Free Press Files Lawsuit Against New Net Neutrality Rules

September 28, 2011 -

Here's a news story we saw coming. It seems that some of the biggest net neutrality advocates in the country have decided to file a lawsuit against the rules ratified by the Federal Communications Commission. When the FCC finally issued the finished version of it network neutrality rules and announced they would go into effect at the end of November, lawsuits against the policy where waiting in the wings such as those that were thrown out earlier in the year by Verizon and Metro PCS. But it looks like the biggest group in the country has beat both of those companies to court: activist group Free Press has filed a lawsuit asking a federal appeals court to review the FCC's rules saying that they are too weak. The group strongly objects to the exemption for wireless companies, who are allowed to do all kinds of things to consumers including throttling and data caps.

Free Press says that the "decision to adopt one set of rules for broadband access via mobile platforms and a different set of rules for broadband access via fixed platforms" is "arbitrary and capricious" and violates the law.

In a statement to Ars Technica Free Press Policy Director Matt Wood said, "Our challenge will show that there is no evidence in the record to justify this arbitrary distinction between wired and wireless Internet access. The disparity that the FCC's rules create is unjust and unjustified. And it's especially problematic because of the increasing popularity of wireless, along with its increasing importance for younger demographics and diverse populations who rely on mobile devices as their primary means for getting online."

"Free Press will fight in court to make these rules stronger," he added.

No doubt, the FCC will face more legal challenges from the other side of the issue.

Source: Ars Technica


Comments

Re: Free Press Files Lawsuit Against New Net Neutrality Rules

What cracks me up are the people who see net neutrality as "big government regulation", and therefore evil.  The ISPs have managed to spin it as the government trying to control people's access to the internet, when in fact, it is about the government trying to stop the ISPs from controlling people's access to the internet.  And when I say "cracks me up", I mean "makes me feel sad and a little ill".

Re: Free Press Files Lawsuit Against New Net Neutrality Rules

Unfortunately there is a lot of mythology around the power of the consumer and the magic hand of the free market fixing everything, so the idea that consumers do not need protection.

Re: Free Press Files Lawsuit Against New Net Neutrality Rules

A free market can never exit as those with power will always seek to control it.

The consumer dose have power however they squander it by ignoring the truth and becoming complacent to the ideals of the sheeple, "oh we can not change anything", "lets not take the time to find out who the person is we are voting for lets just vote for our parties choice," "let us continue".... but between the powers that be and modern media we are screwed as most people do not really care anymore.

 

/rant /lulz


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: Free Press Files Lawsuit Against New Net Neutrality Rules

whaddya expect? more than half of'em making these rules probably don't even know how a network works, let alone anything else.

they're just payed to make rules and ban things they don't like, or are told they shouldn't like.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenHeh, just had our (IGN's) journalistic integrity called into question over two typos on one of the Wikis (which are editable by the readers).07/01/2015 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilson@tech this isnt the only stupid tax in recent months though. they were adding a commuter tax as well. if they continue doing crap like this, they will run in to the same issues as Detroit.07/01/2015 - 5:34pm
TechnogeekI guess we can give Chicago credit for diversifying their portfolio of corruption, although they've still got a lot of work before they retake that crown from Louisiana.07/01/2015 - 5:29pm
TechnogeekEh, cities abusing taxation power for their own game isn't really a "Detroit" thing so much as a "corrupt small town" thing.07/01/2015 - 5:29pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/07/chicago-netflix-customers-your-bill-is-about-to-up-9-percent/ Chicago wants to become the new Detroit so be it.07/01/2015 - 4:58pm
InfophileAnd also, she said "anyone," but she also said "probably." This means there's a subset for whom the "you shouldn't write it" doesn't apply.07/01/2015 - 4:47pm
InfophileGoing back a bit: "As I believe there is no justification, there is no reason for me to continue reading." - One reason to read might be to find out if you're wrong about there being no justification for it.07/01/2015 - 4:45pm
Andrew EisenRead it here: http://www.zenofdesign.com/getting-diversity-to-speak/07/01/2015 - 4:42pm
Andrew EisenFormer Bioware dev, Damion Schubert, offers an interesting thought on diversity in the industry. Not only is it important to have, it's important to make sure they feel comfortable offering their perspective.07/01/2015 - 4:40pm
Andrew EisenHeh, I did consider it!07/01/2015 - 4:37pm
Craig R.Aww, video gamer players wasn't an option for the poll?07/01/2015 - 4:33pm
KaylaKazeI think the problem here is certain people don't know what "shouldn't" means, even after it's been explained to them half a dozen times.07/01/2015 - 4:19pm
Andrew EisenWhat if creators heard our feedback, agreed with it and then... oh god... made a better show? The HORROR!!!07/01/2015 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenI mean, next thing you know they'll make a YouTube video. A YOUTUBE VIDEO!!!07/01/2015 - 4:07pm
Andrew EisenHow DARE anyone write an opinion suggesting that people who suck at something might consider a better way to accomplish the same thing or improve so they suck less. The NERVE!07/01/2015 - 4:06pm
Goth_SkunkYes, but we complain about it amongst ourselves, we shake our heads, we sigh, shrug our shoulders and say 'oh well, what can you do?' We don't write articles for Wired and say 'Anyone can write about X, but should they? Probably not.'07/01/2015 - 3:57pm
Andrew EisenMy favorite is: "Zoom and enhance!"07/01/2015 - 3:55pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, you must not hang out with many technology experts. We complain about bad portrayals of tech all the time.07/01/2015 - 3:52pm
Andrew EisenPeople should be free to write about anything their little hearts desire. Even if they suck at it. Maybe not the most advisable thing to do, depending on their personal goals. But that's why you listen and learn and improve! Or try to, anyway.07/01/2015 - 3:50pm
Andrew EisenAnd you're straying from the path a bit but the sentiment in and of itself I agree with.07/01/2015 - 3:47pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician