PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

October 3, 2011 -

Sony will be rolling out its PSN Pass for the multiplayer aspects of its upcoming game Uncharted 3. As it did earlier this year with Resistance 3, Sony will implement a "PSN Pass" code on Uncharted 3. This means that when you buy a copy of the game brand new at retail it will come with a special code specifically for multiplayer that you will have to activate the first time you play online. Should you sell the game the next person that buys it will have to turn around and pay $10 to get access to multiplayer.

Online pass schemes are proving to be popular among publishers such as Electronic Arts, THQ and others, as a way to squeeze money from used games sales. Sadly these Online Pass systems only squeeze the money out of consumers- many of whom bought the game used because they either wanted to save some money or couldn't afford a brand new copy of the game...

The confirmation on the Uncharted 3 Online Pass comes from Juan Jimenez, Software Manager of Sony Spain. He confirmed the new in this interview.

Source: Kotaku


Comments

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

Et tu, Sony?

This has gotten out of hand. Developers need to stop punishing the consumers simply because they want to make money on the same game twice.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

correction, publishers.

the publishers are the ones that get to make these decisions not the developers. More oft that not the developers are on a tight leash that forbids them from saying what they truly feel about this sort of thing, and end up given bad credit because they were told to say only good things.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

Right, my bad. Wrong term. I need to stop posting on sleep deprivation. -.-

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

I chose not to buy Homefront because of this stuff, so they lost me. I have to agree with Jim Sterling on this subject.

-----------------------------------------

Managing Editor at TheBestGameSiteEver.com

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

"Sadly these Online Pass systems only squeeze the money out of consumers- many of whom bought the game used because they either wanted to save some money or couldn't afford a brand new copy of the game..."

Wow, this is quite the agenda laden statement from GP. I wholeheartedly disagree, and you can still play the game single player used, so you pay less, and get less game. This seems like a pretty fair way for the company to generate revenue from used game sales, and doesn't infringe on consumer rights. It's too bad you cant sell your passcode to the new owner once it's been used, but seriously, the game does not become worthless without multiplayer.

Any way we can keep the snarky asides to JT articles?

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

"so you pay less, and get less game"

Man, wouldn't the RIAA have loved this?

You sell a CD used, the next buyer randomly can't play one of the tracks simply because a record company decided it should be that way.

Whether you buy new or used, you rightfully have the expectation of buying a *complete* game. Not one where some functionality may be disabled because you bought it used.

And, yes, this is 2011: multiplayer is expected, not an exception.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

It's too bad you cant sell your passcode to the new owner once it's been used,

It used to be that way. But rather than having to transfer some activation code, it was just built into the games.

There are other ways to make money off of buyers of used games that do not require stripping out content that used to come with it. Traditional DLC is one way.

I still think these online codes are a bad idea and I don't believe for a second that they are making any serious money off of them.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknamePS: hudson played winston zedimore08/03/2015 - 7:24am
Mattsworknameinfo: the orignoal cast wasn't part of Star trek, but the charecters in the movie were the same charecters. Ghostbusters with out stance, ego, venkman, and Earnie hudsons charecter, whose name I forget for some reason , feels wrong to me08/03/2015 - 7:23am
PHX Corphttp://www.nintendolife.com/news/2015/08/scathing_nikkei_report_hints_at_shameful_treatment_of_staff_by_dictatorial_konami_management Scathing Nikkei Report Hints At Shameful Treatment Of Staff By Dictatorial Konami Management08/03/2015 - 7:15am
IvresseJust finished with Coxcon 2015 last night (convention in the UK organised by Youtube Jesse Cox). Was a damn good weekend meeting Jesse, Totalbiscuit, Dodger etc. and getting to ask them questions and stuff.08/03/2015 - 6:15am
InfophileReference for my comment earlier about Dan Aykroyd in the new Ghostbusters: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jul/15/ghostbusters-call-dan-aykroyd-for-cameo08/03/2015 - 6:00am
benohawkI hope the new ghostbusters is good regardless, but I also expect it to have to surpass the orignal for people to acknowledge that.08/03/2015 - 1:37am
benohawkMecha, those changes are also some of the bigger complaints I've heard about the Abrams Star Trek movie.08/03/2015 - 1:35am
MechaTama31https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU_D96AdK0M <-- Letterman interview with Bill Murray, he seems to have a similar opinion to mine about the pink-slime movie.08/02/2015 - 11:27pm
MechaTama31I don't think it's as big a deal as you think, matts. After all, JJ Abrams' Star Trek removed the original cast (mostly) and changed the formula significantly. If the movie is enjoyable, people will enjoy it.08/02/2015 - 11:23pm
MattsworknameDoc: Hope he recovers soon.08/02/2015 - 7:49pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.pcgamer.com/what-directx-12-means-for-gamers-and-developers/#page-1 by Peter Thoman, and better known by the name Durante. he talks about dx12 in detail08/02/2015 - 7:45pm
DocMelonheadIGF's Chairman resigns due to cancer: http://igf.com/2015/07/letter_from_the_chairman_so_lo.html08/02/2015 - 6:46pm
Matthew Wilsonit wont let me update it, so the title is Tifa's Breasts Too Big for the FF7 Remake?08/02/2015 - 6:14pm
Andrew EisenRemember, when linking videos, please tell us what it is (title usually words) in addition to who it's from.08/02/2015 - 6:05pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVv7pbqXvY a interesting video video by Gaijin Goombah08/02/2015 - 4:54pm
MattsworknameInfo: Well thats something at least08/02/2015 - 3:04pm
Infophile@Matt: Apparently Dan Aykroyd actually is involved. We don't know how yet, though, but he's apparently going to be in the movie in some way.08/02/2015 - 4:17am
MattsworknameI still hold that not having the origonal cast invovled in any way hurts this movie, and unless the 4 actresses in the lead roles can some how measure up to the comic timing of the origonal cast, i just don't see it being a success08/02/2015 - 12:46am
MattsworknameMecha: regardless of what you think of it, GB 2 was a finanical success and for it time did well with audiances ,even if it wasnt as popular as the first08/02/2015 - 12:45am
MechaTama31I think they're better off trying to do something different, than trying to be exactly the same and having every little difference held up as a shortcoming. Uncanny valley.08/01/2015 - 11:57pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician