Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

June 27, 2011 -

California State Senator Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) issued a statement expressing his disappointment that the Supreme Court of the United States struck down California’s violent videogame law (Brown v. EMA), upholding a previous ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the law was unconstitutional.

Yee points out in his statement that while the decision was 7-2, only five agreed with the lower court's decision, two dissented completely, and two other Justices left the door open for a law that had a narrower focus on videogames. Justices Roberts and Alito said that a law could be more narrowly tailored and Justices Breyer and Thomas believed that California’s law was perfectly acceptable.

“Unfortunately, the majority of the Supreme Court once again put the interests of corporate America before the interests of our children,” said Yee, the author of the bill signed into law in 2005. “As a result of their decision, Wal-Mart and the video game industry will continue to make billions of dollars at the expense of our kids’ mental health and the safety of our community. It is simply wrong that the video game industry can be allowed to put their profit margins over the rights of parents and the well-being of children.”

Yee raised Justice Stephen Breyer who wrote the dissenting opinion.

"Justice Breyer, in his dissenting opinion, clearly understood the need to protect our children from the harmful effects of excessively violent video games and to give parents a tool in raising healthy kids," said Yee.

"While we did not win today, I am certain that this eight year legislative and legal battle has raised the consciousness of this issue for many parents and grandparents, and has forced the video game industry to do a better job at appropriately rating these games," said Yee.

He closed by saying that "every" national medical association agreed with the law he wrote:

"Every major national medical association – including the American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics – has concluded that exposure to violent video games causes an increase in aggressive behavior, physiological desensitization to violence, and decrease pro-social behavior," said Yee. "Thus, society has a direct, rational and compelling reason in marginally restricting a minor’s access to violent video games."

Of course, society also needs to use the tools already available to them, because they work. Ratings systems like the ESRB, smart phone apps that allow you to use the aforementioned ratings system right in the store while shopping, and parental controls on various consoles to keep kids from playing games that aren't meant for their consumption. We can't let the government raise our kids for us, after all, even when they want to.

Source: Lelland Yee Website

Posted in

Comments

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

"Unfortunately, the majority of the Supreme Court once again put the interests of corporate America before the interests of our children ... As a result of their decision, Wal-Mart and the video game industry will continue to make billions of dollars at the expense of our kids’ mental health and the safety of our community"

Unfortunately, a politician once again used outright lies and well-worn rhetoric to try and win over the public to support his agenda.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

""Justice Breyer, in his dissenting opinion, clearly understood the need to protect our children from the harmful effects of excessively violent video games and to give parents a tool in raising healthy kids," said Yee."

I've always found it insulting how I'm considered "unhealthy" because I enjoy playing violent video games.

Yee doesn't give a shit for the "parents" or the "children", only his own pathetic agenda. If he cared for the parents then he wouldn't be trying to dictate the way a paren

-- Randi Tastix

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

If they had ruled in his favor he would have had nothing but praise for them, but since some of them dared go against him,, they "put corporate america before our children's well being." Sorry Yee, but you'll have ot actually be a parent, if you actually are one or don't have a nanny to do it for you

 

Plus parents already have that too, It's called the Entertainment Software Ratings Board.

And of course he says every medical association agrees with him, he expects people to take his word.

Won't be surprised if he wastes more money on another attempt agaisnt a group he likely never tired of picking on since high school

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Again, he mad.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

yee is an idiot. 

 

 

let him sink into obscurity now, we're done with him.........

HUGE supporter of the Video Game Industry and the ECA!

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Amazing that we haven't heard from Jack yet.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

You're amazed?  We haven't heard from him in about a year and a half.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

He issued an empty threat against Valve earlier this year.   

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Do you have a link? I don't remember that. 

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

True, but as far as I know it was just that one letter.  Other than that, I've seen small quotes from him here and there but really, the man's been out of the public eye (the portion he was in, anyway) for a long time.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

True, but this is normally the kind of thing he sends out a mass email about.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Yeah, two years ago.

As I said, Thompson's been very, very quite since trying to sue Facebook.  Sure, he pops up now and then with a small quote or something but I'd actually be surprised if he did put out a press release.

That said, I'd certainly welcome it.  I bet it would be really entertaining.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

7-2, 5-4 either way Yee, you got slapped down. Get over it.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Trick is that 7-2 is much more bullet proof, even with 2 of the 7 "leaving the door open". Only a few lawmakers would try something similar for the next 10 years, and most if not all attemps will be shut down by their peers.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Thing is, Scalia and Kennedy in particular won't be around forever. Once Kennedy in particular retires, it's a crapshoot which way the Court will shift in the future. Fortunately, Breyer isn't getting younger either.

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

I'm more worried about Thomas actually... in his disenting statement he didn't even bother to address most of the arguements the game industry presented. He addressed pretty much only one issue; free speech as it regards to minors. He basically would have let the law passed without a second thought. I mean Breyer may be wrong but atleast he addressed all the issues and presented reason (though wrong as they are)... in comparison Thomas seems utterly closed minded an irrational since he did not seem to care about the specifics of the case. I assume this might be why Yee mentioned Breyer but not Thomas

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Legal analysts are speculating that given good health, Scalia and Kennedy will both be around for at least another ten years.  Stevens retired at 91 and since then he's been even more active. 

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

Yee has them RIGHT WHERE HE WANTS THEM! 

Re: Leland Yee Issues Statement on SCOTUS Ruling

I love that his response to losing is basically the same one Jack Thompsons had when he was disbarred. "Just you wait until I make my comeback!"

 

 

http://www.popularculturegaming.com

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://i5.minus.com/iN5o9iu1ON2NG.jpg "It cursed my gear? WHY WOULD IT DO THAT?! THIS GAME IS BUGGED!"04/24/2014 - 9:51pm
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician