UK Father Warns of the Deadly Combination of DVT and Video Games

August 1, 2011 -

A South Yorkshire man whose son died after playing video games for 12 hours straight due to complications with Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), is now campaigning to create a greater awareness about the condition and how it can be exacerbated with the excessive use of video games.

20-year-old Chris Staniforth died in May of this year after a marathon video gaming session turned deadly due to his DVT. Deep vein thrombosis (also commonly referred to as deep venous thrombosis or economy class syndrome) is the formation of a blood clot (called a "thrombus") in a deep vein. It is a form of thrombophlebitis (inflammation of a vein with clot formation).

Father David Staniforth thinks the condition may have been triggered by being immobile and playing games for 12 hours or more. David claims that his son would sometimes play online on his Xbox 360 for periods up to 12 hours.

The local coroner said a clot formed in Chris' left calf before moving to his lungs. This is typically one of the things that can occur with DVT. Once there, the clot can cause a fatal blockage, also called a pulmonary embolism.

While Chris's condition may have been exacerbated by playing games on Xbox Live, his father noted that it was not the activity that was the cause, but the long period of time spent doing it:

"After my research I saw there was no difference to Chris sitting at a desk on his Xbox and someone on a long-haul flight," David Staniforth said. "Sitting still is literally the danger zone. Chris loved to play and would stay up all night."

"Millions of people worldwide are playing these games for hours, and there is a risk," he added.

David Staniforth adds the he has no problem with playing games but he does want to warn parents and other DVT sufferers of the serious risk it poses. He plans to create a website for just that purpose.

We sincerely hope that, in helping make other people understand the risks associated with DVT and games, David Staniforth can find some much deserved comfort.

Source: BBC, Image via. Thanks to Andrew Eisen for the tip.


Comments

Re: UK Father Warns of the Deadly Combination of DVT and ...

again, notice how reading books and watching TV is not mentioned despite actually being in the same vein as videogames in this regard.

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: UK Father Warns of the Deadly Combination of DVT and ...

I read this one this morning. Notice how this entry doesn't mention anything about the DVT. According to this, he just dies from playing games too long (and doesn't say how long either). It says he WOULD play for up to 12 hours, but didn't say if that's what killed him. 

http://blog.games.yahoo.com/blog/866-xbox-addict-dies-from-blood-clot/

Re: UK Father Warns of the Deadly Combination of DVT and ...

"David Staniforth adds the he has no problem with playing games but he does want to warn parents and other DVT sufferers of the serious risk it poses. He plans to create a website for just that purpose."

This is quite sensible, and something the BBC's coverage of the story managed to include.

The Sun, on the other hand, left this part out in order to spew their usual moronic XBOX EVIL invective. I've given up on complaining about The Sun being frothing lunatics (par for the course, really), but to make this guy also look like a frothing lunatic in support of their sensationalist agenda, when he's really just trying to raise awareness and educate people, is kind of reprehensible.

Re: UK Father Warns of the Deadly Combination of DVT and ...

The Sun is owned by News Corp, just like News of the World and Fox News. Being a bunch of disiningenous sensationlists is how the entire company operates.

But, yes, the lesson of "stand up now and then" is one that too many people, admittedly myself included, need to remember.

Re: UK Father Warns of the Deadly Combination of DVT and ...

The Sun's frontpage headline for this was literally:

"DEATH BY XBOX"

...

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@info depends on the sector. for example, have you looked at how powerful unions are in the public sector? I will make the argument they have too much power in that sector.07/07/2015 - 12:39pm
InfophileIt's easy to worry about unions having too much power and causing harm. The odd thing is, why do people seem to worry about that more than the fact that business-owners can have too much power and do harm, particularly at a time when unions have no power?07/07/2015 - 12:31pm
Matthew Wilsonthe thing is unions earned their bad reputation in the US. the way unions oparate the better at your job you are, the likely you want to be in a union.07/07/2015 - 11:33am
InfophilePut that way, "right to work" seems to have BLEEP-all to do with gay rights. Thing is, union-negotiated contracts used to be one of the key ways to prevent employers from firing at will. Without union protection, nothing stops at-will firing.07/07/2015 - 11:06am
Infophilehas an incentive to pay dues if they're represented either way, so the union is starved for funds and dies, unless things are bad enough that people will pay dues anyway.07/07/2015 - 11:02am
InfophileFor those who don't know, "right to work" laws mean that it can't be a condition of an employment contract that you pay union dues. That is, the right to work without having to pay dues. Catch is, unions have to represent non-members as well, so no one...07/07/2015 - 11:01am
MechaCrashUnexpected? Seriously?07/07/2015 - 10:55am
Mattsworknamejob they wanted without the unions getting involved. The problem is, it has some unexpected side effects, like the ones Info mentioned07/07/2015 - 8:49am
MattsworknameThe problem being, right to work states exsist specificly as a counter to Unions, as the last 20 or so years have shown, the unions have been doing this countries economoy NO favors. The right to work states came into being to allow people to work any07/07/2015 - 8:49am
Infophile(cont'd) discriminatory. This can only be done for protected classes which are outlined in law (race, sex, religion, ethnicity everywhere, sexual orientation in some states). So, a gay person could be fired because they're gay and have no recourse there.07/07/2015 - 7:27am
Infophile@Goth: See here: http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/firedforbeinggay.asp for a good discussion on it. Basically, the problem is that in the US, most states allow at will firing, and it's the burden of the fired person to prove the firing was ...07/07/2015 - 7:25am
Goth_SkunkAssuming that's true, then that is a fight worth fighting for.07/07/2015 - 6:58am
Yuuri@ Goth_Skunk, in many states being gay is not a protected status akin to say race or religion. It's also in the "Right to work" states. Those are the states where one can be fired for any reason (provided it isn't a "protected" one.)07/07/2015 - 6:07am
Goth_Skunkregarded as a beacon of liberty and freedom that is the envy of the world, would not have across-the-board Human Rights laws that don't at the very least equal those of my own country.07/07/2015 - 5:47am
Goth_SkunkI find that hard to believe, Infophile. I have difficulty believing employers can *still* fire people for being gay. I would need to see some evidence that this is fact, because as a Canadian, I can't believe that the United States,07/07/2015 - 5:46am
InfophileFor that matter, even women don't yet have full legal equality with men. The US government still places limits on the positions women can serve in the military. And that's just the legal side of things - the "culture wars" are more than just laws.07/07/2015 - 5:43am
InfophileAnd that's just LGB issues. Get ready for an incoming battle on rights for trans* people. And then after that, a battle for poly people.07/07/2015 - 5:41am
InfophileA battle's been won. In many states employers can still fire people for being gay. And in many states, parents can force their children into reparative therapy to try to "fix" being gay. Those battles still need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:40am
Goth_Skunkand now they've switched to battles that don't need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:37am
Goth_SkunkIn my opinion, it was the final legal hurdle denying homosexual couples final and recognized statuses as eligible spouses. But even though this war's been won, some people are still too keen to keep fighting battles,07/07/2015 - 5:28am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician