I’m going to keep this brief because I have very strong opinions on this one and it’s difficult not to fill this post with arguments supporting my position on the subject. (In fact, I just deleted three paragraphs worth.)
So, the Adults Only rating. Do you think the ESRB should keep it? Currently, it prevents games with explicit sexual content and extremely graphic violence from making it out onto the market. Is that the way it should be?
Or should the ESRB instead retire the rating and allow M (17+) to handle even the highest levels of sex and violence?
Perhaps you think the AO rating should be reserved solely for pornography or maybe you have an even better idea that you’d like to discuss in the comments or email to SuperPACPodcast@gmail.com. I can’t wait to read your takes on this one and discuss the whole shebang on next week’s Super Podcast Action Committee.
-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Contributing Editor Andrew Eisen