Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

August 23, 2011 -

According to two reports - one on Atari User and another on 8-Bit Rocket, lawyers representing Atari are taking aim at the retro Atari community. The most recent actions on Atari's part include sending a cease and desist letter to atari2600.org, a website that has been registered by Andrew Davie since 2000. For more than a decade Davie has used his site to highlight his non-commercial programming efforts for the classic Atari 2600 console.

Davie Told Atari User that he received a cease and desist letter signed by Atari's SVP & General Counsel, Kristen Keller. The letter demanded that Davie begin making arrangements to hand over his web site - atari2600.org - to them, claiming that the because the domain name contains the Atari brand ("Atari"), in its entirety, they have a legal right to it.

Davie says that he is "disappointed" with Atari's approach to the situation and is considering his position. Clearly, if Davie has owned and operated his web site for over ten years, Atari may have a hard time taking possession of it.

Atari also recently went after Starsoft Berlin, another hobbyist site that creates and promotes demos for the Atari platform.

While the Atari 8-bit enthusiast community doesn't know what Atari is up to with all these lawsuits, some are suggesting that the company is simply cleaning out the barn before bringing many of its classic franchises to new platforms such as mobile devices and social networks.

Thanks to Uncharted NES for the tip.


Comments

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

I hope he doesn't give in and really sticks it to these bastards

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

Once again we see that clueless executives and lawyers lashing out at their fans because they do not understand them.

This isn't about protecting a trademark or copyright. This is about a bunch of ignorant lawyers sending C&Ds to anyone who is using their marks without actually doing any research on them.

Of course, what can you really expect from a group of suits who have no clue about the history of the name they have branded themselves with. They do not know the history and are doomed to repeat the failures of previous suits who controlled the name.

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

That's what i'm thinking, some suit lawyer sees this as a cash grab. It's Nintendo V. Universal all over again.

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

First: No problem. Second: Anyone else find this ironic seeing how back then ANYONE could make a game for the 2600 community and sell it? Now if you will excuse me, I'm going to treat Atari to a giant shovel to help them with that hole they are digging foir themselves...

-------

"WARNING GUARANTEE: This post contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor suppress."

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

Not really seeing how this works since the 2600 is no longer being manufactured.

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

Atari In Name Only is not well liked by the 2600 community and this certainly won't help the company's reputation.  This move isn't likely animosity on Atari's part though.   The people running Atari probably don't know anything about the 2600 community.  Heck, the average fan of the Atari 2600 probably knows more about the history of the company than the people running it do.

It is a pity though.  These sites that have been targetted are run by folks outside the US who don't have the resources or capability to defend their (valid) claims so now the 2600 community loses a great resource like atari2600.org and Atari the company gains nothing except more hatred from the retro-gamers who should be their core fanbase. 

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

I can only describe this as a dick move. I'm not trying to be vulgar or anything of the sort, but it seems my vocabulary does not contain a better expression for Atari's actions.

---

I once had a dream about God. In it, he was looking down upon the planet and the havoc we recked and he said unto us, "Damn Kids get off my lawn!"

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

Companies are required to protect their trademarks, but you can see a clear problem here - there's no threat at all and the sites are _promoting_ Atari (at least their legacy software) more than anything.

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

Exactly, I don't get why, when you have such a small niche of retro gamers who want to promote your products, you would decide to go after them ten years later with a letter that says "you better hand over the keys to your site we've been receiving positive advertising from, or else we'll smack you with a legal stick"

 

I just don't get it.

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

Re: Atari Lawyers Take Aim at Retro Community Developers

I don't think the "protecting your trademark" argument could work here. The site existed since 2000 giving Atari plenty of time to take it down. It's not like it just cropped up recently.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
NeenekoAh, that old straw man. That is one of the ironies about the discussion, the whole point is showing how good people can still have problems with sexism and not realize it.09/17/2014 - 9:11pm
Andrew EisenYes, there have been a handful of op-eds suggesting that the term “gamer” has become tainted (two that I know of) but that’s the opinion of only a few. I've seen an equal number from those who disagree.09/17/2014 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenExcept, you haven't provided a single example of a site that’s actually calling gamers a "collective of Sexist White Bigoted Basement Dwelling Manchildren."09/17/2014 - 8:55pm
TechnogeekIf you want to make the stereotype of gamers less painful, try calling people out when they do bad shit rather than handwave it away as "not all gamers". Even if it is a few bad apples, that'll still more than enough to spoil the barrel.09/17/2014 - 8:53pm
quiknkoldI'm not going to Sell Gamergate anymore. It can sell itself. But I will sell the integrity of the Gamer. That we are still good people, who create and donate to charitys, Who engage with those around us and just want to have a good time.09/17/2014 - 7:35pm
quiknkoldpeople should not be harrassed and punished for the actions of a few. I've always welcomed and accepted everybody who wanted to join in. Who wanted to make them, or play them. I love good strong female protagonists, and want more.09/17/2014 - 7:35pm
quiknkoldOne of the tennants of Gamergate is to stand up against Harrassment. That Gamers arent like those assholes. We can argue for days if the Sexism or Antifeminism or corruption is there or not, But the one thing I believe in and wear on my sleave is that09/17/2014 - 7:35pm
quiknkoldBut there were these websites, attacking me and people like me, for the actions of a few. and then others joined in on Twitter and other places. there was a hashtag that said "explain in 4 words a gamer" and it made me sick.09/17/2014 - 7:35pm
quiknkoldManchildren who are awful people and that the Identity of the Gamer should die. This hurt me personally. I've always identified as a Gamer. Even in my childhood years, I was a Gamer. All my friends are Gamers. Its one of the core parts of my identity.09/17/2014 - 7:34pm
quiknkoldUltimately, With the whole Gamergate thing, I jumped on it due to the harassment. A small number of assholes harrass Anita and Zoe, and then all the publications lumped together Gamers as this collective of Sexist White Bigoted Basement Dwelling09/17/2014 - 7:34pm
quiknkoldEZacharyKnight : Lemme ask you a question. We have people who cling to walls, people who fire lasers from their eyes, people who can shapeshift....and yet fabric needs to be upheld to RL physics?09/17/2014 - 6:54pm
james_fudgebody paint?09/17/2014 - 5:33pm
E. Zachary Knightquiknkold, I stand corrected on the buttcrack thing. Still, I know of no fabric that actually does that.09/17/2014 - 5:05pm
Andrew EisenSo... it's unethical to discuss the ethics surrounding public interest vs. personal privacy?09/17/2014 - 4:45pm
prh99The source for the game was just released not long ago, it's at https://github.com/keendreams/keen09/17/2014 - 4:43pm
prh99An Indiegogo champagin bought the rights to the early 90's game Keen Dreams to make it open source and release it on GOG etc. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/let-s-get-keen-dreams-re-released-legally09/17/2014 - 4:42pm
james_fudgeAlso http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/17/Exposed-the-secret-mailing-list-of-the-gaming-journalism-elite09/17/2014 - 4:29pm
Andrew EisenI read the Kotaku story. Nowhere does it say anything close to "Gamers are white bigoted sexist losers." It's commenting specifically on the crap being slung at people discussing gender issues in games. So, what's the problem?09/17/2014 - 4:06pm
Andrew EisenYeah, I can imagine Spiderwoman posed like in your second link.09/17/2014 - 4:00pm
Andrew EisenThat's not the same pose. Spiderman (who is wearing an actual outfit rather than body paint) is crouched low to the ground. Kinda like a spider! Spiderwoman has her butt up in the air like she's waiting to be mounted.09/17/2014 - 3:59pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician