Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

August 18, 2011 -

Ubisoft, faced with a groundswell of opposition to the copy protection in the PC version of Driver: San Francisco, has announced that the game will not require a constant connection to a server in order to play. Players will no longer be required to have a constant internet connection in order to play the game, but they will still need to sign in online at the game’s launch.

"We’ve heard your feedback regarding the permanent internet connection requirement for Driver and have made the decision to no longer include it," said a statement from Ubisoft on the matter. "So this means that Driver PC gamers will only need to sign in at game launch but can subsequently choose to play the game offline."

Hopefully this will be a lesson learned by Ubisoft about "always on" DRM schemes. Consumers do not like them and don't want them in their PC games. Driver San Francisco for Windows will be released September 30. The game will hit Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii on September 2.

Source: Develop

Posted in

Comments

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

As much as it might hurt to miss the next Assassin's Creed, well, I dunno if console sales count or not.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Pretty much agree with the rest of you. I will continue to ignore Ubi until they realize that they can have all the soapbox arguments they want regarding the securing of their product but in the end you just can't force your customers to buy it if they dont like the restrictive DRM wrapper around it.

Its really that simple Ubi... The customer is KING.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

This isn't relenting. You still need a constant internet connection to play. This is Ubisoft listening to gamers but totally not hearing them. Having to sign in everytime you launch the game is the same thing as requiring constant internet connection. The only difference is you don't get booted if your wireless goes down in the middle of gaming.

Ubisoft is pushing this hard and I think gamers are pushing back. I have not purchased and will not purchase an Ubisoft title as long as they have anything strong than a one time activation. They recently got caught out lying about their From Dust DRM on Steam as well, they said it only required a one time activation but you have to be logged into UPlay to play, meaning always on internet DRM.

I just can't wait for this company to go under. They are just the worst.

 

EDIT: I checked and their games are still getting cracked anyway. So what are you accomplishing Ubisoft? Tell me what you are accomplishing.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

This is not Ubi not listening to gamers. This is Ubi listening to gamers and doing the opposite. This (with the From Dust fiasco) is Ubi flat out lying to gamers.

This is my reason never to buy an Ubi Soft game ever again. They went too far this time.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Not good enough. They're giving only the most token of concessions while not grasping that if you're somewhere that you can't connect to the internet, you can't play this game. If you can't contact their servers because they're down, and this will happen at some point, you can't play your game.

Pirates, in the meantime, will be able to play the game with no problems at all. And I know this game is going to get pirated despite this bullshit DRM because I have actually paid attention for the past five years.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

On top of that, they said originally that From Dust would require a one-time internet activation, but as it turns out you have to be online to launch the game at all. Even if you're using the Steam copy, running Steam in offline mode, Ubisoft's DRM requires an internet connection.

Edit: Oh yeah, and they deleted their own forum post where they made that promise and replaced it with a new one, without any trace of apology.

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/08/18/ubisoft-edits-forum-keeps-fro...


---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Yup.

----
Papa Midnight

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaCrashI thought one of its other big issues was all the "quality" of phone games with all the portability of your television.01/27/2015 - 11:34pm
E. Zachary KnightApparently, people did not want a $100 console, they wanted a $200 one for a $100 price tag.01/27/2015 - 11:18pm
E. Zachary KnightI remember when people were demanding Ouya used the new and untested Tegra 4 processor rather than the tried and true Tegra 3, increase the RAM to 2Gigs and various other expensive addons.01/27/2015 - 11:17pm
ConsterCraig: perhaps I should've used the word "unreasonable", as in people clamoring for stretch goals that would guarantee they lose money on each deck.01/27/2015 - 10:04pm
Andrew EisenIt's my favorite movie. I'm looking forward to it as well.01/27/2015 - 9:16pm
Goth_SkunkI grew up idolizing Ghostbusters. I'm extremely excited to see another film.01/27/2015 - 8:52pm
Goth_SkunkEscapist -- via Hollywood reporter -- gives us a glimpse at the probable cast of the new Ghostbuster's movie: http://ow.ly/I3GyZ01/27/2015 - 8:51pm
Craig R.Nearly $4.2m in a week for Exploding Kittens. Can anything truly be unrealistic at this point?01/27/2015 - 8:50pm
prh99I am sure. Just have no interest in tropes in general or her take on gender portrayal.01/27/2015 - 7:44pm
Goth_SkunkI personally enjoy replacing letters with numbers in titles of movies and games. I think Firaxis missed out on a huge chuckle by calling it "Civilization V" and not "CiVilization."01/27/2015 - 7:20pm
Andrew EisenI bet I can guess how you voted!01/27/2015 - 7:02pm
prh99Never actually watched one, probably won't start.01/27/2015 - 6:15pm
E. Zachary KnightConster, when are unrealistic stretch goal demands anything new? They happen in every Kickstarter I have seen.01/27/2015 - 5:58pm
E. Zachary KnightAE: You forgot the "The video that conforms to my preconceived ideas about gender in games" option.01/27/2015 - 5:56pm
PHX Corp@Conster ok, randomly put 5 golden tickets into the boxes and anyone who gets a golden ticket gets to go and visit Willy Wonka's chocolate factory!, is a ultra-ridiculous stretch goal suggested by a backer01/27/2015 - 5:53pm
ConsterApparently they're unaware that unlike with video games, card games have a large constant factor in cost-per-unit.01/27/2015 - 5:24pm
ConsterIn other news, Exploding Kittens (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/elanlee/exploding-kittens) has over 100k backers now, a few of which are calling for unrealistic stretch goals.01/27/2015 - 5:23pm
ConsterIt's cool in Numb3rs, but not really anywhere else.01/27/2015 - 5:20pm
james_fudgeI hate that style of naming too01/27/2015 - 4:34pm
Wonderkarpits unattractive, andrew01/27/2015 - 3:46pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician