Apple v. Motorola Judge Calls Patent Litigants 'Animals'

July 5, 2012 -

In an interview with Reuters, the US Court of Appeals (Chicago) judge who recently tossed the patent litigation case between Apple and Motorola described patent litigants as "animals" and said that many companies should not have patent protections. Judge Richard Posner, who usually serves on the Court of Appeals, said that he volunteered to oversee the Apple/Motorola case in the lower US District Court.

"It's a constant struggle for survival," Posner told Reuters in an interview. "As in any jungle, the animals will use all the means at their disposal, all their teeth and claws that are permitted by the ecosystem."

Posner also said that the pharmaceuticals industries have a better claim to intellectual property protection because of the enormous investment it takes to create a successful drug. He did not feel the same way about technology and software companies.

"It's not clear that we really need patents in most industries," he said. "You just have this proliferation of patents. It's a problem."

Posner also revealed that at the start of the Apple v. Motorola case, he told both parties that he was "really neutral" because he used a court-issued BlackBerry made by Research In Motion Ltd. He revealed that he now owns an iPhone, but only uses it to "check email and call his wife."

"I'm not actually that interested in becoming part of the smartphone generation," he said.

You can read the whole article on Reuters.

Source: Ars Technica

"Lion (panthera leo) and lioness fighting as part of mating ritual in bushveld, South Africa" © 2012 Hedrus / Shutterstock.com. All rights reserved.

 


Comments

Re: Apple v. Motorola Judge Calls Patent Litigants 'Animals'

I wonder if this will set some kind of precedent.

 

Also...

 

"He revealed that he now owns an iPhone, but only uses it to "check email and call his wife.""

 

Major burn. Willing to bet that bruised a few egos.

Re: Apple v. Motorola Judge Calls Patent Litigants 'Animals'

Of course, because there's no enormous investment involved in new technologies.  Instead, we need to protect the patents that force people to pay thousands of dollars a month to not die.

Re: Apple v. Motorola Judge Calls Patent Litigants 'Animals'

The patents aren't what causes that. True it doesn't help but if the pharmaceutical companies didn't have so much influence something could be done about them.

Re: Apple v. Motorola Judge Calls Patent Litigants 'Animals'

welcome to the jungle...

Re: Apple v. Motorola Judge Calls Patent Litigants 'Animals'

*Gets a gun and goes a hunting*


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician