Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

September 7, 2011 -

Codemasters and AMD have confirmed that over three million digital vouchers for Steam have been stolen for DiRT 3. According to a report from Industry Gamers (citing a Steam forum post), hackers used an .htaccess exploit that allowed them to gain access to an .sql database containing the codes. Those codes were meant to be used for a future AMD graphics card promotion.

"This past weekend, activation keys associated with free DiRT 3 game vouchers shipping with select AMD products were compromised," said AMD in a statement. "These activation keys were hosted on a third party fulfillment agency website, www.AMD4u.com, and did not reside on AMD's website. Neither the AMD nor Codemasters servers were involved."

"We are working closely with Steam, Codemasters, and our fulfillment agency to address the situation. AMD will continue to honor all valid game vouchers, however the current situation may result in a short delay before the vouchers can be redeemed."

The good news is that the huge batch of codes that were stolen can be traced, and Codemasters claims that they should be able to deactivate the codes in due time.

Source: Eurogamer by way of Industry Gamers


Comments

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

Stolen? That's bit of a stretch given how the keys were made available for the whole world to see.

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

I disagree (though it's quite possible I've misunderstood exactly what happened here).  If someone takes my stuff without my permission, my stuff has been stolen.  It doesn't matter if I've left my front door wide open with my stuff neatly piled in the doorway.

That does make me stupid but it doesn't make my stuff any less stolen.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

Taking your stuff against your will is stealing, but you're using that logic on something that doesn't apply. Stealing leaves the victim without what is theirs. Has anyone lost anything? No, they still have the codes, but the hackers (sic) have them too, which they can invalidate. So they might be able to acquire copies of Dirt3 without participating in the promotion, but Codemasters will not have fewer copies of the game as a result. That is, if they are digital downloads and not printed discs shipped in boxes. It might be applicable to accuse them of fraud if they attempt to redeem those vouchers, but stealing isn't. What they did would be more akin to eavesdropping, espionage,  or wiretapping.

Your definition of stealing is flawed, especially in the eyes of the law. That said, what happened was a deplorable act that resulted in an interruption of service for actual customers of AMD and Codemasters. It was rather pointless act as well since it's easier to acquire the DRM-free version from bittorrent. Given all that, it's a seriously dick move and they should stand to answer for the damage they did.

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

Replace "stole" with "misappropriate" if it makes you happy.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

It's more like an infringement of privacy, similar to trespassing.

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

Whatever, buddy.  I know you understand the specifics of what happened so I really don't care what you call it.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

I believe this situation is more akin to leaving all of your stuff in the middle of a busy intersection and then claiming that it was stolen when you come back 3 days later to find it all missing.

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

Not unless those keys were posted in plain text on the front page of AMD4u's website or something similar.  Hell, even my "open front door" analogy isn't applicable.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

They were stored in plain text. All you basically had to do was add /keys to the end of the URL.

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

"Not unless those keys were posted in plain text on the front page of AMD4u's website or something similar."

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

I think it would be more apt to say you left your door unlocked. From an external perspective it would seem that your stuff was secure, but when more closely inspected the flaw is revealed.

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

That seem a fairer analogy. But then, on the internet, you'd have to account for thousands of people that keep trying the lock every day... You can argue it's good or bad, but it most definitely is common enough to take into account.

Re: Three Million DiRT 3 Game Vouchers Stolen by Hackers

.htaccess exploit? I'd hardly call it an exploit. Hell, I wouldn't even call it a hack. The directories (plural. There was more than one: an SQL directory showing some keys in 3 sql files, and a keys directory showing ALL keys in plain text files) were WIDE OPEN (and continued to be such for hours after it was made public). A hack? More like a complete lack of security.

----
Papa Midnight

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
TechnogeekYet, you're going to be hard-pressed to find anyone other than insecure 2EDGY4U teenagers seeing it as anything other than an extremely fun game.05/25/2015 - 8:36pm
TechnogeekSplatoon's probably the best example at this point. Gameplay-wise, it's a team-based third-person shooter with a significant online component. It's rated E10.05/25/2015 - 8:36pm
TechnogeekThe silliest thing about most of the Nintendo hatred is that they may be the last company that interprets "family-friendly" as meaning "fun for more than just the really young kids".05/25/2015 - 8:33pm
ZippyDSMleeWell it could be worse, like skyrim out of the box, a shame DAI dose not have that level of editing...05/25/2015 - 5:58pm
Zenpretty well without getting "nasty". Many people are disappointed in the decision and the about face on the status of the games development.05/25/2015 - 4:22pm
ZenEvery market has horrible people...but being like this towards all of them in a group is not a way to garner support and can make people more hostile towards you. Ironically his response was to someone that wanted to state a disagreement, but worded it05/25/2015 - 4:22pm
Goth_SkunkAs demonstrated by Ian's remarks, that 'market of possible fans' is apparently negligible.05/25/2015 - 4:18pm
Zeninformation while other versions had everything talked about openly.05/25/2015 - 4:15pm
ZenYeah, I've read through it and wanted to make sure I had it quoted correctly. I get there are issues, but this is horribly unprofessional and just burning a market of possible fans..many of which supported them and were waiting while getting little to no05/25/2015 - 4:15pm
Goth_SkunkOh wow. That's not even misquoted, he actually said that. Though for additional context in previous pages, he truly does not think highly of Nintendo console owners, and claims that in the industry, he's not alone.05/25/2015 - 4:12pm
ZenI also took a screenshot of the statement in case it is taken down (via my Twitter): https://twitter.com/zenspath/status/60293960536562483205/25/2015 - 4:05pm
ZenLink for my previous post - http://forum.projectcarsgame.com/showthread.php?27584-Project-Cars-Sales-figures&p=942776&viewfull=1#post94277605/25/2015 - 4:03pm
ZenProject Cars basically canceled for Wii U, Slightlymad Studios Head, Ian Bell, states "Yup, and if you need to pass this on, we really dislike Nintendo users" on Forum to Wii U players waiting for the game and disappointed in the news.05/25/2015 - 4:03pm
Goth_SkunkAnd now, a humorous gif. Oblivious Otter is Oblivious. http://i.imgur.com/zdUZOWo.gif05/25/2015 - 3:49pm
Goth_Skunka bonified game dev.05/25/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_SkunkGranted, most of that feedback is going to be vicious, but if a novice dev knows full well not to expect their hastily strewn together game as the next Grand Theft Auto, such curmudgeonly feedback shouldn't deter them from their ultimate goal of becoming05/25/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_SkunkAdditionally, Steam is a platform whereby these novice devs can showcase what they were able to put together and see what kind of feedback they can get from the community.05/25/2015 - 3:44pm
Goth_SkunkI don't think it's wrong for a novice dev to want to recover any losses from people willing to pay money for what they have produced, either. After all, every game dev had to start somewhere.05/25/2015 - 3:41pm
Goth_SkunkI disagree. I think that for novice developers, this tactic still at a fundamental level teaching someone the ins and outs of video game development.05/25/2015 - 3:41pm
PHX Corp@MW There are things that developers are doing that drive me up the Wall as a consumer, reused Unity assets is no Exception to said rule05/25/2015 - 2:17pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician