Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in Games, Life

August 31, 2011 -

According to a study that will be printed in the September issue of Psychological Science, breast-feeding moms are more aggressive than moms who use formula. You may be wondering why a study about breast feeding moms might matter to you, and the reason it does is because of what researchers used to test these aggression levels. The researchers' hypothesis was that mothers display a higher level of aggressiveness while breast feeding. This theory is rooted in previous research in non-human mammals that shows that lactation seems to trigger heightened defensive aggression because it apparently decreases an animal's fear response.

To test this theory researchers found 18 mothers who were nursing their children, 17 who were using formula, and 20 women who did not have kids. All of the participants were asked to play a video game against a research assistant who pretended to be an overly aggressive and competitive player. When a participant won a round of the competition, she was allowed to press a button that delivered a "punitive sound burst" to their opponent.

When all was said and done, researchers found that the breast-feeding mothers inflicted the loudest and longest punitive sound bursts on the research assistant than the other two groups. Mothers who breast-fed their infants were almost twice as aggressive as formula-feeding women and non-mothers, according to researchers. Formula-using moms and non-mothers were equal in their levels of aggression - which wasn't all that high, apparently. Oddly enough, researchers also found that while breast-feeding moms were highly aggressive as they played and won their compeititos, their blood pressure remained normal.

"Breast-feeding mothers aren't going to go out and get into bar fights," said UCLA's Dr. Jennifer Hahn-Holebrook, lead author of the study. "But if someone is threatening them or their infant, our research suggests they may be more likely to defend themselves in an aggressive manner."

The Hahn-Holebrook research, "Maternal Defense: Breast Feeding Increases Aggression by Reducing Stress" can be found in the September issue of Psychological Science. More details can be found here.

Source: io9

 


Comments

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

There might be "science" going on here but the scientists have clearly misunderstood the cause. The knowledge that a pregnant woman with a HEAVY kid in her uterus, straining her back and bladder, is more easily annoyed/aggravated by a loud noise should be obvious to anyone (ESPECIALLY men) who has ever been physically/verbally accosted by a pregnant woman just for getting in their way.

If there was ever a need for the axiom "causation does not equal correlation" this would be it.

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

If there was ever a need for the axiom "causation does not equal correlation" this would be it.

 

​Lactation does not equal aggravation?

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

You sir win the internets for today. yes

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

I thought psychology wasn't considered a real science?


Seriously... stop trying to prove this ridiculously specific causalities with a "science" who's sole purpose is a first order high level approximation of complex topics like human behaviour.

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

Since when is psychology not considered a 'real' science?

It is one of the more difficult and complex ones, but you can still apply the same scientific method to psychology as you can to other fields.

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

The field of psychology is one where they often fail to or neglect to prove causality, in fact much of the field, from the public perspective, doesn't care to show causality as it does simply trying to show correlation. I think the issue here is simply the nature of there work and until biology gives us a much clearer understanding of the brain this situation will remain.

ANY field whose goal is correlation over causality is not a real science; that is all this study, and many others like it, will ever hope to prove. There is no way to reasonably show causality for the complex human behaviors by simply assessing environment.


This doesn't mean that psychology has no place or value, I just think too many people, mostly psychologists, have long forgotten what that means.

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

I though the air-horn test was not considered a valid methodology?

Re: Research: Breast-Feeding Moms are Overly Aggressive in ...

My understanding also.

I can't say I'm surprised at the findings though.  Mother's are known to be fiercely protective of their young.  It makes sense that the hormones associated with breastfeeding would increase aggression.

===============

Chris Kimberley

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician