GameStop: We Have an Advantage over OnLive, Gaikai

September 28, 2011 -

In a quick-and-dirty interview with IndustryGamers, GameStop President Tony Bartel confidently proclaims that the world's largest games retailer has a huge advantage over streaming game services such as OnLive and Gaikai. When asked the question "How do you see cloud gaming evolving as a business model?," Bartel responds by saying that their advantage is knowledge of what customers are buying in advance:

"I think you’re going to see a lot of models being tested. I think you’re going to see people trying to sell full games for streaming in the cloud. I think you’re going to see people having monthly subscription models to pay for gaming in the cloud. I think you’re going to have people put together a micro-rental model where you have 'X' dollars per hour to play these games. But at this point the only one of those that has truly been tested is the DLC model.

We have an advantage over our competition because we know who has reserved a game for the big launches."

Bartel goes on to say that one of the highest growth categories - according to his company's research and knowledge in the space - is downloadable content for games:

"Based on market research that we’ve done, we believe one of the highest growth categories in all of digital is the sale of DLC. You still have a $50 billion console industry out there, and now you have this great DLC market where you have downloaded content directly to the console. And these gamers are used to paying for games. Rather than look to conjecture about the future, I would start with let’s talk about what’s working today, and that definitely is working. We see that growing from a $3 billion global category today to a $6.4 billion category by 2014. That’s a 24% per annum growth rate."

You can read the entire thing here - assuming that you are interested in what the future of cloud-based gaming might look like from GameStop's perspective.


Comments

Re: GameStop: We Have an Advantage over OnLive, Gaikai

Am I missing something in Gamestops claims here? Their advantage is "knowledge of what customers are buying in advance"? OK this is an important bit of info in a brick and mortar direct retail business where you must purchase and control inventory. I get that. But how exactly does that equate to an advantage in a digital streaming or direct download environment? It's not like On Live has to worry about how many boxes to buy ahead of time. They upload the game and then meter how many people choose to play or purchase it. y/n? It's not like there is any reason or advantage to preorders in streaming.

Re: GameStop: We Have an Advantage over OnLive, Gaikai

i still don't see the point in buying a lot of that DLC.

especially map packs, they seperate the community and often can't even be used in normal games, but rather a whole new playlist need be added just to play them. Or the player ends up with merely half the possible games to play in due to having the DLC as opposed to not.

unless its something merely cosmetic (such as GoW3's stupid gun skins people are openly wasting money on) or for Single player/co op content, the purchase of DLC is pretty meaningless IMO for the above reasons. Making it harder to find a host, or being booted from a game for missing a map is not fun, but neither is buying the DLC and finding it nearly useless (i've seen maybe 2 of the DLC maps from MW2 after i grabbed them on sale from steam... yay, and at that i've seen them maybe 3 times in nearly a year)

no more DLC for me thank you.

as for cloud stuff... the way STEAM does it, saves only, works fine for me. but cloud running the ENTIRE game... i'll pass. Onlive's weak system, bad resolutions, and low quality in general was enough of a turn off. I really can't believe people pay full price for a game on that service and only have access to it in part, if at all, and only in such horrid quality.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician