U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant Wasteful Spending

December 22, 2011 -

U.S. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) is taking a bit of heat this week for saying that a $113,277 grant given to Rochester's International Center for the History of Electronic Games (ICHEG) is wasteful spending. He named it as one of a hundred "unnecessary, duplicative and low-priority projects" that the federal government spent money on in 2011. He released his annual report on wasteful spending in this report. Wars were not included in his list of 100 or lawmakers bloated salaries and luxurious healthcare benefits. Coburn also failed to mention video-game related projects being designed for the CIA, training simulations that use game technology, etc. that carry price tags in the millions...

"Video games, robot dragons, Christmas trees, and magic museums. This is not a Christmas wish list, these are just some of the ways the federal government spent your tax dollars," Coburn wrote in a statement, referring readers to a report [PDF format] attempting to call out wasteful federal money spending.

International Center for the History of Electronic Games director Jon-Paul Dyson wrote a rather lengthy response on his blog (reprinted on Gamasutra) defending the grant and the idea of preserving art.

"Can we imagine how researchers in the 22nd century will view the earliest groundbreaking interactive video?," asked Dyson. "Without the work of institutions like The Strong’s International Center for the History of Electronic Games the vitality and imagination of early gaming would be lost to future generations.”

"We don’t think this should happen," he continued. "So despite this recent criticism, we pledge to continue, and even to increase, our preservation efforts in the future. Like great novels, movies, music, and paintings of the past, video games are too important to lose."

Critics argue that, despite the noble efforts, it should not be the government's (and by proxy, taxpayers') job to support or preserve the history of video games. They say that the industry should do more to support such efforts, and finding more ways of getting private funding would be the right avenue to take. But supporters point out that, in the grand scheme of things, $113,000 is a drop in the bucket compared to some of the dumb stuff our money is spent on. Both sides make valid points, but does this grant rise to the level of wasteful spending that the Senator thinks it does? No. A good example of wasteful spending is when taxpayers are paying lawmakers a salary - even when they are out raising money for re-election...

Source: Gamasutra


Comments

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

He's right. Every tax dollar the government spends is stolen from tax payers. People ignore that because they are so used to being robbed. If people would remember that then maybe people would remember that taxes should only be used for the most useful purposes and the rest given back to the people it was stolen from.

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

I think it is wasteful spending, when we have other problems right now.

 

Save this one for later, when the economy is back on track.

Yes, I am a liberal. I also believe in a strong military, less government, and the right to bear arms. 

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

I think video games yes need to be preserved for future generations to see the great advances we have had in such a short time but just dedicate an entire museum to video game at this time in our nations history would be wasteful since we have so much other issues to deal with.

I take my son the Museum of Science and Industry every year for the past two years and I noticed the grand majority of the museum is quite outdated from computer equipment and exhibits from 1991-93.

If you ever go to Chicago I recommend going the German U Boat is amazing and Old Town where a part of the museum has a literal 1910s type street with stores and even an old movie silent theater (With old fashion Ice Cream!) that’s the only outdated exhibit I expect to see.

Our current Museums need to be updated and to be honest they need to be held accountable. The African American Slavery museum is a big example where the guy opened took donations and tax money and items loaned and then filed for bankruptcy.

Even the Museum of Science and Industry they have a new exibit were it’s a literal Green house. Meaning a house that tries to be ‘green’ in every way. Not only is it promoting leftist propaganda for things no one can afford but it’s an exhibit no one will see because you have to pay a separate fee to see. And unless you’re a zealous leftist most people don’t shell out an extra 20-30 bucks to take a walk through of a literal house.

Also why not add in a video game exhibit to current museums? Museum of Science and Industry has one but just an arcade of free games of shity old racers.

I think gaming with its advancement in technology it will be inevitable until that technology makes it way into all museums.

 

Oh I love museums

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

Eh, sadly, in regards to preservation, some game publishers would be all too happy to see a classic game vanish forever in the name of forcing people to get the latest one.

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

Well if he wants to cut wasteful spending, there is a piece of potential legislation that feel pretty wasteful...

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

A Republican senator has no right to call this wasteful spending. The Iraq war was wasteful spending.

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

Actually, looking at his record, he apparently voted against the Iraq war spending... so when it comes to fiscial issues he puts his money where his mouth is.

He is, however, a bit of a monster.. including being in favor of the death penalty for abortion doctors (including rape cases) and was sued for involuntarily sterilizing a 20 year old... and of course works with The Family.. a rather corrupt organization that prostitutes young Christian girls..... so ethically he is pretty horrible.

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

So, what you're saying is that he's the closest thing to an honest politician we'll ever see?

Re: U.S. Senator Calls Video Game History Museum Grant ...

Not really.  He is honest where it suits him, and a hypocrite where that suits him instead.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Papa MidnightWii U Games finding Solidarity with PC Gamers :(08/19/2014 - 6:09pm
Zenbuy all of the bad DLC before they even showed the main content everyone was waiting for. I paid for it, I wanted it, and I got tossed aside.08/19/2014 - 4:10pm
ZenIanC: Yep, both Call of Duty games did the same thing holding back all DLC and then releasing the day one map 2 YEARS later out of the blue. Why play what they won't support. Warner Bros canceled their DLC after promising it because Wii U owners didn't08/19/2014 - 4:09pm
Andrew EisenShe's the developer of Depression Quest. It's an interesting game (although I wouldn't call it fun) and you can check it out for free at depressionquest.com.08/19/2014 - 2:48pm
Sleakerwhat's all this Zoe quinn stuff all over and should I even bother looking it up?08/19/2014 - 2:37pm
IanCExactly Zen. The third one had random delays to the DLC and they just came out seemingly at random with no warning, and the 4th they didn't even bother.08/19/2014 - 2:31pm
ZenI may have bought both AC games on Wii U, but WHY would anyone be expected to get the game when they came out MONTHS before release that they were skipping DLC and ignoring the game? They poisoned the market on themselves then blamed Nintendo players.08/19/2014 - 1:27pm
Papa MidnightIn review, that's fair, Andrew. I just tend to take Gawker articles with a lot of salt, and skepticism.08/19/2014 - 12:07pm
Matthew WilsonFor one has a English speaking support team for devs. Devs have said any questions they have, were translated in to Japanese. then back in to English. 08/19/2014 - 11:41am
Adam802they need to realize the "wii-fad" era is pretty much over and start rebooting some old great franchises like they are doing with star fox08/19/2014 - 11:39am
Adam802unfortunatly, this seems to represent 3rd party's position on the wiiU in general. Nintendo has always sucessfully relied on 1st party but now since 3rd parties and console "power" are so important this gen, they're in trouble.08/19/2014 - 11:38am
IanCOkay, so what can Nintendo do to these 3rd parties? Huh? If a company release games late with missing content then of course it won't sell. Seems simple to me.08/19/2014 - 11:25am
Andrew EisenSakurai and Co. REALLY need to go back in there and re-pose Samus. She is so incredibly broken.08/19/2014 - 11:06am
ZippyDSMleeUntill Nin starts paying out the azz or doing much much more to help 3rd party games development, the WIIU is dead in the water.....08/19/2014 - 11:03am
ZippyDSMleehttps://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=316135481893472&id=22417313775637408/19/2014 - 11:02am
ZippyDSMlee*gets out the popcorn* this will be fun08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenIt's not as simple as "Nintendo gamers don't buy AC games."08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenACIII was late, missing DLC (so was IV) and was on a brand new platform that had never had the series competing against two platforms that had an install base of 80 million a piece who had all the previous games.08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenI'd say TechDirt is being a bit unfair towards Kotaku's article to the point of slightly mischaracterizing it. It's not really bad but, while a little muddled, neither is the Kotaku article.08/19/2014 - 10:59am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician