Submitted by Monkey - October 8, 2007 at 4:39 am -0500134.83.1.233
Oh I totally agree. Its pointless if parents keep buying them for their kids. To be honest thats just to protect the developers and the industry, with sections of society hell bent on blaming games for wider social issues such a move would end much of the bizarre finger pointing and hysterical wails of "wont someone think of the children!". It would mean the spurious law suits against developers would have even less legs to stand on. (probably a number like -5)
But I suppose that some sections would claim its an admission of guilt, which would be very twisted logic but not all that out of character. Given the American media's questionable reporting, I could well imagine someone jumping on the idea of banning games entirely the next time a teenager cracks under the pressure of their society. I still think that in reality these claims would have even less impact on the mainstream if such a move was adopted.
Lets face we are the mainstream now. It could also be argued that the fact that parents continue to buy mature rated games for their children is because they don't view them as a threat to their safety. Perhaps there isn't great public outcry about games but rather a great lack of public interest in a farcical argument?
Posted 07/06/08 at 06:57pm Silencets: I bet the Floida Supreme Court is just shaking in fear of JT
Posted 07/06/08 at 06:55pm Silencets: JT is always on the right track. Look how many cases he's won!
Posted 07/06/08 at 01:57pm BlackIce: It might be just a bit too late now.
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:07pm Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Jack, Jack, Jack... When will you learn?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:38am tallimar: hmm... youre right, im not getting the right mind frame... "YOU WILL LIKE FRIES WITH THAT!" how's that?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:36am gameman9: Nah, he will just scare the customers.
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:35am tallimar: i think jack's new line may end up being "would you like fries with that?"
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
But I suppose that some sections would claim its an admission of guilt, which would be very twisted logic but not all that out of character. Given the American media's questionable reporting, I could well imagine someone jumping on the idea of banning games entirely the next time a teenager cracks under the pressure of their society. I still think that in reality these claims would have even less impact on the mainstream if such a move was adopted.
Lets face we are the mainstream now. It could also be argued that the fact that parents continue to buy mature rated games for their children is because they don't view them as a threat to their safety. Perhaps there isn't great public outcry about games but rather a great lack of public interest in a farcical argument?