I don't understand why it is a bad thing for the military to recruit people? We live in a country of voluntary enlistment. Voluntary enlistment.The military personnel we have currently chose to be there. They can also make the choice to reenlist or not (my brother, for instance, chose not to reenlist in the Air Force and is a civilian once again). There are countries in this world where military service is not voluntary. Heck, it wasn't too long ago that there was a mandatory draft in the US itself!

Look, to protect our freedoms and land, we need X number of troops, plain and simple. X being a number that can shift depending on the amount of threats there are to the US at the time, as well as any other circumstances. The recruiters aren't the ones deciding where the troops go fight. Heck, the President doesn't even make that decision -- the Congress decides if and where the US forces fight. Sure, the President has limited power over where the National Guard goes -- probably more than he should, but it still is somewhat limited. And, the President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. But the President needs the approval of Congress to commit those forces anywhere.

Anyway, as I said, there is a need for X number of troops. The military has recruiters to help attain that number. The recruiters, like any and all salespeople, will say whatever they can to fill their quota. Not necessarily boldface lie (some do), but at least not exactly tell everything about it either. Don't want to scare away the "customer" and all that. So what if the military is using a video game or two, or three, or whatever to recruit. They've used comics, TV, radio, magazine, and newspaper ads to do that for a lot longer. The recruiters are doing nothing wrong trying to get more people in the service. Don't lash out at them for whatever reason (like, for instance, disliking the current War). Take it to the people who have real power and responsibility for it -- the Congress. Write your Senator, your Representative, etc. Flood them with letters and anything else you can protesting the War. Get them to order a withdrawl of the troops, and even G.W. Bush can't override it.

If the recruiters played up the horrors and reality of war, they'd get probably no recruits. It would be counterproductive. There are military personnel leaving the service every day, there always has been -- either through death, injury, or their enlistment contract is up and they don't reenlist. These numbers have to be replaced. The recruiters have the impossible job of trying to replace those numbers. If the numbers are not replaced, then the military starts significantly dropping in size, and the US becomes a HUGE, tantalizing target for many nations or groups. The military is like a sieve, constantly reducing in size, and with the recruiters' job, it is restocking its numbers. Don't get upset at them for doing their job. Or would you rather think it better if the draft was reinstated?

Reply

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am
sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am
sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm
LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm
gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm
GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm
Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm
Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm
Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm
gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm
Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm
Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am
Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am
Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am
Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am
sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:22pm
PHOENIXZERO: Ugh, that CNBC program "Play to Win" is it? Is on again...
Login or register to post shouts