Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

December 7, 2011 -

Many gamers hate DRMs as an unneeded cumbersome burden on gamers that legitimately purchase software. However, Croteam, the makers of the Serious Sam franchise, have managed to protect those gamers and make the life of pirates who don't buy the game miserable. 

According to a post at Dark Side of Gaming, pirates that violate the DRM will find their characters in game being shadowed by a huge red scorpion that just won't die. It will follow the player until he is dead and keep doing it as long as the game is pirated.

While the implementation is nothing short of brilliant, I wonder how many will be tempted to pirate the game just to see this armored monstrosity in action?

(Image courtesy of Rock, Paper Shotgun)

Posted in

Comments

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

I want a mod that bring this into the real game as a nigh impossible, yet destroyable, enemy...

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

Not sure what the scale is of the screenshot (never having played Serious Sam before) but that looks like a pretty big scorpion...

On another note, I'm still a fan of old school Blizzard Product Key Checks.

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

The enemies in the Serious Sam series can literally be the size of skyscrapers, or bigger

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

It'd be a brilliant twist on having a game demo for something like Serious Sam. You can play for about 15 minutes and then you die by an unbeatable enemy that prompts you to buy the full game.

 

They should put it into the main game as a super-boss or something. Still all-powerful but "vulnerable" at least.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

Even if people pirate it just to see the big bug in action it's great advertising. They get people to try maybe 10 or 15 minutes of the game before Scorpio gets finally hunts them down all without paying for sever storage or bandwidth. Good deal. In fact, I would even delay the scorpion attack until 10 or 15 minutes of the game so people can see what the game is like legit.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

I'd delay it more than that even. Let them get through a nice chunk of the game before putting the screws on them. It seemed to work out for Arkham Asylum. If you pirated that one, every time you tried to use your cape, Batman would fail around like he was having a seizure and make it impossible to glide. You could get a good halfway into the game before you reached a section that couldn't be handled with the line launcher or batclaw and then be left clinging to life on a tiny rock halfway out into the bay with no way to proceed except buy the game.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

I like this kind of DRM. Sure people may find a way to get around it, but that will take time and not everyone that pirates games will have the patience for it. It is still better than some kinds of DRM systems out there. And its kinda funny.

This one actually reminds me of a game i use to play called Escape Velocity. In the game there was a character named Captain Hector. If you had yet to register the game he would regularly Warp into the system you were in and causally recommend that you register your game. However if you pirated the game, he would give you a few days of the usual reminder before going crazy and becoming hostile. He was so powerful would blow you away in a matter of seconds, and if you Jumped systems he would follow.

Good times.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

So `hector' would hector you into registering the game? LOL! That does sound like fun.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

Much like every other DRM scheme, pirates will get around it within days, and somehow it will come back to bite legitimate buyers.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

Of course. Instead of investing time and resources into making the game worth paying for they invest time and resources into implimenting useless DRM that will be cracked within a week of the game coming out or in the case of SecuRom games before the game is even in stores. Keep fighting those evil pirates game companies. They sure do enjoy laughing at your futile efforts.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

It doesn't matter if a game is worth paying for or not - people will still take stuff that isn't theirs.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

"While the implementation is nothing short of brilliant"

 

It's been done before.

Re: Croteam Slaps Serious Sam 3 Pirates With Unkillable Foe

I wanna see this in action.. but not sure if i will pirate it. gatta love a great way to counter pirates ;)

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician