Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

June 28, 2011 -

California Congressman Joe Baca (D-Rialto, CA) has unsuccessfully sought controls on violent videogames in the past, so it should come as no surprise that he is "disappointed" and shocked at the Supreme Court Decision to uphold the Ninth Circuit Court ruling on Brown v. EMA.

"I am disappointed the multi-billion dollar video game industry will continue to go unchecked in its ability to profit from selling heinous depictions of violence and sex to minors," Baca wrote in a statement issued Monday.

"Unfortunately, the industry is still not doing enough to provide parents with accurate information regarding the content of many games," Baca said, ignoring the ESRB and the latest Federal Trade Commission report that said that the videogame industry had the best record when it came to keeping mature rated content out of the hands of children.

"I continue to sponsor and advocate for legislation in the House of Representatives that would mandate all video games with a rating of 'Teen' or higher be sold with a cigarette style warning label, citing the health risks of excessive exposure to violent media."

Inland News Today


Comments

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

'"Unfortunately, the industry is still not doing enough to provide parents with accurate information regarding the content of many games," Baca said'

Baka is a good name.

He should really change his stance to be one of letting gamers apply settings in their OS or favorite DRM solution (Steam) that developers of games then use to apply changes to the games they play.  Because he will simply lose repeatedly.  More features in games creates a richer experience AND would satisfy his complaints at the exact same time.  Plus, such features as a profanity slider would be very easy to implement AND would potentially reduce the ESRB rating for the game (or allow a single game to carry multiple ESRB ratings), which directly translates to MORE MONEY.  Everyone wins!  The senator would win (moralistic complaints resolved), the gaming industry would win (more money), and you and I would win (more fun).

- Left4Dead

Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

- Left4Dead Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Nobody cares what you Wookiees think. You live on Endor, you make less sense.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

"...be sold with a cigarette style warning label, citing the health risks of excessive exposure to violent media."

WARNING: THIS NOTICE ABOUT THE DANGERS OF THE CONTENT OF THIS VIOLENT GAME IS OFFERED WITHOUT PRACTICAL EVIDENCE AND WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING OF ITS EFFECTS, POSSIBLY EVEN LYING TO MAKE YOU THINK YOU'RE BEING PROTECTED. PLEASE REFER TO THE ESRB FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE CONTENT OF THIS GAME AS IT WILL PROVIDE A BETTER METHOD OF DETERMINING IF THIS GAME IS APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR CHILD.

I think that about covers it.

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re:Congressman Baca Goes Off Rails Whining About SCOTUS Decision

Baca lives up to the Japanese meaning of his name, as the SCOTUS decision essentially guarantees his piece of shit bill is automatically unconstitutional.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Baka Baca.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

I was gonna say, at leasy his name is right.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Seeing the warning label thing for T rated games, I thought "Baca, don't be a baka!".  But the OP here beat me to saying it

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

I believe the grammaticly correct way to express what we are feeling is "Baca no baka"!

 

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

This is a delightfully shitty week for both Rebublicans and Democrats.  Gay marriage in NY pissing off Repubs. Blagojevich and this SCOTUS decision are losses for Dems.  When both parties lose, we all win. 

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

To be fair, all sides of the political spectrum were against videogames...  You can't tell me that Jack Thompson or the Eagle Forum are liberal... The attack on videogames is bi-partisan.  

They're an easy target for the old foggies in politics to point the finger at since the only people who like them/care about them are "those darn youngins".  And we all know young people don't vote.

So I wouldn't bring left or right into this, I'd say it has more to do with being old.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Plus a cheap way to seem like they're doing something without actually doing anything.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

I suppose we can at least take solace in the fact that, in ten years time these people's names will be cemented in history for all the reasons they didn't want them to be. They'll be viewed in much the same manner as the 'Rock and Roll is the devils music!' crowd of 50+ years ago.

Not the legacy they would have chosen, perhaps, but possibly the one they deserve.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

In ten years, nobody will even remember them at all.

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Unfortunately, the industry isn't doing enough...

Let's see, retailers 80% effective at preventing M-rated sales to minors, parental controls on all systems, content warnings on all ESRB labels...

WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT?!

Oh...bribes! That's right. We're not paying you enough.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is the most overturned court in the United States of America. Little what they do to makes sense but seeing how they push Liberal and Progressive views I doubt we will see anyone here or other blogs call for those Judges to be removed.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Just don't tell that to places like Free Republic or Eagle Forum.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Agreed with the rest of you. If this dumbass would just say "violent media" and then take issue with books, movies, and video games equally I might understand his vitroil. I don;t agree but I could at least understand it. But since he only called out video games we can label him the unconstitutional idiot that he is.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

I want people to call Congressman Baca and continually ask him why he has no faith in the FTC.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

"I am disappointed the multi-billion dollar music/movie/television industry will continue to go unchecked in its ability to profit from selling heinous depictions of violence and sex to minors"

 

Well Senator, as soon as you start enacting laws to limit the sale of violence and sex to minors across all forms of entertainment, THEN you can complain when the SCOTUS shoots one of them down.  Until then, what is good for the goose (movies, music, tv etc) is good for the gander (video games).

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

You have the saying wrong. In this case it is "What's good for the gander (music movies tv books etc) is not good for the goose (video games)"

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

What does the ESRB have to do?  If you want to find why a game got  its rating all you have to flip the case over.  ITs all there in black and white lettering.  Meanwhile the only indication of a movie's rating is typical found on the back in small hard to read grey lettering.  Why is it that video games are the only ones being attacked for not being perfect.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

Because old people hate new things.

It's depressing how simple that is, but entirely true.  Just look back through history.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Re: Congressman Joe Baca Rails Against SCOTUS Decision

""I am disappointed the multi-billion dollar video game industry will continue to go unchecked in its ability to profit from selling heinous depictions of violence and sex to minors," Baca wrote in a statement issued Monday."

And I continue to be disappointed that politicians, journalists (in general), and other such individuals who routinely rely on public statements to "inform" one another as well as the general public are not legally bound by the oath of "To Tell The Truth, The WHOLE Truth, And Nothing But The Truth".

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
benohawkI've had no issues so far08/04/2015 - 6:45pm
MattsworknameSame here so far, minus some issues with a few old games, it's been solid for me. I do think they need to adjust some of the interface in the start menu, but I can work with it08/04/2015 - 5:56pm
Matthew WilsonI like it, havent had any major issues.08/04/2015 - 5:45pm
MattsworknameSo, now t hta we have had time to mess with it, whats everyones view on windows 10?08/04/2015 - 5:43pm
james_fudgeNot I, said the fly.08/04/2015 - 4:31pm
Big PermAnyone use an Intel 750?08/04/2015 - 3:40pm
E. Zachary KnightSome great comments about gender diversity in game development from GDC Europe. http://gamasutra.com/view/news/250417/Women_in_the_game_industry_share_stories_of_improving_diversity.php08/04/2015 - 3:11pm
Sora-Chan@EZK: It's kind sad that kind of thing still occurs to this day (and for good reasons...)08/04/2015 - 2:33pm
E. Zachary KnightA woman author shares her experience submitting her manuscript to publishing agents under a man's name. http://jezebel.com/homme-de-plume-what-i-learned-sending-my-novel-out-und-172063762708/04/2015 - 1:21pm
james_fudgeme either. They are rolling it out in phases.08/04/2015 - 12:41pm
Big PermI haven't got my notification yet, even though I reserved it the day the pop up came.08/04/2015 - 12:27pm
james_fudgeThanks Matthew. I have not yet installed Windows 10, but the complaints about it have been minimal.08/04/2015 - 12:19pm
benohawkhttp://goo.gl/6yZ7EO suggests you can kill it all, but I haven't tested it on my system as of yet. And I wouldn't recommend digging in the registry or playing around withdisabling services for most users08/04/2015 - 12:18pm
Matthew Wilsonyes you can turn it off08/04/2015 - 12:15pm
james_fudgeCan you completely disable it though? I think you can minimize what it collects.08/04/2015 - 12:06pm
benohawkThe Win 10 data collection sounds scary, but I think it would be just too much data to be useful08/04/2015 - 11:57am
benohawkNo need to apologize Big Perm08/04/2015 - 11:55am
benohawkThe changing to 0 only being a 1 was local security policy change, not the reghack08/04/2015 - 11:49am
Big PermSorry Beno, it looks like you're right.08/04/2015 - 11:49am
Big PermFrom what I've heard (and obviously I could be wrong here), but I hear even setting it to "0" in the registry will only change to "1" or "Basic" collection. I'll try to find the article I got this from08/04/2015 - 11:40am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician