RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

December 19, 2011 -

It must be tough to push hard for bills like the Stop Online Piracy Act and Protect IP when your employees or members are downloading illegal files. According to a report on TorrentFreak, someone from both Homeland Security and the RIAA (the trade group that represents the music industry) have been downloading popular music. The IP addresses associated with these groups were unearthed on YouHaveDownloaded.com, a site that databases the IP's and downloads of Torrent users. Since this data base is searchable, all you need to know is the IP range of a target to figure out - in general - who is downloading from what IP address.

Last week TorrentFreak revealed that there are BitTorrent pirates at Sony, Universal, Fox, and someone in the palace of French President Nicholas Sarkozy, and today we learn that RIAA and the Department of Homeland Security are part of the list too. TorrentFreak found that 6 unique addresses from where copyrighted material was shared. Aside from recent albums from Jay-Z and Kanye West, RIAA staff also pirated the first five seasons of Dexter, an episode of Law and Order SVU, and a pirated audio converter and MP3 tagger. Tisk, tisk.

While Homeland Security plays a part in seizing domains of sites that allegedly traffic in ill-gotten or fake goods, it also takes some time out for some illegal file downloads. TorrentFreak found more than 900 unique IP-addresses at the Government organization through which copyrighted files were downloaded.

Pretty astonishing stuff. I wonder if either organization will have anything to say about this.

Thanks to Andrew D. Nystrom for the tip via Twitter.

Image provided by Shutterstock. All rights reserved.


Comments

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

now after this was found, the RIAA is failing google on "report card" of their anti-piracy efforts http://76.74.24.142/423B769B-66EE-B137-CDED-F44741C19E6B.pdf

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

Irony strikes again.

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

Though this is a delicious piece of information, I can't help but get the impression that no one in power actually cares about the RIAA breaking their own rules.  This isn't the first time this has happened to them, after all.

Besides, doesn't youhavedownloaded.com have a disclaimer in the bottom corner that basically says it's a joke website...?

-------------------------

Treat me nice, or you may end up in my next novel.

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

As much as I dislike the RIAA, I'll give them the benefit of a doubt that the IP doesn't prove conclusively that someone in their employ downloaded those items any more than they can prove that I downloaded X on my IP, which is to say not at all. Being technologically ignorant as they are, someone probably hacked their WiFi and used their IP to download these items.

Man, considering this is the RIAA, that sounds way too plausible...

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

I see a ton of false arrests in the future.

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

And yet the potential irony, along with the potential hypocrisy of the situation, can't be missed.

RIAA employee(s) being sued/arrested for having been "caught" downloading because the IP address and their presence in the location where that IP address is used, at the time the download took place, even though that individual, or even the computers at that IP address, were never actually used to download the material, and such circumstantial evidence is used by the prosecution to attempt to convict that  individual.

RIAA's response:  "But, but, but..."

Or

It's actually proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that a/an employee(s) DID actually download such material illegally.

RIAA's response:  "But, but, but..."

 

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

Oh, this is Hollywood quality material.

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

I'm entirely unimpressed.  Not that they were pirating, but that they pirated such painfully obvious crap.  Five seasons of Dexter?  The new Kanye album?  Sheesh.

Everybody knows that real pirates are interested in stuff they can't actually find in stores: old David Bowie albums, for instance, or classic games like System Shock 2.  That is, uh, hypothetically.  I wouldn't dream of downloading the new episode of Flyers-Rangers 24/7, no sir!

---
Fangamer

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

That kinda goes with a notion I'd been having. Publishers know little of art and care little for art unless it's making them money, usually meaning that once the publisher is done with a product, weather the artist likes it or not, they would prefer it vanish off the face of the earth for good so people are forced to buy new, rather than future generations be able to enjoy it.

I have copies of games I'd found in thrift stores that I can't get anywhere new, but if publishers had their way as soon as the game was no longer being printed they would love to be able to push a button to destroy any copies left, which is why I don't like digital distribution that much and think physical media will always have a place, but that's another discussion.

