Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

July 13, 2011 -

A new study, "Media Use and Child Sleep: The Impact of Content, Timing, and Environment,” comes to the conclusion that "screen time" before bed can cause restless nights for preschoolers. The new study was conducted by Michelle Garrison Ph.D., a research scientist at the Seattle Children’s Research Institute. The findings were published in the July 2011 issue of Pediatrics.

"A lot of the research had lumped all media use together,” said Michelle Garrison. "Reducing media use altogether is an overwhelming goal for a lot of families. There are healthy media choices that families can be making."

She added that the goal is to shift away from violent content to content that is educational and has social value.

The study found that having any screen time (violent or otherwise) before bedtime seemed to cause sleep problems in young children. Researchers pointed the finger at all kinds of screen time too - from television shows and video games to mobile phone games. Most of the violent screen time for preschoolers came from TV shows intended for older kids, which usually featured some sort of animated or comic violence.

Garrison acknowledged that changing children's behavior isn’t easy but finding creative ways to do it is important.

Source: ConsumerReports.org


Comments

Re: Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

As I was growing up and my parents put me in a bedroom instead of having a whole Basement to myself I found from that time on till I got my own room that I couldn't sleep at nights. The area was getting too bad to go out and play (My parents were Liberals who stayed in an area of a white flight until the murders and drug dealers were too much to deal with many years later) and then from 97-99 they tried to take away all forms of video games because I couldn't sleep at night and believe me there is nothing better then staying up from 8PM when told to go to bed and not falling asleep until 2AM well looking at the walls....

My mother is Polish so she was too cheap to think to take me to the doctor thinking it was something with my behavior rather then I could of had something like insominia?

Kids need to get treated to see why they are so restless instead of playing the blame game. Yes video games can be the cause but so too can be overloading a kid with homework. But it can also be something like insominia which even though Doctor Feminist Mom thinks she knows everything, she doesn't.

 

Re: Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

Most electronic devices have these things called "off buttons" which usually terminate the function of the device.

Plus, why does all content HAVE to have education and social value? Can't it just be fun?

Re: Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

Uh wait I thought this article was on how certain types of media will keep kids up later... which I kinda have to say a big duh to.  The more energetic the media the more likely kids will be wide awake after.

That being said there are points I disagree with you on... though relevance to this article I am not entirely certain on.  I mean the reverse, can't media that is fun also be educational and have social value?  The best games out there don't need to proclaim themselves educational, rather teach more by coincidence than anything else.  Games set in historical settings, assuming not horribly inaccurate will teach some history.  Games about finding ways through test chambers witha portal gun can help develop spatial skills, and actually teach about good comedy.

I don't think the problem is always violence, but honestly watching something violent before bed isn't the best way to get to sleep, especially for younger children.  Heck even some entiely non violent shows that get the blood pumping will make sleeping more difficult.  This isn't exactly a point that can be debated to much...  Something more relaxing is more likely to get you to sleep sooner rather than later.  I don't know how you pulled them proclaiming that media needs to be less fun though, unless you somehow hold violence and fun as equivelent, which is definately incorrect.  The bottom line this all boils down to is context, and parents need to provide it.  They might need to answer some of lifes more difficult questions in the process, but overall I think that is what builds a good individual. 

 

 


Re: Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

Yes it can be fun as well as educational and have social value, just don't go ramming it through, and don't make those two things all it is.

And yes parents do need to provide context as wel las moniter what their kids are taking in and when.

Re: Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

This is kind of the standard line for child advocate types.  They would like to see children spend all their time holding hands and singing in a big ring.  To acknowledge that children are attracted to, indeed may need as part of their normal development, access to at least some darker themes, does not fit within this ideological agenda. 

In my experience articles published in the journal Pediatrics are particularly likely to beat this ideological drum.

Re: Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

Feh, they're teaching them all this nice stuff in a world that tends to be less so.

I'm not saying things shouldn't be educational and such, but, it tends to be less effective if the kids are bored.

