Submitted by nightwng2000 - November 4, 2007 at 8:16 am -0500
If true, it would be a sign that certain retailers give in easily to fear mongering, fraud, lies, deceit, and corruption of various individuals and and so-called "morally superior" organizations.

One could easily use similar inflammatory statements as the "morally superior" individuals and organizations and state that such retailers are clearly against Freedom of Speech, against the US Constitution, against the First Amendment, against everything that the US Constitution stands for, and in favor of an Anti-American dictatorship, just like those individuals and organizations who falsely and fraudulently claim to be aginst censorship and "only protecting children" when, in fact, their pressure to violate the Rights of citizens of the US is clearly acts of Anti-American forces within the US.

Hey, if they can make all sorts of false inflammatory statements against those who SUPPORT the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech, it only seems fair to make TRUE inflammatory statements against those who are openly AGAINST Freed of Speech, AGAINST the US Constinution, and even AGAINST Parent's Rights to make their OWN decisions regarding their OWN children. They can lie and deceive people all they want, claiming that they offered less severe actions, but their OWN actions PROVE otherwise.

Do retailers have the Right to carry or not carry a product? Of course they do. HOWEVER, when the claimed justification is inconsistant with the carrying of other similar products, one has to wonder what the TRUTH is. Let them make up whatever justification they want. To date, the only TRUE excuse is bowing to Anti-US-Constitution forces attempting to create and Anti-American dictatorship. Let those who are in favor of a dictatorship come to Target's defense all they want. They just show their TRUE stances by lying and deceiving the general public with all sorts of false claims.

As I said, if Target were consistant in its actions, that would be one thing. Not to mention that facts about the content of Manhunt 2 were known months ago, before they started ordering. So, let them cover up with whatever false excuses they can. The Truth, The WHOLE Truth, and Nothing But The Truth will always win out.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software

Reply

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 08/21/08 at 04:15pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Hot damn, the Trolls must've taken some troll steroids...they are all over today.
Posted 08/21/08 at 03:03pm
Talouin: @ZippyDSMlee: Yea, that game has a really high learning curve fun when you got the hang of it but the SE developers need a kick
Posted 08/21/08 at 02:45pm
ZippyDSMlee: Talouin:I quit FF11 3 months after I started, is a horrible game from top to bottom.
Posted 08/21/08 at 02:28pm
Talouin: @SimonBob: I have never been happier I quit FFXI last month until now.
Posted 08/21/08 at 01:59pm
ZippyDSMlee: Boyycotting only works when sheeple care, the masses have to want to care about subtleties, in general they do not thus why corporate gets as far as it does. However boycotting can raise a fuss and the bad PR might make them take note.
Posted 08/21/08 at 01:20pm
SimonBob: There's a full explanation of the FFXI PW fight up: http://rukenshin.livejournal.com/17133.html
Posted 08/21/08 at 01:16pm
Talouin: @Quander, That fight is brand spanking new. People just don't know how to do it yet.
Posted 08/21/08 at 01:06pm
AM: @GP: Boycott is unlikely to be effective due to how few people would be aware/participate. That said, I boycott EA over their "3 installs then buy another copy" copy protection, so I can't say it's NOT a good idea.
Posted 08/21/08 at 01:06pm
GryphonOsiris: @Scribe, just read that. The reports are saying that is was a targeted killing. Odds are a bully, gang related or something.
Posted 08/21/08 at 01:03pm
SimonBob: I just glanced over some of the companies' game lists; turns out I was already boycotting three of them anyway.
Posted 08/21/08 at 12:53pm
DarkTetsuya: @scribe999 yeah I heard about that, and I *thought* I saw a vulture circling the area...
Posted 08/21/08 at 12:53pm
DarkTetsuya: @scribe999 yeah I heard about that, and I *thought* I saw a vulture circling the area...
Posted 08/21/08 at 12:36pm
gamepolitics: is a gamer boycott of atari, codemasters, topware and the other 2 UK firms who are extorting file-sharers a good idea?
Posted 08/21/08 at 12:19pm
scribe999: Another school shooting...this time in Tennessee. Terrible news. And I'm sure there's much hyperbole to follow.
Posted 08/21/08 at 12:10pm
sortableturnip: hehehe ;)
Posted 08/21/08 at 12:09pm
DarkTetsuya: @sortableturnip I'm totally putting what you said as my sig :P thanks!
Posted 08/21/08 at 12:02pm
sortableturnip: OMG JT speaking in front of another BS group: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2007/09/04/ pardon-our-appearance.aspx?pg=2 &view=threaded
Posted 08/21/08 at 11:50am
Neeneko: @Quander - I"m not all that familiar with FFXI, but maybe this mob just requires more gank? or there is a trick? larger group?
Posted 08/21/08 at 07:54am
sortableturnip: The "smoking gun" is the Florida Bar dropping its insurance coverage from Nationwide
Posted 08/20/08 at 05:19pm
jccalhoun: it would be interesting to hire a detective to investigae Jacko and find out his "smoking gun"
Login or register to post shouts