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

LOL!!!

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

Astonishing?. Not one bit. Hypocritical?. Loads.

The MAFIAAs need to die.

Re: RIAA's Hand Gets Caught in the Torrent Cookie Jar

Wasn't it pretty obvious that this would be the case?

I bet if we knew the IPs of all of the Congress-critters, we'd find a couple of those that are 'nerds' on the list, as well.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Which is why the entire GG crowd looks like a giant bad egg07/31/2015 - 4:55pm
Craig R.Irony: the people who are feeling hostility toward their 'gamer' identity are often those who are most hostile to everybody else07/31/2015 - 4:55pm
Andrew EisenIt's not about gamers at all, it's discussing the harassment and abuse that Sarkeesian and Quinn had suffered. So yeah, not a great title but not an attack on gamers either.07/31/2015 - 4:48pm
Andrew EisenI agree than many of the titles are kinda bunk though. For example, Ars Technia's "The death of the 'gamers' and the women who 'killed' them" doesn't really work for the article.07/31/2015 - 4:47pm
Andrew EisenAnd I still don't see how articles like Polygon's "An awful week to care about video games" can be construed as an attack.07/31/2015 - 4:25pm
Andrew Eisen18 total? I've seen several lists and the total has never been above 14. The most popular collection seems to be 9 on Aug. 28 then three more on Aug. 29, Sep. 2 and Sep. 3.07/31/2015 - 4:24pm
Infophile@Goth_Skunk: Your distaste for TMS is noted and given exactly the respect it deserves. The fact that you don't like a site doesn't mean they can't be right. In the linked article, they are.07/31/2015 - 4:06pm
Goth_SkunkAnd the worst volleys are the ones being fired by the kind of people who should be standing up and saying 'Hey! This isn't cool! Stop that!'07/31/2015 - 4:05pm
Goth_SkunkNow let's come full circle: One such confrontationally titled article is easy to dismiss. Within a day, nine similarly titled articles are written. Within 4 more days, nine more articles are written. This can't be ignored. This is a blatant attack.07/31/2015 - 4:04pm
Andrew EisenAnd that's totally fine. I too often skip articles and videos based solely on an unappealing title.07/31/2015 - 3:56pm
Goth_SkunkPersonally, I would not waste time reading an article with such a blatantly confrontational title.07/31/2015 - 3:52pm
Andrew EisenGoth - Depends on how the article was written and what it actually said.07/31/2015 - 3:49pm
Goth_SkunkThis is like going fishing and castign a HUGE net that captures tuna, dolphins, sharks, cod, and salmon when all you really want to capture are clownfish.07/31/2015 - 3:48pm
Andrew EisenPerm - If the specific make and model are made clear, I have no problem with the article saving space by refering to them as "these cars" or whatever.07/31/2015 - 3:47pm
Goth_Skunk... Hasbro's widening horizons..." would it not make sense that some would object there is no distinction being made between a reactionary brony and a stable-minded brony?07/31/2015 - 3:47pm
Big PermCars are being recalled because they explode. Editors Note at the end: Not all cars, only this specific make and model07/31/2015 - 3:46pm
Andrew EisenI still feel it was clear that they were admonishing a particular and very specific type of gamer. It's why I had no problem with any of the articles (especially since about half of them weren't really about "gamers" anyway).07/31/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_Skunk@Andrew: If a columnist had written a "Bronies Are Dead" article, but in the article stated: "Note: I'm not talking about every guy who watches MLP or who self-identifies as a brony, just the type of reactionary holdouts that feel so threatened by..."07/31/2015 - 3:45pm
benohawkYou would if you didn't care.07/31/2015 - 3:43pm
Big PermIf you're referring to a certain subset of gamers, you wouldn't refer to that subset under the umbrella term of gamer. Or at least I wouldn't, because I think that's ridiculous.07/31/2015 - 3:42pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician