Submitted by Archgabe - August 13, 2007 at 10:51 am -050068.198.237.63
I almost thought this was a joke... But they aparently are serious and some good points are made.
-Due Process & Habeas Corpus (instead of the usual ban hammer, a player tribunal, perhaps?)
(Good idea expet for one problem... Greifers are the equiveleant of online terrorists and should be dealt with no mercy. With most MMOs there is an appeals process or you can just make a new account. Getting banned is not an end all be all punishment. You just have to work hard to get back in. And with most MMOs, a ban is the last step after you ignored the warnings.)
-Right to free avatar expression and assembly
(Good... Umm, can't we do that anyway as long as it does not violate the ToS?)
-Non discrimination
(I need explenation on this one. Anyone can make an avatar and go into an online world. And no company can deny you the ability to play the game for real life reasons like race or religion because there are laws already in place that makes that illegal. And if you are getting bashed for being a short stubby gnome kiddie? Well, you made the choice to be a gnome. You have extra MP and more powerful spells. Defend yourself you stumpy football!)
-Right to transfer your whole account to another individual (you listening, Blizzard?)
(Seconded)
-Compensating users for service outages
(Hell yeah! Like hell I am going to pay for a month of service when the server was down for 27 days! Anyone remember thoes days in WoW?)
-Permitting mashups and fan art
(It is called free advertising. It worked for blizzard and now they have a strong fanbase. THis is a no brainer.)
-Welcoming user-created content
(As long as it does not violate the ToS or gives unfair advantage to a player.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:22pm PHOENIXZERO: Ugh, that CNBC program "Play to Win" is it? Is on again...
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:34pm ZippyDSM: todayin zippy land:after spending 8 hours working on my AC unit yesterday it finally died today. theres go 300$ I don't have...tin trailers are ovens in the summer >>
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:17pm Cheater87: http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/news/132121.20080723.Saints-Row-2-uncensored-in-Australia/
-Due Process & Habeas Corpus (instead of the usual ban hammer, a player tribunal, perhaps?)
(Good idea expet for one problem... Greifers are the equiveleant of online terrorists and should be dealt with no mercy. With most MMOs there is an appeals process or you can just make a new account. Getting banned is not an end all be all punishment. You just have to work hard to get back in. And with most MMOs, a ban is the last step after you ignored the warnings.)
-Right to free avatar expression and assembly
(Good... Umm, can't we do that anyway as long as it does not violate the ToS?)
-Non discrimination
(I need explenation on this one. Anyone can make an avatar and go into an online world. And no company can deny you the ability to play the game for real life reasons like race or religion because there are laws already in place that makes that illegal. And if you are getting bashed for being a short stubby gnome kiddie? Well, you made the choice to be a gnome. You have extra MP and more powerful spells. Defend yourself you stumpy football!)
-Right to transfer your whole account to another individual (you listening, Blizzard?)
(Seconded)
-Compensating users for service outages
(Hell yeah! Like hell I am going to pay for a month of service when the server was down for 27 days! Anyone remember thoes days in WoW?)
-Permitting mashups and fan art
(It is called free advertising. It worked for blizzard and now they have a strong fanbase. THis is a no brainer.)
-Welcoming user-created content
(As long as it does not violate the ToS or gives unfair advantage to a player.)