House Intelligence Chairman Laments CISPA Stall

House Intelligence chairman Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) reiterated this week that he is frustrated with how the Edward Snowden leaks about the NSA's domestic spying programs on U.S. citizens has stalled the progress of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act in the Senate. Rogers spoke at a panel discussion hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. yesterday.

CISPA passed the House in April but has not received a vote in the Senate yet. While Rogers blames some of this on Snowden's leaks, the Senate has held off on offering any kind of counterpart legislation to CISPA until recently. Rogers says that Snowden's leaks to the media damaged perceptions of the bill and raised "underserved" concerns that it would allow more government access to personal information.

"The biggest problem we had was not the technical aspects of it. It was the perception," he said. "When you think of this threat–that we're going to allow our private sector, the next generation of innovation…to fly out the back door because we have a misperception about what we're trying to do in defense–shame on us," he said.

James Andrew Lewis, director of the Technology and Public Policy Program at CSIS, also spoke at the panel. He also complained about the lack of urgency on the part of lawmakers in the Senate to strengthen cybersecurity.

"It won't be another 9/11. I hate 'cyber 9/11.' I hate 'cyber Pearl Harbor'…I hate all those things. They're exaggerations. But we're in the same pattern. We can see the iceberg coming towards the ship, and we're saying, 'Ah, that's really interesting. Look at that big white thing,'" he said.

More remarks from the panel can be found here, but the gist of Rogers' comments is that a delay puts the country at risk. Rights groups want certain provisions stripped from the bill (like blanket immunity from court action for corporations) and for more oversight from an independent body when it comes to collecting and sharing personal data.

Source: FierceGovernmentIT

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on RedditEmail this to someone


  1. 0
    Sleaker says:

    And we all know it's the governments job to prevent incorrect access to private company databases that shouldn't be online accessible in the first place.

  2. 0
    GrimCW says:

    "puts the country at risk"

    And of course, as always, the only way to prevent that teeny tiny risk, is to allow the government greater access to anything and everything the private citizen (the non-terrorist) has to offer. 

    Meanwhile the ones actually more likely to be a risk, are left out of the system and ignored entirely. I mean, if they actually monitored the risk factors, then they wouldn't have reason to tighten the grip on the non-risk ones. So why in the world would we ever want to do that!

Leave a Reply