GameStop: We Have an Advantage over OnLive, Gaikai

September 28, 2011 -

In a quick-and-dirty interview with IndustryGamers, GameStop President Tony Bartel confidently proclaims that the world's largest games retailer has a huge advantage over streaming game services such as OnLive and Gaikai. When asked the question "How do you see cloud gaming evolving as a business model?," Bartel responds by saying that their advantage is knowledge of what customers are buying in advance:

"I think you’re going to see a lot of models being tested. I think you’re going to see people trying to sell full games for streaming in the cloud. I think you’re going to see people having monthly subscription models to pay for gaming in the cloud. I think you’re going to have people put together a micro-rental model where you have 'X' dollars per hour to play these games. But at this point the only one of those that has truly been tested is the DLC model.

We have an advantage over our competition because we know who has reserved a game for the big launches."

Bartel goes on to say that one of the highest growth categories - according to his company's research and knowledge in the space - is downloadable content for games:

"Based on market research that we’ve done, we believe one of the highest growth categories in all of digital is the sale of DLC. You still have a $50 billion console industry out there, and now you have this great DLC market where you have downloaded content directly to the console. And these gamers are used to paying for games. Rather than look to conjecture about the future, I would start with let’s talk about what’s working today, and that definitely is working. We see that growing from a $3 billion global category today to a $6.4 billion category by 2014. That’s a 24% per annum growth rate."

You can read the entire thing here - assuming that you are interested in what the future of cloud-based gaming might look like from GameStop's perspective.


Comments

Re: GameStop: We Have an Advantage over OnLive, Gaikai

Am I missing something in Gamestops claims here? Their advantage is "knowledge of what customers are buying in advance"? OK this is an important bit of info in a brick and mortar direct retail business where you must purchase and control inventory. I get that. But how exactly does that equate to an advantage in a digital streaming or direct download environment? It's not like On Live has to worry about how many boxes to buy ahead of time. They upload the game and then meter how many people choose to play or purchase it. y/n? It's not like there is any reason or advantage to preorders in streaming.

Re: GameStop: We Have an Advantage over OnLive, Gaikai

i still don't see the point in buying a lot of that DLC.

especially map packs, they seperate the community and often can't even be used in normal games, but rather a whole new playlist need be added just to play them. Or the player ends up with merely half the possible games to play in due to having the DLC as opposed to not.

unless its something merely cosmetic (such as GoW3's stupid gun skins people are openly wasting money on) or for Single player/co op content, the purchase of DLC is pretty meaningless IMO for the above reasons. Making it harder to find a host, or being booted from a game for missing a map is not fun, but neither is buying the DLC and finding it nearly useless (i've seen maybe 2 of the DLC maps from MW2 after i grabbed them on sale from steam... yay, and at that i've seen them maybe 3 times in nearly a year)

no more DLC for me thank you.

as for cloud stuff... the way STEAM does it, saves only, works fine for me. but cloud running the ENTIRE game... i'll pass. Onlive's weak system, bad resolutions, and low quality in general was enough of a turn off. I really can't believe people pay full price for a game on that service and only have access to it in part, if at all, and only in such horrid quality.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaCrashI just hope they realize that part of the problem with the Wii U was its relative lack of power. You can still make good games with what the Wii U has, but third parties won't want to deal with it when they can target the more popular PS4/XB1.07/02/2015 - 10:59am
Andrew EisenReplace "NX" with "QOL" and I'd buy it as potentially true.07/02/2015 - 10:51am
Andrew EisenNintendo to start manufacturing NX in October to target a July 2016 launch with 20 million consoles shipped the first year. Sure... http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20150702PD204.html07/02/2015 - 10:47am
james_fudgeLet's avoid name calling in the shoutbox07/02/2015 - 8:55am
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician