Lawmakers Offer Alternative to SOPA, Protect IP

December 2, 2011 -

While some in the U.S. House and Senate would love to jam SOPA and Protect IP through the legislative process, a bipartisan group of lawmakers have drafted an alternative proposal that would make use of existing trade laws and the International Trade Commission to deal with counterfeit goods, piracy and the "rogue web sites" that deal in those things explicitly. A bipartisan group of lawmakers is circulating a proposal that would use trade laws to battle online piracy as an alternative to the controversial bills currently pending in both chambers of Congress.

The draft was co-authored by Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) as well as Reps. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) and John Campbell (R-Calif.). The alternate plan would authorize the International Trade Commission to investigate and issue cease-and-desist orders against foreign websites that provide copyrighted software illegally or sell counterfeit products. The distinction being that the ITC would have to find that the site being complained about is "primarily" and "willfully" engaged in infringement in order to issue the order.

Once  a court order is issued payment providers and online advertising services would be compelled to halt providing services to the offending web site. The approach, say its authors, conforms to current copyright law and uses the "follow the money" approach put forward by Google and other tech companies who opposed OSPA and Protect IP's approach.

The draft also has provisions to give companies that comply with court orders immunity from any possible legal actions. The lawmakers say they plan to make a draft of their legislation public to solicit feedback before formally introducing it in the House and Senate.

The MPAA and other big media trade groups can no longer claim that there is no alternative to SOPA or Protect IP anymore.

Source: The Hill


Comments

Re: Lawmakers Offer Alternative to SOPA, Protect IP

I'm gonna have to get a look at this draft. I like what they propose, and it's a big improvement compared to SOPA. However, i will withhold judgement until I actually read the bill.

Re: Lawmakers Offer Alternative to SOPA, Protect IP

"The lawmakers say they plan to make a draft of their legislation public to solicit feedback before formally introducing it in the House and Senate."

We'll be waiting.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Lawmakers Offer Alternative to SOPA, Protect IP

The problem remains: will SOPA and/or PROTECT-IP get passed before this alternative has a chance to get off the ground?

Re: Lawmakers Offer Alternative to SOPA, Protect IP

Hopefully they'll be quick about it. If not, there's always a chance to repeal SOPA/PROTECT IP, if this miracle legislation can prove to be a better option.

Re: Lawmakers Offer Alternative to SOPA, Protect IP

At the very least, it'll steal the thunder away from SOPA/Protect IP.  The politicians who are backing this bill may be only doing so halfheartedly.  Deep down they know it's flawed, but until now they didn't see an alternative.  Now there is one.  And if it's crafted by one of their own rather than a bunch of corporate entities, chances are they'll throw their support behind it instead.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
MattsworknameDitto kotaku, Gawker, VOX, Polygon, ETC07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MechaTama31So, between pulling a game from one chain of stores, and forcing editorial changes to a media source, only one of them strikes you as being on the edge of censorship, and it's the game one?07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Andrew EisenHave gamers ever tried to ban a product? Can you be more specific? I'm not clear what you're getting at.07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Mattsworknamethey should have expected some kind of blow back. But I didn't participate in that specific action07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MattsworknameAndrew Youd have to ask others about that, I actualyl didn't have much beef with them till last year, so I can't speak to there history. I simply feel that gamesutra chose politics over gaming and chose to make enimies of it's prime audiance. For that,07/28/2015 - 8:40pm
Andrew EisenI'm still not clear on how Gamasutra was lacking in accountability or what it was lacking in accountability for.07/28/2015 - 8:38pm
MattsworknameAndrew: You and I agree on most of that. I don't diagree that there should ahve been other actions taken. Now, I do want to point something out, casue Im not sure if it's happened. Have gamers ever tried to have a product banned?07/28/2015 - 8:37pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician