Conn. Senator Chris Murphy Thinks Video Games Have a Role in Mass Shootings Like Sandy Hook

Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) says that exposure to violent media such as video games can put those with mental illnesses "over the edge" and that he supports President Obama's plan for more research into violent games. The research – which includes (for the first time) the study of the (possible) connection between guns and mass shootings – was recommended by the Administration in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings in Newtown Conn. in December of last year which resulted in the deaths of 20 children and six adults. In January of this year the President proposed spending $10 million in research to be conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health.

Senator Murphy's comments came out of a recent Google Hangout in response to a question posed by GameSpot who asked "why he chose to single out video games during a speech in January and what message he has for the video game industry at large."

"Obviously, this is a very sensitive issue in Connecticut. Newtown is still in crisis," Murphy said in response. "Not enough healing going on there in the wake of the murder of 26 children and educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School. And you know, what we know are the facts about that crime. What we know is that this young man, deeply mentally ill walking the school with an assault weapon armed with 30-round magazines. What we know is that he was very, very severely mentally ill; that his mother had been trying to get him help for years. And what we also know, is that he spent a lot of time playing violent video games."

Murphy went on to say that the Sandy Hook shooter's violent outburst cannot be pinned on any one element, but claimed that a trend does exist that shows past mass shooters had "exposure to these video games."

"Now, nobody can sit here for certain and say that without any one of those things, without the powerful weapons, without the mental illness, without the exposure to video games, this wouldn't have happened. We can't put ourselves in his mind," Murphy said. "But we do see a trend where some of these shooters do have exposure to these video games."

Murphy also acknowledged that there is no scientific data to back up much of what he and others have put forward on the connection between playing violent video games and violent mass shootings.

"What we admittedly don't have…is any peer-reviewed studies or research that tell us that there is a definitive link between exposure to violent video games and violence," Murphy said. "What researchers will tell you, is that if you already have a severe mental illness, and a predilection to violence, perhaps the video game exposure can put you over the edge. But in and of itself, there is no research showing that there's a link."

"It's one of the reasons why I've supported president Obama and vice president Biden in their efforts to have the CDC and the NIH do more research on the root causes of gun violence; one of the things they are going to do research on now is that link between exposure to violent video games and to violent episodes because I admit that we don't have the research there to back up what we see anecdotally in the case of Adam Lanza, for instance," he added.

Finally Murphy said that no legislation would be passed before having some valid research on the subject.

Source: GameSpot


Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on RedditEmail this to someone


  1. 0
    ecco6t9 says:

    When someone like this blames Hollywood,Video Games,Books or the 2nd amendment for a tragedy it makes myself care less about the "tragedy".

  2. 0
    Mr. Blond says:

    Remember, this is the guy we chose over Linda McMahon.

    Someone should remind him that tomorrow is the 2-year anniversary of the decision in Brown v. EMA.

  3. 0
    NyuRena says:

    I'm sure there is a "trend" in teens and young adults playing video games. We should also look into the trend of "duck-lips" posted on Facebook while we are at it. Maybe there is something there as well?

    (Why is MENTAL ILLNESS not the prime focus in all of this drivel?! It's the only thing that sets any of the shooters apart from NORMAL video game playing, instagram/twitter spamming, youths!)


  4. 0
    Zen says:

    Well of course they know for sure…they had the NSA on him as a dangerous videogame player…or an American citizen in general. They just didn't feel like telling anyone because it was "classified".

    Freaking idiot. (politician…not Andrew lol)

  5. 0
    Andrew Eisen says:

    "And what we also know, is that he spent a lot of time playing violent video games."

    We do?  How do we know that?  I've seen absolutely no evidence of such.  Why don't you share with the rest of the class?


    Andrew Eisen

  6. 0
    GrimCW says:

    I can prove they all watched TV, watched at least one similar movie, used phones, and had exposure to the bible in one form or another too, oh, and they breathed air  and ate some sort of junk food at one time or another.

    does that mean all of these MUST be investigated too? His line of reasoning is piss poor at best…

    moving along, not sure how the look of the firearm he had, had anything to do with it, it was still semi auto, and it was said he reloaded way to often (now THAT i could see being linked to things like CoD playing) but looks do not make it more dangerous. and it shows bad control and state of mind (given he did have some experience with the rifle) if he only took down 26 people.

    I do enjoy how politicians still enjoy using buzz words and labels to make things sound more dangerous or threatening in general.

    The term "terrorist" has been so over abused its lost all meaning and is now practically applied to any criminal, and "assault" whatever is now applied to anything that LOOKS similar to military grade weaponry.

Leave a Reply