Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

July 16, 2011 -

We’re not going to point fingers but there are those who would attempt to protect children by banning violent video games.  Is that the best way?

Not according to Kansas State University professor Charles Smith.  He says, and you may want to sit down for this radical concept, that good parenting is a far better method than banning violent games.

I know, right?

"There is a mass hysteria about violence and video games, but it's the context and type of video game, and more importantly, it's the type of child,” said Smith, a professor of family studies and human services and parenting expert.

“Parents need to be aware and educated about the video games they are allowing their children to play. With a good parent-child relationship, most children can play a video game and will not become violent because of it.  A child without a connected parent relationship -- one who doesn't have respect for their parents and plays a violent video game over a certain length of time -- would worry me, but banning video games completely isn't the right answer either."

Smith warns that banning a game could be counterproductive as it may simply make the title more attractive to children. 

Still, while Smith says that violence in children’s media is not necessarily a bad thing, he is concerned with the ever improving technology driving violent games.

"The realism in video games is changing constantly because of technology.  This causes more realistic violence, and video games are becoming more and more immersive in terms of their nature."

Source: Kansas State University

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Contributing Editor Andrew Eisen


Comments

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

There is a huge difference between Kansas University and Kansas State University. He is, in fact a professor of Kansas State University.

-----------------------------------------

Managing Editor at TheBestGameSiteEver.com

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

Good eye.  Thanks much.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

Parent here too. This guy is spot on. Parents wanting govt regulation are lazy and likely shouldn't be parents.

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

No No No! This guy is out of his mind! Taking responsibility for our kids? How can he say such blasphemy? That's what the government's for: to raise our kids for us! Teaching them good morality ourselves? It's unconstitutional, I tell you! Seriously, though, I wanna hug this guy!

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

He looks very huggable.

- Left4Dead

Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

- Left4Dead Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

i couldn't agree more.

my dad would cut me off mid game of Duke3D or Quake 1 when i was 10yo and give me a lecture at times about the differance between reality and virtual reality.

so much is became pretty routine till i was 18 :)

i was never censored from anything (that was legal for me to see anyways) and my father would always have a chat about that sorta stuff from time to time just to make sure i knew right from wrong.

instead these days though it seems most parents are to "busy" to be around their kids, so they rely on consoles to distract the kids while they get some free time...

right... and thats not madeup, thats an actuall excuse i've seen and heard WAY to often. My father was called from work frequently during my childhood (seems i got into a lotta trouble for nothing.. funny thing was, it was usually just that,  nothing, refusing to do something and in a completely non-obstructive/violent manner... damned teachers were freaken pathetic)

but he MADE time to come to school and straighting out the mess, my mother as well. They were there when i needed them and not off galabanting in some club or ignoring me in the back yard as i've watched many kids end up with as i look around.

 

now i'm not saying ALL parents are that bad, but really, many are, and to many at that. Sure its harder to maintain a home and decent quality of living these days, but its not impossible on lower budgets, not even remotely. just get rid of the non-necessities (beer, pop, sweets, junk food, eating out, bar/club hopping) and get what ya need.. works for me, and when i do want something expensive.. well... its nice having the extra cash around :) course, given i can make a 2 litre of whiskey last me a year, and i don't care for beer.. that makes it easier. if bars/clubs are a must.. go with friends and con them into buying. i've NEVER paid for my drinks at a club/bar, always got a shipmate or officer to do it instead.

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

Parents would not agree haha. They want no one to even be able to make these games in order to protect their little perfect angel.

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

Let's try to be a little less general, shall we?

I'm a parent.  And I agree with him.  I want people to be able to make whatever games they want to.  And I want those game developers to be able to sell them.  I also want to be able to prevent my kid from playing them if I choose.

In other words, I want the status quo.  The industry can regulate itself and I can regulate my house.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

It's more so they don't have to think about it or wantign the politicians to do it all for them.

Re: Good Parenting More Effective Than Banning Violent Games

Common Sense - It does still exist.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician