Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

June 27, 2011 -

California State Senator Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) issued a statement expressing his disappointment that the Supreme Court of the United States struck down California’s violent videogame law (Brown v. EMA), upholding a previous ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the law was unconstitutional.

Yee points out in his statement that while the decision was 7-2, only five agreed with the lower court's decision, two dissented completely, and two other Justices left the door open for a law that had a narrower focus on videogames. Justices Roberts and Alito said that a law could be more narrowly tailored and Justices Breyer and Thomas believed that California’s law was perfectly acceptable.

“Unfortunately, the majority of the Supreme Court once again put the interests of corporate America before the interests of our children,” said Yee, the author of the bill signed into law in 2005. “As a result of their decision, Wal-Mart and the video game industry will continue to make billions of dollars at the expense of our kids’ mental health and the safety of our community. It is simply wrong that the video game industry can be allowed to put their profit margins over the rights of parents and the well-being of children.”

Yee raised Justice Stephen Breyer who wrote the dissenting opinion.

"Justice Breyer, in his dissenting opinion, clearly understood the need to protect our children from the harmful effects of excessively violent video games and to give parents a tool in raising healthy kids," said Yee.

"While we did not win today, I am certain that this eight year legislative and legal battle has raised the consciousness of this issue for many parents and grandparents, and has forced the video game industry to do a better job at appropriately rating these games," said Yee.

He closed by saying that "every" national medical association agreed with the law he wrote:

"Every major national medical association – including the American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics – has concluded that exposure to violent video games causes an increase in aggressive behavior, physiological desensitization to violence, and decrease pro-social behavior," said Yee. "Thus, society has a direct, rational and compelling reason in marginally restricting a minor’s access to violent video games."

Of course, society also needs to use the tools already available to them, because they work. Ratings systems like the ESRB, smart phone apps that allow you to use the aforementioned ratings system right in the store while shopping, and parental controls on various consoles to keep kids from playing games that aren't meant for their consumption. We can't let the government raise our kids for us, after all, even when they want to.

Source: Lelland Yee Website

Posted in

Comments

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

"Unfortunately, the majority of the Supreme Court once again put the interests of corporate America before the interests of our children ... As a result of their decision, Wal-Mart and the video game industry will continue to make billions of dollars at the expense of our kids’ mental health and the safety of our community"

Unfortunately, a politician once again used outright lies and well-worn rhetoric to try and win over the public to support his agenda.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

""Justice Breyer, in his dissenting opinion, clearly understood the need to protect our children from the harmful effects of excessively violent video games and to give parents a tool in raising healthy kids," said Yee."

I've always found it insulting how I'm considered "unhealthy" because I enjoy playing violent video games.

Yee doesn't give a shit for the "parents" or the "children", only his own pathetic agenda. If he cared for the parents then he wouldn't be trying to dictate the way a paren

-- Randi Tastix

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

If they had ruled in his favor he would have had nothing but praise for them, but since some of them dared go against him,, they "put corporate america before our children's well being." Sorry Yee, but you'll have ot actually be a parent, if you actually are one or don't have a nanny to do it for you

 

Plus parents already have that too, It's called the Entertainment Software Ratings Board.

And of course he says every medical association agrees with him, he expects people to take his word.

Won't be surprised if he wastes more money on another attempt agaisnt a group he likely never tired of picking on since high school

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Again, he mad.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

yee is an idiot. 

 

 

let him sink into obscurity now, we're done with him.........

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Amazing that we haven't heard from Jack yet.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

You're amazed?  We haven't heard from him in about a year and a half.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

He issued an empty threat against Valve earlier this year.   

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Do you have a link? I don't remember that. 

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

True, but as far as I know it was just that one letter.  Other than that, I've seen small quotes from him here and there but really, the man's been out of the public eye (the portion he was in, anyway) for a long time.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

True, but this is normally the kind of thing he sends out a mass email about.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Yeah, two years ago.

As I said, Thompson's been very, very quite since trying to sue Facebook.  Sure, he pops up now and then with a small quote or something but I'd actually be surprised if he did put out a press release.

That said, I'd certainly welcome it.  I bet it would be really entertaining.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

7-2, 5-4 either way Yee, you got slapped down. Get over it.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Trick is that 7-2 is much more bullet proof, even with 2 of the 7 "leaving the door open". Only a few lawmakers would try something similar for the next 10 years, and most if not all attemps will be shut down by their peers.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Thing is, Scalia and Kennedy in particular won't be around forever. Once Kennedy in particular retires, it's a crapshoot which way the Court will shift in the future. Fortunately, Breyer isn't getting younger either.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

I'm more worried about Thomas actually... in his disenting statement he didn't even bother to address most of the arguements the game industry presented. He addressed pretty much only one issue; free speech as it regards to minors. He basically would have let the law passed without a second thought. I mean Breyer may be wrong but atleast he addressed all the issues and presented reason (though wrong as they are)... in comparison Thomas seems utterly closed minded an irrational since he did not seem to care about the specifics of the case. I assume this might be why Yee mentioned Breyer but not Thomas

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Legal analysts are speculating that given good health, Scalia and Kennedy will both be around for at least another ten years.  Stevens retired at 91 and since then he's been even more active. 

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Yee has them RIGHT WHERE HE WANTS THEM! 

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

I love that his response to losing is basically the same one Jack Thompsons had when he was disbarred. "Just you wait until I make my comeback!"

 

 

http://www.popularculturegaming.com

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOoo, this one came down to the wire! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/749082525/nefarious09/19/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenI don't doubt that many are truly interested in journalistic integrity. The problem I'm often seeing is they seem to have no idea how or where to talk about it.09/18/2014 - 11:46pm
Andrew EisenDidn't word that well. Busy at work. I've seen people claim that GamerGate is solely about ethics and transparency in games journalism and then go on to show that what they're really after is silencing those who talk about gender issues in games.09/18/2014 - 11:45pm
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician