Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for 'All Who Care About Kids'

June 27, 2011 -

As you can probably guess even before you read the official statement from Common Sense Media, they are not pleased with the Supreme Court's ruling on Brown v. EMA today. The children’s advocacy group said in its reaction statement to the decision that they were disappointed and felt that parents had been let down by the court.

But the Supreme Court isn't congress or the president of the United States; in other words they should really only concern themselves with their area expertise - the law as it relates to our constitution. Nevertheless the group that is squarely against the videogame industry voiced its strong opinion that the court erred in its decision. Below is the full statement from Common Sense Media CEO James Steyer:

"Today’s decision is a disappointing one for parents, educators, and all who care about kids. But the fight is far from over. Advocates for kids and families can work within the scope of this ruling to protect the best interests of kids. An overwhelmingly high percentage of parents would support a bill that would prevent their kids from walking into a store and buying the most ultra-violent and sexually violent of video games. That decision should be in the hands of parents, not kids or video game vendors, and certainly not the video game ratings board, which recently approved the Dead Space 2 ad campaign that clearly markets a Mature-rated game to kids. We respectfully disagree with the Court when it comes to their analysis of the First Amendment rights of children and families -- this is a sanity issue, not a censorship issue.

If parents decide a violent game is okay for their kid, that’s one thing, but millions of kids are not able to judge the impact of ultra-violence on their own. Today, the multi-billion dollar video game industry is celebrating the fact that their profits have been protected, but we will continue to fight for the best interests of kids and families. Moreover, we look forward to working with national and state policy makers on another common sense solution in the very near future.
"

Thanks to Andrew Eisen for the tip.


Comments

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

"That decision should be in the hands of parents, not kids or video game vendors, and certainly not the video game ratings board..."

This needs a little editing. Give me a second.

"That decision should be in the hands of the goverment, not kids parents, or video game vendors, and certainly not the video game ratings board..."

Fixed. Crappy Sense Media they are.

 

 - W

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Ah Common Sense Media. Media with no sense what-so-ever.

Common Sense isn't that common, that is why it should be renamed to Good Sense.

==============

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Their name is ironic.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

....this is a sanity issue, not a censorship issue.

Nope. It's a censorship issue. Unless such a law is tailored to take into account the similar impact of other forms of media on the same cognitive functions, it is tailored to censor a specific kind of speech. Even the Supreme Court hinted at the dichotomy of singling out computer games.

Until someone comes up with a law that does not discriminate against a specific kind of media, it will, now and always, fall into the censorship box.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

I´ll be translating:

- If parents decide a violent game is okay for their kid, that’s one thing, but millions of kids are not able to judge the impact of ultra-violence on their own.

Kids and parents are stupid as fuck. We are the ones who will take all desicions for them. No one else but us knows what is right.

- Today, the multi-billion dollar video game industry is celebrating the fact that their profits have been protected,

That´s unfair. We must get a cut of all that profit just because we exist to complain about everything we don´t like.

- but we will continue to fight for the best interests of kids and families.

We will expend more money from donations to push our agenda and opinions inside the throats of everybody.

- Moreover, we look forward to working with national and state policy makers on another common sense solution in the very near future."

We´ll also encourage more politicians to keep wasting tax money to supress freedom of speech for everyone. We are insane and we´ll prove it in the very near future.

 

Dear CSM:

Please stop. You hate freedom of speech. You hate anything that is different from your warped worldview. "Common sense" is the one last thing you should be appealing, because nothing of what you do is even sane.

You even hate children and don´t care for them. They are just tools to keep pushing your ridiculous ideas on the throats of everybody else and don´t care for the laws of your very own country.

You have failed again in understand what the people really need from you, and the events of the past monday just proves how wrong you really are and your methods will get you nowhere.

You are useless and a waste of time for everybody. You have lost the war.

 

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Dear Common Sense Media,

I will listen to you when you treat all forms of media equally. Until then... you just sound dumb.

-Ax

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Dear Common Sense Media,

 

 Everytime I read one of your press releases, I just have the sudden urge to play New York Echo and yell:

 

SHUT THE F^(K UP!

 

 

Your Eternal and Implaciable enemy,

Ada

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Yes, of course.  Since I don't agree with you, and am not disappointed by this ruling, I must not care about kids.  Bravo, CSM.  Way to win hearts and minds with your open and inclusive attitude.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

As much as I hate resorting to memes:

 

The sarcasm! IT'S OVER 9000!!!

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Im starting to think they care/think a bit too much about children O_o

its the parents right to choose making a law that forces a choice on them is not choosing.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Just in case you care about what the Parents Television Council has to say, check this : https://www.parentstv.org/PTC/news/release/2011/0627a.asp

"We call on the Entertainment Merchants Association to redouble its efforts for increased enforcement of the industry’s age-based vending restrictions. The Federal Trade Commission and the PTC’s own ‘Secret Shopper’ campaigns have routinely demonstrated an abysmal failure rate for video game retailers to uphold the industry’s own age-based restrictions. With the exception of GameStop, many in the video game industry appear to be either unwilling or unable to prevent the sale of M-rated games to kids. Now with no threat of consequence for failure, we are concerned that the self-regulatory efforts will be violated in even greater numbers than they already are. We will be monitoring this very closely."

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

 That's an outright lie. Videogame retailers have the highest enforcement rate of any media.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/04/violentkidsent.shtm

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Yes, but since they're the hot new thing, anything belo 200% means their system is a completel failure.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

It's the PTC, lying to push an agenda (which includes making money) is just what they do. I wish Vince/WWE would have really stuck it to them when WWE's lawyers had the chance instead of settling.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

I know about that.

And for the record, I absolutely fucking hat the PTC, especially since their so called leader didn't have the balls do say anything against one of our greatest comedians until AFTER he passed away.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

That FTC info is pretty facinating. 13% of kid were able to buy M rated games compared to the 33% who could get tickets to R rated movies, 47% who could get unrated dvds, and 64% who could buy CD with Parental Warning labels.  (As if the fact that a kid was tryin to buy a CD in the first place wasn't a big enough clue).

The store with the worst record, where 20% of kids could buy M rated games was Walmart.  But thats still less than the 30% of kid who could walk into Walmart and get an Unrated DVD.  So a kid that goes in Walmart is more likely to walk out with the Unrated version of Saw than they are a GTA game.

What do these numbers tell me?  Common Sense Media should be holding up the game industry as the model on how to prevent kids from getting violent media.  But instead the try to demonize it instead.

Well , whatever, thankyou SCOTUS and ESRB keep up the excellent work.

 

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

I'm tempted to go to the extreme and say that 13% is still too high (Ideally we would not like any kids playing ultra-gorey games like Manhunt or what-have-you, right?), but, hey, let's get our priorities right and focus on the other mediums that are failing to do age-checks before lambasting games.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Half of that statement is what wikipedia calls "weasel words."

 

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Sorry but "will someone think of the children" argument isn't going to work forever. Heck its not even as effective as it was years ago.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

"this is a sanity issue, not a censorship issue."

 

He's double-plus-correct. We love you big brother!

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

"Today, the multi-billion dollar video game industry is celebrating the fact that their profits have been protected,"

 

I'm sick of hearing this. Really. It's here and in Yee's response. Since when did the gaming industry become the tobacco industry or fast-food industry? They are not out there to make a buck out of corrupting young children. The game industry is full of creative minds who do a fantastic job at telling stories and creating intereting experiences. They are artists. They are not evil boogeymen in suits.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Except Bobby Kotick.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Encouraging for ...

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

You're wrong. You're wrong. You're wrong.

James Steyer is also a motard. SCOTUS' correct decision today is actually encouraging for parents, as it keeps the decision-making in their hands, not takes it away. It only takes away the states' right to restrict access of "violent" material to minors in place of the parents. It also didn't take away the retailers' right to regulate their own employees, it took away the states' right to do so in place of the retailers.

Therefore, that would-be pedophile Steyer is not fighting for the best interests of kids or parents.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

You're dissapointing for all those caring for commen sense.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

i still want to know of these "sexually violent" games these people constantly refer too.

tmk there aren't any actually violent ones on the american market (outside of those played out in some peoples uninformed skulls), but i could be wrong, and either way aren't they already essentially

a. age restricted BY LAW

b. effectivelly banned from general retail sales anyways under the same laws

 

??

the rest i can understand, but they said it themselves, the PARENTS should choose. though it contradicts their purpose in FORCING the parents to choose by fining them under law, they almost got the picture.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Apparently "common sense" was redefined when no one was looking.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

 'common sense' was always crap.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Um...I care about my kid and everyone else's and I'm perfectly happy with the decision.

So...if we should be able to decide what our kids play, why are you supporting a bill that would let the government take that decision away from us?

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Seconded.  I'm a parent, a gamer, and I've worked on a few "ultra-violent" video games, and I fully support the decision.

And let me be clear.  I don't think kids should play really violent games.  But that's my decision to make for my kid.  I certainly wouldn't trust CSM, any government agency, or the ESRB to make that decision for me.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Eh.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

If parents decide a violent game is okay for their kid, that’s one thing, but millions of kids are not able to judge the impact of ultra-violence on their own.

you would think that common sense dictates that those millions of kids also have parents but then again, as usual, CSM lacks any

岩「if Phyllis Schlafly wants to undo Women's Rights, she should lead by example and get back in the kitchen」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

Common Sense Media: Caring about your kids so you don't have to.

Re: Common Sense Media: SCOTUS Decision Disappointing for ...

 Ah.. caring about kids... the Goodwin of modern politics...

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Wonderkarpgot my Reading Rainbow kickstarter rewards....I cant tell if this is a sticker or a bumper sticker.01/30/2015 - 5:38pm
Goth_SkunkAs such, the first playthrough is always going to be the most evocative.01/30/2015 - 3:47pm
Goth_SkunkSo while branching storyline is hallmarked as a feature of the game, the storyline never stays branched for too long. There is a linear story that may branch at points, but each branch always comes right back to the main line further down the road.01/30/2015 - 3:46pm
Goth_SkunkMy biggest gripe about it though would have to be that its replay value sucks. I quickly learned that apart from a few key decisions you make, most choices end up not being relevant because something terrible happens anyway.01/30/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_SkunkI *love* The Walking Dead. Like I said, I played Season 1 through in one go, and subsequently pre-purchased Season 2 in its entirety sight-unseen.01/30/2015 - 3:43pm
Andrew EisenBy the by, I take it you're a fan of Telltale's Walking Dead? I'm one of the very few who really doesn't like it. Bums me out.01/30/2015 - 3:39pm
Andrew EisenI think we're safe with stuff like Life is Strange, Resident Evil: Revelations 2, and TellTale's games. I was thinking more along the lines of D4. It's genuinely up in the air whether we'll get a conclusion to that story or not.01/30/2015 - 3:33pm
Goth_SkunkUltimately, from this potentially ignorant perspective, it's the gamer who assumes the risk, not the developer. I don't approve. Fortunately, I'm only paying $5 (CDN, no less), so that's money I can easily write off if I'm disappointed.01/30/2015 - 3:32pm
Goth_SkunkIf I'm wrong, and the unthinkable should happen where the developer ends up aborting production of the rest of the episodes, bundle purchasers would be understandably upset. Even moreso if attempting to get a refund turns out to be a hassle.01/30/2015 - 3:30pm
Goth_SkunkThere is an option on XBL to purchase all episodes in a bundle. Pay full price now, get the rest of the episodes as they're released. I would like to think this means that the other episodes are in fact done and ready.01/30/2015 - 3:29pm
Andrew EisenCatch 22 sometimes. Some gamers don't want to buy it if there's no guarantee the whole thing will come out and the whole thing can't come out unless enough people buy the early installments.01/30/2015 - 3:17pm
Goth_SkunkI sincerely hope this trend towards episodic games is not done so because the developer only had enough capital to produce the first 1/5th of the story and is banking on making enough money from the sales of that fifth to produce the rest.01/30/2015 - 3:16pm
Goth_SkunkThat being said, I want to try Life is Strange to get my feet wet.01/30/2015 - 3:13pm
Andrew EisenI'm that way too. I'll wait until the whole thing is out. Same goes for DVDs of TV shows. I'll wait for the season set.01/30/2015 - 3:13pm
Goth_SkunkIf an episodic game is really good, and the time between episodes is more than a week, I'm more inclined to wait for the rest of the episodes to all come out than to try playing it episode by episode at launch date.01/30/2015 - 3:12pm
Goth_SkunkAs someone who played through TWD Season 1 entirely in one day, and then played Season 2 episode by episode when they each came out, I strongly agree with this sentiment.01/30/2015 - 3:11pm
Goth_SkunkFrom what I've been hearing, people haven't been buying it because they're sick of episodic games where they have to wait 6 weeks or more between episodes and they'd rather just wait for the whole thing to come out at once.01/30/2015 - 3:10pm
Andrew EisenNot sure what GamerGate could do to dissuade people from buying a game they'd otherwise be interested in or why it would even want to but I agree, I think the premise is interesting and look forward to learning more about how it actually plays.01/30/2015 - 2:58pm
Goth_SkunkAnd for what it's worth, I saw Life is Strange advertised today on XBL, and the premise looks very, very intriguing. I'm going to buy it today and give it a shot.01/30/2015 - 2:42pm
Goth_SkunkI'm hearing rumours that the recently released game Life is Strange is not selling very well on Steam, and that GamerGate is being blamed as a result. It's just a rumour though.01/30/2015 - 2:42pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician