Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

August 18, 2011 -

Ubisoft, faced with a groundswell of opposition to the copy protection in the PC version of Driver: San Francisco, has announced that the game will not require a constant connection to a server in order to play. Players will no longer be required to have a constant internet connection in order to play the game, but they will still need to sign in online at the game’s launch.

"We’ve heard your feedback regarding the permanent internet connection requirement for Driver and have made the decision to no longer include it," said a statement from Ubisoft on the matter. "So this means that Driver PC gamers will only need to sign in at game launch but can subsequently choose to play the game offline."

Hopefully this will be a lesson learned by Ubisoft about "always on" DRM schemes. Consumers do not like them and don't want them in their PC games. Driver San Francisco for Windows will be released September 30. The game will hit Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii on September 2.

Source: Develop

Posted in

Comments

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

As much as it might hurt to miss the next Assassin's Creed, well, I dunno if console sales count or not.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Pretty much agree with the rest of you. I will continue to ignore Ubi until they realize that they can have all the soapbox arguments they want regarding the securing of their product but in the end you just can't force your customers to buy it if they dont like the restrictive DRM wrapper around it.

Its really that simple Ubi... The customer is KING.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

This isn't relenting. You still need a constant internet connection to play. This is Ubisoft listening to gamers but totally not hearing them. Having to sign in everytime you launch the game is the same thing as requiring constant internet connection. The only difference is you don't get booted if your wireless goes down in the middle of gaming.

Ubisoft is pushing this hard and I think gamers are pushing back. I have not purchased and will not purchase an Ubisoft title as long as they have anything strong than a one time activation. They recently got caught out lying about their From Dust DRM on Steam as well, they said it only required a one time activation but you have to be logged into UPlay to play, meaning always on internet DRM.

I just can't wait for this company to go under. They are just the worst.

 

EDIT: I checked and their games are still getting cracked anyway. So what are you accomplishing Ubisoft? Tell me what you are accomplishing.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

This is not Ubi not listening to gamers. This is Ubi listening to gamers and doing the opposite. This (with the From Dust fiasco) is Ubi flat out lying to gamers.

This is my reason never to buy an Ubi Soft game ever again. They went too far this time.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Not good enough. They're giving only the most token of concessions while not grasping that if you're somewhere that you can't connect to the internet, you can't play this game. If you can't contact their servers because they're down, and this will happen at some point, you can't play your game.

Pirates, in the meantime, will be able to play the game with no problems at all. And I know this game is going to get pirated despite this bullshit DRM because I have actually paid attention for the past five years.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

On top of that, they said originally that From Dust would require a one-time internet activation, but as it turns out you have to be online to launch the game at all. Even if you're using the Steam copy, running Steam in offline mode, Ubisoft's DRM requires an internet connection.

Edit: Oh yeah, and they deleted their own forum post where they made that promise and replaced it with a new one, without any trace of apology.

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/08/18/ubisoft-edits-forum-keeps-fro...


---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Yup.

----
Papa Midnight

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
IvresseJust finished with Coxcon 2015 last night (convention in the UK organised by Youtube Jesse Cox). Was a damn good weekend meeting Jesse, Totalbiscuit, Dodger etc. and getting to ask them questions and stuff.08/03/2015 - 6:15am
InfophileReference for my comment earlier about Dan Aykroyd in the new Ghostbusters: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jul/15/ghostbusters-call-dan-aykroyd-for-cameo08/03/2015 - 6:00am
benohawkI hope the new ghostbusters is good regardless, but I also expect it to have to surpass the orignal for people to acknowledge that.08/03/2015 - 1:37am
benohawkMecha, those changes are also some of the bigger complaints I've heard about the Abrams Star Trek movie.08/03/2015 - 1:35am
MechaTama31https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU_D96AdK0M <-- Letterman interview with Bill Murray, he seems to have a similar opinion to mine about the pink-slime movie.08/02/2015 - 11:27pm
MechaTama31I don't think it's as big a deal as you think, matts. After all, JJ Abrams' Star Trek removed the original cast (mostly) and changed the formula significantly. If the movie is enjoyable, people will enjoy it.08/02/2015 - 11:23pm
MattsworknameDoc: Hope he recovers soon.08/02/2015 - 7:49pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.pcgamer.com/what-directx-12-means-for-gamers-and-developers/#page-1 by Peter Thoman, and better known by the name Durante. he talks about dx12 in detail08/02/2015 - 7:45pm
DocMelonheadIGF's Chairman resigns due to cancer: http://igf.com/2015/07/letter_from_the_chairman_so_lo.html08/02/2015 - 6:46pm
Matthew Wilsonit wont let me update it, so the title is Tifa's Breasts Too Big for the FF7 Remake?08/02/2015 - 6:14pm
Andrew EisenRemember, when linking videos, please tell us what it is (title usually words) in addition to who it's from.08/02/2015 - 6:05pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVv7pbqXvY a interesting video video by Gaijin Goombah08/02/2015 - 4:54pm
MattsworknameInfo: Well thats something at least08/02/2015 - 3:04pm
Infophile@Matt: Apparently Dan Aykroyd actually is involved. We don't know how yet, though, but he's apparently going to be in the movie in some way.08/02/2015 - 4:17am
MattsworknameI still hold that not having the origonal cast invovled in any way hurts this movie, and unless the 4 actresses in the lead roles can some how measure up to the comic timing of the origonal cast, i just don't see it being a success08/02/2015 - 12:46am
MattsworknameMecha: regardless of what you think of it, GB 2 was a finanical success and for it time did well with audiances ,even if it wasnt as popular as the first08/02/2015 - 12:45am
MechaTama31I think they're better off trying to do something different, than trying to be exactly the same and having every little difference held up as a shortcoming. Uncanny valley.08/01/2015 - 11:57pm
MechaTama31Having the original cast didn't do much for... that pink-slimed atrocity which we must never speak of.08/01/2015 - 11:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew: If the new ghostbusters bombs, I cant help but feel it'll be cause it removed the origonal cast and changed the formula to much08/01/2015 - 8:31pm
Andrew EisenNot the best look but that appears to be a PKE meter hanging from McCarthy's belt.08/01/2015 - 7:34pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician