Making videogames illegal doesn't help at all. Honestly, if age-inappropriate movies and music and books and other forms of art could not legally be sold to minors (they all can), there would be no problem with adding videogames to the list.

The problem is that individually targeting videogames to not be sold to children is just as illegal as targeting any of those other media forms, and contrary to this man's completely out-of-the-blue contention, there is considerably less data connecting video games to violence than there is connecting any one of those other forms of media to violence--and that despite all the recent efforts to demonize games.

Ok, scratch that, the real problem is idiots in positions of authority jumping on video games as the cause to crimes because they don't realize that a ridiculously small percentage of all gamers commit these sort of severe crimes--and don't quote me, but I'm pretty sure there was a study comparing the percentages of non-gamers who commit crimes compared to the percentage of gamers, and there was a statistically significant difference: the non-gamers are much more likely to commit crimes. Do I know this? No, I think I read it in an official government webpage, so I SAY that this is only what I THINK instead of coming across as stating fact.

Do we go around pointing to this type of data as evidence to criminalize NOT gaming? More importantly, do we use our professional positions as platforms through which to make unfounded claims which have no basis in reality or for which we have no conclusive studies? No, because it's downright immoral, and incredibly unprofessional (and, for a cop, a betrayal to those who trust you to be honest and informed about your subjects) to so wrongfully let people THINK that you know what you're talking about.

When a cop or a politician in particular says something like this, the people listening tend to assume they are saying something with the force of law behind it, something which has been conclusively demonstrated to be true, and something that they know a considerable amount about. This man, by making such a claim in the absence of actual evidence or studies, has just done an incredible disservice to the people he was speaking to, and all who will read that quote.

Thank you, Chief Jordan, for misinforming the people who trust you and furthering yet another bias so that even more people come to believe that video games are rare and inexplicable and that anyone who plays them is only a ticking time bomb and the most likely suspect in any crime. Jerk.

Reply

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/25/08 at 12:57am
Artifex: http://videogames.yahoo.com/feature/playstation-2-component-incites-african-war/1231745
Posted 07/25/08 at 12:57am
Artifex: Yahoo has picked up the "Playstation War" story.
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:57pm
gamepolitics: that whole running-for-bar-president was just another attention grab
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:26pm
Silencets: Can a disbarred member become President? By the time of the election ol Jacko won't be a lawyo
Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm
Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am
lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am
SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am
M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am
Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am
M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am
E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am
sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am
sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm
LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm
gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm
GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Login or register to post shouts