Re: Study: Screen Time Keeping Preschoolers up at Night

I will give credit to the study for not singling out video games.  That being said, this is why we have parents. 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Has a video game ever made you so mad you broke the controller?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaTama31I think there are a significant number of jobs people will do for food that they will not do for an ipad.07/12/2014 - 8:39am
Infophilelabour (primarily among mothers and teens) and some show increased labour. Maybe it's a cultural thing in play that results in different outcomes in different societies.07/12/2014 - 6:53am
InfophileYou also need to take into account just how crappy it would be to only have the basics to live. But with competing forces at play like this, it's impossible to argue to an answer. We have to look to tests of it, and results are mixed. Some show decreased07/12/2014 - 6:51am
MechaTama31to be done, and some people really need jobs.07/11/2014 - 5:41pm
MechaTama31Info, I think you don't really understand just how crappy a lot of the jobs are that provide the "basics" that you assume will just continue to be produced under such a system. There's very little pride or prestige to be had from such jobs, but they need07/11/2014 - 5:40pm
Andrew EisenMaskedPixelante - That's probably because it's now available on the Wii U eShop for $8.07/11/2014 - 5:18pm
InfophileThat's not how human psychology works. It's all about "Keeping up with the Joneses." When everyone around you has a new fancy smartphone and is talking about that cool HBO series, do you want to be the one left out?07/11/2014 - 4:05pm
Matthew WilsonThe issue is most people would settle for the basics and not work. That is why we would need very heavy automation to make a system like that work. Almost all labor intensive tasks would have to be done by robot.07/11/2014 - 2:32pm
InfophileOf course, that's a gross oversimplification. The idea, have a basic safety net that pays for what's needed to live. If people can find a job and are willing to work, they get more money which can be spent on comfort and perks.07/11/2014 - 11:33am
InfophileIt's quite possible to get an economy to work with a basic minimum standard of living. You just need perks for the people who do work. Everyone gets food and a home. Everyone who works also gets an iPhone.07/11/2014 - 11:32am
MaskedPixelanteIn the continuing adventures of "Stuff I figured would be overpriced on eBay but isn't", 15 bucks for a copy of Mario and Luigi: Superstar Saga.07/11/2014 - 10:04am
SleakerI didn't gather the same conclusion.. Seems like they are focusing on devices & services still, just not calling it 'devices and services'07/11/2014 - 8:57am
PHX CorpMicrosoft CEO readies big shakeup, drops devices and services focus http://www.theverge.com/2014/7/10/5887143/satya-nadella-microsoft-ceo-employee-email07/11/2014 - 8:45am
MechaTama31declared that everybody should have them. Somebody still has to produce them.07/11/2014 - 7:44am
MechaTama31I do mean the developers/governmet. And money is not the only thing of value. I am including the food, housing, etc that everybody is supposed to get for free under this system. In the real world, those things don't exist merely because an authority has07/11/2014 - 7:43am
InfophileAs automation gets better and better, the number of jobs absolutely required keeps diminishing. How many people these days do you think are actually needed to keep everyone alive? Most people just make our lives more convenient and entertaining.07/11/2014 - 4:43am
Matthew Wilsonthat kind of system only works when most people (around 70 to 80 percent ) do not need to work.07/11/2014 - 1:21am
TechnogeekConjured up by who, though? If by the players, then it's not really "on a whim" since they're kind of putting work into it. If you mean the developers/government, then hello and welcome to monetary sovereignty.07/11/2014 - 12:34am
MechaTama31I'm just saying, when everything of value can be conjured up at a whim, that's not an economy. That's a fantasy.07/11/2014 - 12:15am
TechnogeekHonestly, though, what I find most thought-provoking about the article isn't the guaranteed minimum income aspect at all, but a more fundamental point: that we treat poverty as a moral failing on the individual, rather than a design flaw in the system.07/10/2014 - 11:53pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician