, the system would have to be rather complex and unwieldy, because people have different standards for different media. A description of violence in a song is often perceived very differently from a graphic depiction of violence, for example. The actual "appropriate age" rating could remain fairly simple, but it would be even more arbitrary than in the current rating systems, and people would have to rely heavily on the fine-print reasons for the rating.

This is not an insurmountable problem, by any means, but it seems to somewhat undermine the advantages of consistency and simplicity of a single system.

2) A multi-industry ratings body would have to be formed to develop a consensus on proper ratings and apply them. The industries involved are often in direct competition with each other for entertainment dollars. I foresee extensive political jockeying and attempts to manipulate the system for the benefit of one media type or another, at the cost of fairness and validity in the ratings system itself.

3) The scope alluded to in the article is insane. You could probably overcome enough other hurdles to produce a system to cover games, movies, and music. After all, there are systems and rating bodies already in place for each, and they work reasonably well on their own. You could shoehorn them together somehow.

The real scope problem arises when you look at this bit: "web sites...and games played on handheld devices". Suddenly, we're not talking about the corporate media model the ratings bodies are designed to handle. We're talking about material that anyone can create and publish--personal blogs, games written by a lone programmer hacking around with a phone, photo sharing sites, and so forth. This is content being produced at an incredible pace, and which can change radically in a single day.

Who's going to review and rate it all? How relevant could the rating be by the time it's applied? You would have to rely on some sort of automated system--with which we've already seen problems in nanny software blacklists, and which is wildly impractical for images at present--or we'd have to rely on people to rate their own material as they publish it. So much for consistency and reliability.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

Won't happen.  Never will.  The argument of a universal ratings system always get brought up every so often, but it gets shot down pretty promptly and always for the same reasons: doing so would be clunky and unwieldy.  What's considered acceptable in one medium may not be considered acceptable in another.  And who decides the criteria?  Invevitably, you end up running into that brick wall that is the First Amendment.  That more than anything else is why such a concept will never fly in this country.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

That and the MPAA has a stranglehold on their system.  They won't relenquish that madness to anyone else and any other ratings boards would be imbeciles to let the MPAA take them over.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

I'm guessing the reason is that the MPAA would probably abuse the rating system to neuter other mediums.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

A uni system would be nice, base levels on context and members are randomly picked every 2 years as so the ranrting levels can be updated or tweak so that classic country and modern rap are on the same level contextually if they sing about drugs,violence,womanizing and other adult things. THis dose not mean they should be for adults only it needs soemthign more than bad or light use of adult trems to be risen to the level where its 17+ only.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

As long as it's not too complicated, like TV. Why they don't use movie ratings for TV is beyond me. No more than 6 like we use now. Movies use 5 (lans EC).

And most of all, they have to quit being more strict on games than movies.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

MPAA owns copyright to their rating system(if I remember correctly, the video game industry did ask the MPAA if they could use the movie rating system and the MPAA turned them down).

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

Plus, well, MPAA ratings are hard to find on the box.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

Kinda like the idea of a universal rating system. Provided the don't start basing laws on it that is.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

Alas, some a$$hole will try it.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Research: Parents Want a Universal Ratings System for ...

Nah, there isn't a soul dumb enough *CoughLelandYeeCough* to try such a thing. Especially if SCOTUS finds in favor of EMA.

Sorry... Been fighting something all week. >_>

_____________________________________________________________________________

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Atlanta Video Games Examiner for examiner.com

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaCrashHey Neo, that bit with "he instigated it"? That is called victim blaming. Stop it.10/25/2014 - 11:05pm
KronoAnd a rebuttal to that article: https://medium.com/@cainejw/an-actual-statistical-analysis-of-gamergate-dfd809858f6810/25/2014 - 9:42pm
Technogeekhttp://www.newsweek.com/gamergate-about-media-ethics-or-harassing-women-harassment-data-show-27973610/25/2014 - 8:54pm
TechnogeekAnd speaking of harassment and Gamergate, Newsweek had a social media analytics company analyze the hashtag in the interest of finding out what the movement was really about. The results should surprise absolutely nobody at this point.10/25/2014 - 8:54pm
Neo_DrKefkaI was called a traitor for speaking out on harassment and I was put on a list for people on twitter to mass report me. Only GamerGate site that has come out of this that has been reputable would be TechRaptor. 2/210/25/2014 - 7:09pm
Neo_DrKefka@Neeneko The reason why I ended my support of #GamerGate was the fact KingofPol (The guy who was sent the knife) ended up saying crap about those with autism. At this point I confronted the community and some big wig writers on the #GamerGate side. 1/210/25/2014 - 7:08pm
NeenekoIt would also mean they have to confront that the sites already mostly cater to them and wiping that small percentage of otherness just does not justify new sites.10/25/2014 - 6:55pm
Neeneko@ quiknkold - problem is it has never been about freedom, it is about dominance, ownership, and priviliage. women and minorities should be the ones leaving and creating their own spaces, not them!10/25/2014 - 6:54pm
Neo_DrKefka@Mecha I hear you about KingofPol this is a guy who is using GamerGate to boost his career. Most of his streams are crap about him talking about him being drunk. What happened to him was wrong but it doesn't change the fact he has instigated much of this10/25/2014 - 5:40pm
Craig R.And I'll be perfectly happy in never seeing the phrase 'false flag' ever again, as it is one of the worst notions to ever come out of the camp of the tinfoil brigade that is already completely overused.10/25/2014 - 3:50pm
Craig R.Gone for a week and come back to find GG didn't go away at all. Dammit.10/25/2014 - 3:48pm
Matthew Wilsonif they were serious, they would go to youtube. most youtube game reviewers tend to revew games as product, and tend leave social issues out of it.10/25/2014 - 1:42pm
quiknkoldif the gamergaters were serious, they'd realize that Kotaku and Polygon arent the only games in town, and that with the freedom of the internet, they could create their own websites and achieve the goals they are trying to achieve without arguement.10/25/2014 - 1:35pm
james_fudgehe should have called the police.10/25/2014 - 1:20pm
TechnogeekAt least my statement still holds if it does turn out to be a false flag.10/25/2014 - 1:03pm
NeenekoThough I admit, since doxxing and false flag where heavily used tactics of the GG supporters, while they are not historical tactics used by detractors, I am skeptical how much it is really 'both sides' doing it in any real volume.10/25/2014 - 1:01pm
NeenekoOne thing that makes all of this messy is 'false flag' is a serious concern here. It does not help that the original GG instigators were also known for doing elaborate false flags to discredit feminism themselves.10/25/2014 - 12:59pm
MechaCrashThe guy who got the knife is the one who advocated doxxing, by the way, and was getting court documents about Zoe Quinn so he could publicly post them. It doesn't make what happened to him right, but he deserves no sympathy.10/25/2014 - 12:42pm
TechnogeekNo, that's a pretty shitty thing to do and I fully support the responsible parties getting a visit from the relevant legal authorities.10/25/2014 - 12:17pm
Neo_DrKefkaSomeone anyone tell me how two wrongs somehow make a right? This is becoming exhausting and both sides are out of there minds!10/25/2014 - 11:40am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician