Accounting Firm Says Viacom Owes Harmonix $383 Million

December 28, 2011 -

According to an accountant jointly appointed by both Viacom and former (major) shareholders of Harmonix, the former parent company of the Rock Band series makers owes in excess of $383 million. The details of the audit were revealed last week, according to this Gamasutra report.

On Tuesday, Viacom filed suit in a Delaware court asking that the accounting firm, BDO USA, "consider arguments and evidence that were improperly excluded" from its report, saying that its figures resulted from "manifest error." The legal battle is related to the 2006 deal that saw Viacom acquiring Boston-based Harmonix shortly after the success of its Guitar Hero games. Under the terms of the agreement, Viacom paid Harmonix's shareholders an initial sum of $175 million in September 2006, with the promise of bonus earn-outs dependent on the studio's performance in 2007 and 2008.

For 2007, Viacom was supposed to pay shareholders 3.5 times any gross profit made over $32 million during the year. For 2008, it was supposed to pay 3.5 times anything over $45 million. But the only earn-out money to come from Viacom was a $150 million payment in 2007 in anticipation of that year's profits. The company now claims that the sum was based on a "preliminary calculation." According to Viacom's lawsuit filed in September, the calculation was not accurate, and the amount owed for both 2007 and 2008 combined was a mere $18 million.

If BDO's figures are certified by the court, the total purchase price of Harmonix would come to right around $708 million, which includes the initial $175 million purchase price, a $150 million earn-out payment that was already received, and the additional $383 million that it allegedly owes.

Source: Gamasutra

Posted in

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@pm I doubt it. Google seems to be distancing themselves from G+07/25/2014 - 9:31pm
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician