DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

August 31, 2011 -

Bloomberg reports that the U.S. Justice Department has filed a lawsuit to block AT&T Inc.’s proposed $39 billion acquisition of rival T-Mobile USA Inc. In its filing today in Federal Court the government said that the deal would "substantially lessen competition" in the wireless market. The government is seeking a declaration that AT&T’s takeover of T-Mobile (owned by Deutsche Telekom AG, or DTE), would violate U.S. antitrust law. The government also asked for a court order blocking implementation of the deal.

"AT&T’s elimination of T-Mobile as an independent, low- priced rival would remove a significant competitive force from the market," the government said in its filing.

"AT&T had not demonstrated that the proposed transaction promised any efficiencies that would be sufficient to outweigh the transaction’s substantial adverse impact on competition and consumers,” said the government in a statement. "AT&T could obtain substantially the same network enhancements that it claims will come from the transaction if it simply invested in its own network without eliminating a close competitor."

Naturally, analysts and supposed experts see this move differently. Bert Foer, head of the American Antitrust Institute in Washington, said that the DOJ has drawn a line in the sand with this move and that he didn't see any room to settle the case.

"If it could be settled, they would still be talking about it," Foer added.

"This isn’t just a negotiating strategy, this isn’t just a placeholder, they do mean to block it,” said Rebecca Arbogast, a Washington-based analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co. "There still is some room for negotiating a settlement, but the likelihood seems narrow."

Others disagree with that analysis - including David Balto, a Washington-based antitrust attorney; and New York University law professor Eleanor Fox.

David Balto thinks the lawsuit may be part of a negotiating strategy, adding that the government may have decided that "the best way to have strength in the settlement talks is to file a lawsuit."

"The important point is that the Justice Department has gone ahead and challenged a big merger of competitors, which it just hasn’t done," said Eleanor Fox, a law professor at New York University. "People were getting used to seeing press releases saying the Justice Department has agreed to merger XYZ with a spinoff."

AT&T said it was surprised by the government suit and that it would ask for an expedited hearing.

"We have met repeatedly with the Department of Justice and there was no indication from the DOJ that this action was being contemplated," Wayne Watts, AT&T’s general counsel, said in a statement to Bloomberg. The company plans to fight the litigation.

Bonn-based Deutsche Telekom said in an e-mailed statement to Bloomberg that it would also contest the U.S. government suit.

"[The] DOJ failed to acknowledge the robust competition in the U.S. wireless telecommunications industry and the tremendous efficiencies associated with the proposed transaction," a spokesperson for the company said.

Rejection by regulators would leave AT&T liable to pay Deutsche Telekom $3 billion in cash, to give T-Mobile USA wireless spectrum and to reduce charges for calls into AT&T’s network, a package valued at as much as $7 billion, Deutsche Telekom has said.

"Given the size of the cancelation fee that was negotiated into this agreement, AT&T has the incentive to fight,” said Andrew Gavil, a law professor at Washington-based Howard University. "The fact that the Justice Department is challenging the deal doesn’t mean they won’t negotiate a resolution at some point."

"Any way you look at this transaction, it is anticompetitive," Sharis Pozen, the acting head of the Justice Department’s antitrust division, said at a news conference.

Pozen said the department interviewed dozens of people and examined millions of documents before deciding that suing was the right path to take, but added that the department’s "door is open" to discuss a remedy with AT&T.


Comments

Re: DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

Is it bad when I read this I though ok who at DOJ wants a job as lead council for AT&T? I seriously doubt the DOJ has the citiznes best interest in this lawsuit and its just trying to get something out of the merger.

Re: DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

dunno why the FCC is still thinking about this even after the 'leaked document'.  damn, they're even more corporate-whipped than i thought when it takes the DoJ to step in.  Naturally, ATT will just keep throwing money at them until they go away.

Re: DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

I hope this works.  We left AT&T years ago because of their horrible service (both phone wise and people wise at the time) and have been quite happy with T-Mobile.  This merger would have been the SECOND TIME we had a different company phone and became AT&T via a "merger" (Cingular was good for us at the time...).  

Part of this I think has to do with AT&T's own lawyers posting damming documents online that proved that while AT&T used the argument for acquiring T-Mobile for $39 billion was in order to reach 97% of rural areas to expand their services but the document showed that AT&T knew the whole time they could do it, without takeovers, for just over $3 billion.   What was the other $36 billion for?...basically taking out another competitor and not doing anything to truly expand. 

I hope they deny the HELL out of this. :)

Zen aka Jeremy Powers
Editor and Host of the Zenspath Podcast (now on iTunes)
www.ZensPath.com
XBL: "PsychoticZen" PSN: "Zenspath"
Nintendo Network: "Psychoticzen", 3DS: "0860-3238-7260

Re: DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

Honestly, it would be a lot better for us if there were fewer regulations on cellular businesses. If it were easier to start a cellular company and expand your network, there would be far more competing businesses.

My wife and I tried one of the smaller cell companies, but their network was so spotty we couldn't use them. We love their prices and their plans, but when you can't use the phone at home or within a 2 mile radius of home, it is kind of pointless. So we ended up back with a major national cell company.

Right now, it takes billions of dollars to get bandwidth from the FCC. Only the largest businesses can get that. So the smaller companies are forced to lease that bandwidth from the mega corporations in order to even begin service.

The system is set up to help big businesses to stay big and keep real competition from springing up.

Re: DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

What's this? DOJ defending the little guy against corporate raping?

Jolly good. [/euro]

Re: DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

I know, its about time they did something like this.

Re: DOJ Files Lawsuit to Block AT&T T-Mobile Merger

You'd think they would have done this a long time ago.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you feel about Amazon buying Twitch?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
IanCBroke my EA boycott to pick up Plants vs Zombies Garden Warfare. Loving it. Still hate EA though. But i like Popcap. Gah.08/30/2014 - 6:01am
MaskedPixelantehttp://m.tickld.com/x/something-you-never-realized-about-guardians-of-the-galaxy Right in the feels.08/29/2014 - 6:56pm
AvalongodAgain I think we're conflating the issue of whether Sarkeesian's claims are beyond critique (no they're not) and whether its ever appropriate to use sexist language, let alone physical threats on a woman to intimidate her (no it isn't)08/29/2014 - 5:04pm
prh99Trolling her or trying to assail her integrity just draws more attention (Streisand effect?). Which is really not what the trolls want, so the only way to win (if there is a win to be had) is not to play/troll.08/29/2014 - 5:02pm
prh99Who cares, just don't watch the damn videos if you don't like her. Personally, I don't care as far as she is concerned as long there are interesting games to be played.08/29/2014 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenZip - And yet, you can't cite a single, solitary example. (And no one said you hated anyone. Along those lines, no one claimed Sarkeesian was perfect either.)08/29/2014 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenSaint's Row: Gat Out of Hell was just announced for PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One making it the 150th game For Everything But Wii U! Congratulations Deep Silver!08/29/2014 - 3:49pm
ZippyDSMleeI do not hate them jsut think its mostly hyperlobe.08/29/2014 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - I'd say that's likely. From my experience, most who have a problem with Sarkeesian's videos either want to hate them in the first place (for whatever reason) or honestly misunderstand what they're about and what they're saying.08/29/2014 - 3:16pm
james_fudgeWe appreciate your support :)08/29/2014 - 2:55pm
TechnogeekIt gives me hope that maybe, just maybe, the gaming community is not statistically indistinguishable from consisting entirely of people that your average Xbox Live caricature would look at and go "maybe you should tone it down a little bit".08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
TechnogeekI just want to say that while I've disagreed with the staff of this site on several occasions, it's still good to see that they're not automatically dismissing Anita's videos as a "misandrist scam" or whatever the preferred dismissive term is these days.08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightZippy, So you can't find even one?08/29/2014 - 1:04pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen:Right because shes prefect and never exaggerates... *rolls eyes*08/29/2014 - 12:53pm
SleakerAnd honestly, nearly all of the games she references, or images she depicts I've always cringed at and wondered why they were included in games to begin with, from pinups through explicit sexual depictions or direct abuse. I think it's cheap storytelling.08/29/2014 - 12:35pm
Sleaker@AE - aren't most people fundamentally misunderstanding her at this point? haha.. On a related note I think a lot of the backlash is coming from males that think she is telling them their 'Generic Male Fantasy' is bad and wrong.08/29/2014 - 12:33pm
Andrew EisenAnd no, I don't think the female community would be upset over the performance of a case study in and of itself. Possibly the mostivations behind such a study, the methodology or conclusions but not the mere idea of a case study.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
Andrew EisenAmusingly, these videos aren't saying you can't/shouldn't use tropes or that sexual representations are inherently problematic so those are very silly things to have a problem with and indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the series.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
SleakerDo you think the female community would get extremely angry over a male doing a case study on the negative impact of sex-novels and their unrealistic depiction of males and how widespread they are in american culture?08/29/2014 - 12:25pm
SleakerThe other thing that people might find problematic is that they see no problem with sexual representations of females (or males) in games. And realistically, why is there anything wrong with sexual representations in fiction?08/29/2014 - 12:24pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician